The problem with property tax isn't that it's thievery, but that people don't realize it is thievery.
An act of war is any direct violation of someone's inalienable rights. Thievery is an act of war.
The solution then, is to simply declare war on Bill Gates and take all his shit. That's how Sovereign entities have been doing it since the beginning of humanity.
There is nothing wrong with war. It is a perfectly natural thing. If one entity has horded all the resources there are consequences. Those consequences are that other's will declare war on them and take the resources back.
The problem is that people don't understand that they are Sovereign entities. ALL PEOPLE (including Bill Gates) are Sovereign entities. They have the inalienable Right to defend their property, no matter how they got that property. Bill Gates did not get his farmland without fuckery, but he still has the Right to defend it. We The People can decide that he shouldn't have that land because of the fuckery he employed to gain it. We can then declare war on him and take it.
As Sovereign entities, we have the right to declare war. Such a declaration, and the intended result, are direct violations of another's Rights, but that is not always a bad thing (or rather, it is sometimes a "necessary evil" for social cohesion). Indeed, societies violate individuals Rights all the time. Every time someone goes to jail, or pays a fine, or pays taxes, or a thousand other things we think are "totally normal", that is exactly what is happening: direct violations of someone's Rights AKA acts of war. We push the responsibility of those violations of Rights off to "the government," or "the law," but they are still acts of war from one Sovereign entity onto another.
The shifting of responsibility is the fraud. The responsibility is on us. We are the people who violate another's Rights when society puts someone in jail. Such an act is an act of war, from We The People onto the Sovereign entity that is put in jail. We say, "they deserved it" if we believe they do in fact deserve it, but whether they do or not is irrelevant for this discussion. It is a direct violation of their Rights, no matter what justification we use for that act of war. Such acts of war may be necessary for social cohesion (put a murderer in jail to prevent future murders e.g.). The point is that we must learn to understand that we are the ones responsible for those acts of war, and that the person who is the target of such acts is just as much a Sovereign as those doing the acts. All men are created equallySovereign.
The same rationalization that we use to put a murderer in jail can be used for any act of war, including taking the farm land from a globalist pedophile who lied, cheated, stole, and murdered his way to his land ownership.
The problem with our systems of law and government is not that they are "bad"... well, that is a problem, but it's not the real problem. The real problem is that our systems of law and government obfuscate who exactly is responsible for actions, specifically these acts of war.
People don't understand what Sovereignty means (Ultimate Authority). They don't understand that they are Sovereign (every single one of us). They don't understand what their Jurisdiction is. They don't understand what their inalienable Rights are (such as the Right to Defend their property). They don't understand that there are always consequences for actions, no matter what the law is. Most importantly, they don't understand that the system of "law" that we have is specifically designed to ensure that the greedy can avoid consequences by hiding behind the scam we call "law" and "government".
Make it a law that crimes against humanity is a capitol offense punishable by death and confiscation of all wealth and property. His role with Moderna and the death jab qualfies.
Although I agree with this, it needs to be used judiciously. I mean, the people in my parent's neighborhood decided they didn't like them. They are conservative, the rest of the 'hood seems to be Liberal. My Dad put up "Don't tread on me" flags, the neighbors didn't like it and tried to get them to take it down. After that, everything was a problem. The neighbors waged war on them because of their political views.
They antagonized them, they complained to authorities, they did everything they could until my parents sold their house. They were pushing 80, they didn't need this crap.
So I guess what I'm saying is, we can all agree to wage war on Bill Gates, however people use things like this to wage war for the dumbest reasons.
My parents ended up moving all the way across the country from their family and grandkids. Their choice, they could have moved somewhere else in this state, however they chose to move across the country where we see them now maybe once a year. At our expense, mind you. They moved that far away to be in the "free state of Florida" because they just wanted to get away from our red turned purple turned dark blue state.
Anyhow, waging war sounds good when it's people who really need it, but people use it as a weapon against people they just disagree with, don't like, or just feel like picking on.
Agree but how to solve for all the farmland that has been bought up by Bill Gates etc?
The problem with property tax isn't that it's thievery, but that people don't realize it is thievery.
An act of war is any direct violation of someone's inalienable rights. Thievery is an act of war.
The solution then, is to simply declare war on Bill Gates and take all his shit. That's how Sovereign entities have been doing it since the beginning of humanity.
