Its so bloody obvious what they are trying to do. The link I provided is just one and its hilarious. Seems the sisterhood is upset because women do not get the credit they deserve for helping Hitler to rise to power. We get a bunch of far left, angry women carrying with a bit of support from some soy boys.
I lasted 15 minutes it was torture but there are a number of documentaries released on Hitler lately and all use the 'make Germany great again' tag constantly along with other attempts to portray MAGA as NAZI.
Not to draw too fine a point on what you said, but national socialism is different from marxist socialism. Hitler went to great length to describe the differences, among them, Germans owned private property.
It's often not accurate to try to compare the NSDAP to socialistic practices of today. It was a different time then, and the world was just beginning to explore types of progressive government differing from monarchies and autocracies. What worked then wouldn't work today, but that period of Germany worked so well they became a successful nation following the Weimar Republic...while the rest of the developed world struggled in the aftermath of the Great Depression.
I think your implication is that government working in concert with large corporations is similar to what is happening today...with tech companies doing the government's bidding to silence unwanted speech. Nothing like that happened in Germany during that time (of course there weren't high-tech firms or the internet like today). Such an action would be unquestionably a negative partnership to harm citizens and gain control of the populace...and, yes, I understand the point you're trying to make.
Germany did its best to silence the propaganda coming from the jewish-owned press, because it was intentionally devised to demoralize the German people and create a negative perception of Germany and Hitler to sway public opinion in the world. But the best Germany could do was counter with positive messaging to encourage the German people and build pride and patriotism.
Since the mark had become worthless because of policies from the Treaty of Versailles and manipulation during the Weimar Republic, Hitler had to find a new basis for Germany's currency. He settled on labor. This is why the German government worked with companies, to build on that system of labor to stabilize and grow the economy. The results were nothing short of staggering, and it was a positive partnership to rebuild the nation from the ashes.
Again, would something like this work today? No, but it was the right decision for the time given the circumstances.
I didn't mean to sidetrack your thread. I just wanted to point out the differences in types of socialism. I haven't watched any of the shows you linked to, but I can imagine that they are disgusting works of fiction meant as further propaganda against Germany. As long as the cabal can keep the "evil Germany" lies going, they can continue to hide. Many folks shrug their shoulders about discussions having to do with WWII, claiming it doesn't matter. However, IMO, it's the keystone in exposing the true enemies of the world, with plenty of documentation and evidence for those willing to see.
No, its a very good conversation. These days you just labelled a racist, fasist etc if you try and discuss topics like this. The media is the main problem these days.
Following the consolidation of power, Mao launched the first five-year plan (1953–1958), which emphasised rapid industrial development. Within industry, iron and steel, electric power, coal, heavy engineering, building materials, and basic chemicals were prioritised with the aim of constructing large and highly capital-intensive plants.
In May 1919 an army political agent attended a lecture by economist Dr Gottfried Feder entitled "The Abolition of Interest Servitude." That agent went on to be Chancellor of Germany in the 1930s and he put Feder's ideas into practice.
Shortly after Hitler came to power, we saw headlines like: "Judea Declares War On Germany." Basically, the money-lenders were strongly opposed to any government banning usury, that is, lending money and charging interest.
Now remember how Germany was trying to recover from WW1, the horrendous reparations and raging inflation in which everyone's savings were reduce to almost nothing in less than a year. They did great things between 1933 and 1940. It is amazing what can be done once the shackles of the money-lenders are removed. The first few minutes of this have the details:
Consequently, Hitler had to go. The Poles tortured and killed many Germans who now found themselves living in Poland (Russians living in Ukraine, anyone?) and despite many attempts at a peaceful solution there was a military intervention and that was all the excuse needed for the world to go to war again. Were the Poles told to provoke Germany, one wonders.
I suspect that the history of the "victims" of Germany at that time was written by those victims so as to maximise sympathy and to show Germany and its leadership in a bad light. The moral of the story is: Do not upset the money lenders.
