You might do well to learn physics and stay away from the magical interpretations. It's not "skewed." We can build an amazing array of technology from it. The proof of the pudding is in the eating.
Current limits of physics is restricted by the assumptions it is based upon. Yes, our limited understanding has produced some great stuff. Yet, it can never achieve the discoveries it will make once these assumptions are changed.
Where's the hard work? I read the journal "Galilean Electrodynamics" to keep abreast of the leading-edge thinking, but so far it is only speculation. Frederick Kantor made some great strides in his "Information Mechanics" (now a rare book) but we have no technology from it. I understand there is a lot of vague hope out there, but no one is writing a new "Principia" to show the path. We have a perfectly correct understanding of nuclear fusion, but the search for a practical power source has been going on for essentially my whole lifetime, with paltry results and a continually receding payoff date. You can hope for flying carpets, but for now we can only walk on them.
Check out Hassim Harimein's work, or "The Field" by Lynn McTaggart, Also there is a ton of research in DNA, heart energy and the field by "The HeartMath Institute."
Currently I am trying to digest new revelations from Terrence Howard (yes the actor). I think he might be onto something here and it turns current physics in it's head. Crazy? Maybe. But I am not so sure he isn't correct.
I've had some contact with this subject. The Casimir Force is perfectly explained by quantum physics, but the quantum vacuum does not seem to be treatable as an energy source from the standpoint of thermodynamics. I've read some by Rupert Sheldrake. Kirilian photography is a fascinating physical phenomenon. Unfortunately, my reading list now exceeds my ability to get through it.
So far, I can't see that you have done anything to improve your understanding of physics, except read enthusiast literature. You are just on a soapbox, upbraiding those of us who have worked with applied physics possibly longer than you have been alive. I may even have read about Tesla before you were born. If you can "think" in terms of 5 dimensions, write a book to explain how that thinking works. Do something we can look up to. Don't spend your time looking down on those that do something.
Wrong. I've learned physics, you haven't learned about they've been hiding from us. I've studied Tesla's writings, I've read his patents, we've been sold a big bag of lies about Energy, and Electricity.
Indeed. Tesla's ideas were shot down and cast aside because the bankers funding his research found no way to "Bill" for the energy since it was ubiquitous and free. So they cut his funding off and went with Edison.
So, all the people who have studied Tesla's writings and patents---where are all the devices that can be made from them? The proof of the pudding is in the eating, and there is no harvest. If you use known physics to design things, they work. Maybe there is more to learn (e.g., cold fusion), but what we know is not a lie.
People who study Tesla's patents, and writings under the scope of standard understanding of electrodynamics will get NOWHERE. If you apply what you learned college physics to Tesla's discoveries, you will only build his coils wrong, and end up just shooting purple sparks around that do nothing.
Tesla discovered a different form of electricity. Electricity WITHOUT magnetism, and here it is right here.
Tell me why, we are not taught that you can make circuits like this with cold electricity that can be put in water, and do NOT electrocute you when touched. Why aren't we taught of this form electricity?
Let me assure you I don't have all the answers... only a most inquisitive mind. But in general, many dormant patents and hundreds of scientific breakthroughs are hidden and stopped because of money. For example. Free universal energy would displace 100s of trillions of annual market dollars that are in our current system. Yes, 100 trillion would do a lot to solve other problems humans have... but humans are not the goal (presently)... money is.
According to you, who is going to teach it? Tesla? I think he falls in the emeritus category. You basically admit that studying Tesla's patents and writings is a worthless enterprise, because there is nothing there that allows you to replicate his technology.
And "nowhere" includes all the technology based on quantum physics (lasers, semiconductor circuits), which Tesla disdained. Even as we speak...(says the gentleman, typing on a laptop computer, communicating over optical fibers, to massive switching hubs).
You aren't making anything, so you are in no position to boast about Tesla who proved his worth by making technology that can be understood by today's physics and is still useful. If you want to start by explaining the effects in the video, that would be helpful. My own guess is that the configurations exploit high voltage to reduce the current (which is the real killer), and the high frequency to drive the free end of a circuit like a capacitor.
You might do well to learn physics and stay away from the magical interpretations. It's not "skewed." We can build an amazing array of technology from it. The proof of the pudding is in the eating.