There is nothing wrong with war. It is a perfectly natural thing. If one entity has horded all the resources there are consequences. Those consequences are that other's will declare war on them and take the resources back.
The problem is that people don't understand that they are Sovereign entities. ALL PEOPLE (including Bill Gates) are Sovereign entities. They have the inalienable Right to defend their property, no matter how they got that property. Bill Gates did not get his farmland without fuckery, but he still has the Right to defend it. We The People can decide that he shouldn't have that land because of the fuckery he employed to gain it. We can then declare war on him and take it.
As Sovereign entities, we have the right to declare war. Such a declaration, and the intended result, are direct violations of another's Rights, but that is not always a bad thing (or rather, it is sometimes a "necessary evil" for social cohesion). Indeed, societies violate individuals Rights all the time. Every time someone goes to jail, or pays a fine, or pays taxes, or a thousand other things we think are "totally normal", that is exactly what is happening: direct violations of someone's Rights AKA acts of war. We push the responsibility of those violations of Rights off to "the government," or "the law," but they are still acts of war from one Sovereign entity onto another.
The shifting of responsibility is the fraud. The responsibility is on us. We are the people who violate another's Rights when society puts someone in jail. Such an act is an act of war, from We The People onto the Sovereign entity that is put in jail. We say, "they deserved it" if we believe they do in fact deserve it, but whether they do or not is irrelevant for this discussion. It is a direct violation of their Rights, no matter what justification we use for that act of war. Such acts of war may be necessary for social cohesion (put a murderer in jail to prevent future murders e.g.). The point is that we must learn to understand that we are the ones responsible for those acts of war, and that the person who is the target of such acts is just as much a Sovereign as those doing the acts. All men are created equally Sovereign.
The same rationalization that we use to put a murderer in jail can be used for any act of war, including taking the farm land from a globalist pedophile who lied, cheated, stole, and murdered his way to his land ownership.
The problem with our systems of law and government is not that they are "bad"... well, that is a problem, but it's not the real problem. The real problem is that our systems of law and government obfuscate who exactly is responsible for actions, specifically these acts of war.
People don't understand what Sovereignty means (Ultimate Authority). They don't understand that they are Sovereign (every single one of us). They don't understand what their Jurisdiction is. They don't understand what their inalienable Rights are (such as the Right to Defend their property). They don't understand that there are always consequences for actions, no matter what the law is. Most importantly, they don't understand that the system of "law" that we have is specifically designed to ensure that the greedy can avoid consequences by hiding behind the scam we call "law" and "government".
The problem with war. It drags in people who don’t have a problem to settle.
This is why the military industrial complex likes war.
They drag in the common citizen into war. That person loses arms or legs.
Once the war is over. The same people who told them to fight don’t care about the fallout.
What needs to happen isn’t a physical war: What needs to happen is no more classified secrets.
We have to declassify everything in my view. So the people can understand how the government really works.
Slyver you fricken' ROCK! Wish there were more folks thinking like you...
Yes!
And there are consequences for freedom. It is very uncomfortable to say no sometimes!
Make it a law that crimes against humanity is a capitol offense punishable by death and confiscation of all wealth and property. His role with Moderna and the death jab qualfies.
Although I agree with this, it needs to be used judiciously. I mean, the people in my parent's neighborhood decided they didn't like them. They are conservative, the rest of the 'hood seems to be Liberal. My Dad put up "Don't tread on me" flags, the neighbors didn't like it and tried to get them to take it down. After that, everything was a problem. The neighbors waged war on them because of their political views.
They antagonized them, they complained to authorities, they did everything they could until my parents sold their house. They were pushing 80, they didn't need this crap.
So I guess what I'm saying is, we can all agree to wage war on Bill Gates, however people use things like this to wage war for the dumbest reasons.
My parents ended up moving all the way across the country from their family and grandkids. Their choice, they could have moved somewhere else in this state, however they chose to move across the country where we see them now maybe once a year. At our expense, mind you. They moved that far away to be in the "free state of Florida" because they just wanted to get away from our red turned purple turned dark blue state.
Anyhow, waging war sounds good when it's people who really need it, but people use it as a weapon against people they just disagree with, don't like, or just feel like picking on.
EO 13818