Its so bloody obvious what they are trying to do. The link I provided is just one and its hilarious. Seems the sisterhood is upset because women do not get the credit they deserve for helping Hitler to rise to power. We get a bunch of far left, angry women carrying with a bit of support from some soy boys.
I lasted 15 minutes it was torture but there are a number of documentaries released on Hitler lately and all use the 'make Germany great again' tag constantly along with other attempts to portray MAGA as NAZI.
Of course the irony is Hitler was a socialist.
Not to draw too fine a point on what you said, but national socialism is different from marxist socialism. Hitler went to great length to describe the differences, among them, Germans owned private property.
It's often not accurate to try to compare the NSDAP to socialistic practices of today. It was a different time then, and the world was just beginning to explore types of progressive government differing from monarchies and autocracies. What worked then wouldn't work today, but that period of Germany worked so well they became a successful nation following the Weimar Republic...while the rest of the developed world struggled in the aftermath of the Great Depression.
I know, the main difference is that Hitler used big business as an extension of Govt policy, they were working together.
Now does that remind you of anything?
I think your implication is that government working in concert with large corporations is similar to what is happening today...with tech companies doing the government's bidding to silence unwanted speech. Nothing like that happened in Germany during that time (of course there weren't high-tech firms or the internet like today). Such an action would be unquestionably a negative partnership to harm citizens and gain control of the populace...and, yes, I understand the point you're trying to make.
Germany did its best to silence the propaganda coming from the jewish-owned press, because it was intentionally devised to demoralize the German people and create a negative perception of Germany and Hitler to sway public opinion in the world. But the best Germany could do was counter with positive messaging to encourage the German people and build pride and patriotism.
Since the mark had become worthless because of policies from the Treaty of Versailles and manipulation during the Weimar Republic, Hitler had to find a new basis for Germany's currency. He settled on labor. This is why the German government worked with companies, to build on that system of labor to stabilize and grow the economy. The results were nothing short of staggering, and it was a positive partnership to rebuild the nation from the ashes.
Again, would something like this work today? No, but it was the right decision for the time given the circumstances.
I didn't mean to sidetrack your thread. I just wanted to point out the differences in types of socialism. I haven't watched any of the shows you linked to, but I can imagine that they are disgusting works of fiction meant as further propaganda against Germany. As long as the cabal can keep the "evil Germany" lies going, they can continue to hide. Many folks shrug their shoulders about discussions having to do with WWII, claiming it doesn't matter. However, IMO, it's the keystone in exposing the true enemies of the world, with plenty of documentation and evidence for those willing to see.
No, its a very good conversation. These days you just labelled a racist, fasist etc if you try and discuss topics like this. The media is the main problem these days.
Almost is as we were supposed to repeat the same cycle here after 2008 part 2
Two can play at that game: Regarding Mao Zedong
source
One might say he wanted to build back better.
In May 1919 an army political agent attended a lecture by economist Dr Gottfried Feder entitled "The Abolition of Interest Servitude." That agent went on to be Chancellor of Germany in the 1930s and he put Feder's ideas into practice.
Shortly after Hitler came to power, we saw headlines like: "Judea Declares War On Germany." Basically, the money-lenders were strongly opposed to any government banning usury, that is, lending money and charging interest.
Now remember how Germany was trying to recover from WW1, the horrendous reparations and raging inflation in which everyone's savings were reduce to almost nothing in less than a year. They did great things between 1933 and 1940. It is amazing what can be done once the shackles of the money-lenders are removed. The first few minutes of this have the details:
A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind Chapter 6 - The Rise and Fall of State Banking (1932-1945)
Consequently, Hitler had to go. The Poles tortured and killed many Germans who now found themselves living in Poland (Russians living in Ukraine, anyone?) and despite many attempts at a peaceful solution there was a military intervention and that was all the excuse needed for the world to go to war again. Were the Poles told to provoke Germany, one wonders.
I suspect that the history of the "victims" of Germany at that time was written by those victims so as to maximise sympathy and to show Germany and its leadership in a bad light. The moral of the story is: Do not upset the money lenders.
But they had joy! 🤩