Current limits of physics is restricted by the assumptions it is based upon. Yes, our limited understanding has produced some great stuff. Yet, it can never achieve the discoveries it will make once these assumptions are changed.
Where's the hard work? I read the journal "Galilean Electrodynamics" to keep abreast of the leading-edge thinking, but so far it is only speculation. Frederick Kantor made some great strides in his "Information Mechanics" (now a rare book) but we have no technology from it. I understand there is a lot of vague hope out there, but no one is writing a new "Principia" to show the path. We have a perfectly correct understanding of nuclear fusion, but the search for a practical power source has been going on for essentially my whole lifetime, with paltry results and a continually receding payoff date. You can hope for flying carpets, but for now we can only walk on them.
Check out Hassim Harimein's work, or "The Field" by Lynn McTaggart, Also there is a ton of research in DNA, heart energy and the field by "The HeartMath Institute."
Currently I am trying to digest new revelations from Terrence Howard (yes the actor). I think he might be onto something here and it turns current physics in it's head. Crazy? Maybe. But I am not so sure he isn't correct.
I've had some contact with this subject. The Casimir Force is perfectly explained by quantum physics, but the quantum vacuum does not seem to be treatable as an energy source from the standpoint of thermodynamics. I've read some by Rupert Sheldrake. Kirilian photography is a fascinating physical phenomenon. Unfortunately, my reading list now exceeds my ability to get through it.
Expand your thinking. Get out of the 3D contruct and think in terms of 5D. Ever read "Flatland?"
So far, I can't see that you have done anything to improve your understanding of physics, except read enthusiast literature. You are just on a soapbox, upbraiding those of us who have worked with applied physics possibly longer than you have been alive. I may even have read about Tesla before you were born. If you can "think" in terms of 5 dimensions, write a book to explain how that thinking works. Do something we can look up to. Don't spend your time looking down on those that do something.
Flatland is 2D, so what is your point?
Wrong. I've learned physics, you haven't learned about they've been hiding from us. I've studied Tesla's writings, I've read his patents, we've been sold a big bag of lies about Energy, and Electricity.
Indeed. Tesla's ideas were shot down and cast aside because the bankers funding his research found no way to "Bill" for the energy since it was ubiquitous and free. So they cut his funding off and went with Edison.
So, all the people who have studied Tesla's writings and patents---where are all the devices that can be made from them? The proof of the pudding is in the eating, and there is no harvest. If you use known physics to design things, they work. Maybe there is more to learn (e.g., cold fusion), but what we know is not a lie.
People who study Tesla's patents, and writings under the scope of standard understanding of electrodynamics will get NOWHERE. If you apply what you learned college physics to Tesla's discoveries, you will only build his coils wrong, and end up just shooting purple sparks around that do nothing.
Tesla discovered a different form of electricity. Electricity WITHOUT magnetism, and here it is right here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlx7tDNXYR8
Tell me why, we are not taught that you can make circuits like this with cold electricity that can be put in water, and do NOT electrocute you when touched. Why aren't we taught of this form electricity?
Let me assure you I don't have all the answers... only a most inquisitive mind. But in general, many dormant patents and hundreds of scientific breakthroughs are hidden and stopped because of money. For example. Free universal energy would displace 100s of trillions of annual market dollars that are in our current system. Yes, 100 trillion would do a lot to solve other problems humans have... but humans are not the goal (presently)... money is.
According to you, who is going to teach it? Tesla? I think he falls in the emeritus category. You basically admit that studying Tesla's patents and writings is a worthless enterprise, because there is nothing there that allows you to replicate his technology.
And "nowhere" includes all the technology based on quantum physics (lasers, semiconductor circuits), which Tesla disdained. Even as we speak...(says the gentleman, typing on a laptop computer, communicating over optical fibers, to massive switching hubs).
You aren't making anything, so you are in no position to boast about Tesla who proved his worth by making technology that can be understood by today's physics and is still useful. If you want to start by explaining the effects in the video, that would be helpful. My own guess is that the configurations exploit high voltage to reduce the current (which is the real killer), and the high frequency to drive the free end of a circuit like a capacitor.