And then they came for me……..these arrogant people think they can cause harm to this woman for speaking her opinion? Did they take the oath? Do the uphold the constitution? Do they have bonds?
42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights < Anyone that gets into a situation needs to file suits under this law. Even if they beat the rap, they won't beat the ride.
In the 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the newspaper and established that the First Amendment protects freedom of speech and the press, including libelous statements about public officials. The decision established that public officials must prove that a defamatory statement was made with "actual malice" or "reckless disregard" of the truth in order to win a libel suit. "Actual malice" means the speaker knew the statement was false, or disregarded the truth. The ruling also established that the statement must be about the official individually, not about government policy in general. The New York Times v. Sullivan decision is considered a landmark case that has protected the press and others who speak on public affairs, and arguably helped the civil rights movement. It has also been said to give people a chance to fight against those with more power.
Every officer who unlawfully arrests over this shit must suffer earthly and then eternal judgement. Same goes for that shithead mayor. If they do not serve us, they have no right to be in charge of anything.
DETAINED UNDER SUSPICION OF COMMITTING _______ ????? WHAT CRIME OFFICER? NAME IT
OH THAT'S RIGHT YOU CANNOT BECAUSE YOU ARE ENFORCING A "POLICY" AND NOT A LAW
And then they came for me……..these arrogant people think they can cause harm to this woman for speaking her opinion? Did they take the oath? Do the uphold the constitution? Do they have bonds?
Sue them. Lawsuits are very effective against dumb asses who don't think things through.
A hanging tends to work better.
Yes, that would get their attention immediately
I wonder what crime they will charge her with. That "agreement" is not law.
exactly!! The cops aren't "Policy Enforcement" they are Law Enforcement!
Can't have a 1st amendment without the 2nd. Proof right here.
42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights < Anyone that gets into a situation needs to file suits under this law. Even if they beat the rap, they won't beat the ride.
Sue but we are almost to the point where we need to remove these tyrants. They are going to regret this shit real soon
Almost was back in 2016 my fren.
In the 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the newspaper and established that the First Amendment protects freedom of speech and the press, including libelous statements about public officials. The decision established that public officials must prove that a defamatory statement was made with "actual malice" or "reckless disregard" of the truth in order to win a libel suit. "Actual malice" means the speaker knew the statement was false, or disregarded the truth. The ruling also established that the statement must be about the official individually, not about government policy in general. The New York Times v. Sullivan decision is considered a landmark case that has protected the press and others who speak on public affairs, and arguably helped the civil rights movement. It has also been said to give people a chance to fight against those with more power.
https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/new-york-times-co-v-sullivan/#:~:text=&text=In%20New%20York%20Times%20Co,saved%20the%20civil%20rights%20movement
Every officer who unlawfully arrests over this shit must suffer earthly and then eternal judgement. Same goes for that shithead mayor. If they do not serve us, they have no right to be in charge of anything.