If Kamala does not have a good performance, her campaign might not be salvageable. The Dems would then have to explore other options, whether that be refusing to certify the election, some unforeseen level of fraud, WW3, a new “pandemic”, black swan event, etc.
There is also the potential that the DNC just swap her out like they did Biden. Legally, the DNC have the authority to replace their candidate post-convention if Kamala were to “step down”, but strategically, I don’t see how the Dems could abandon Kamala after going all-in on her, and so little time left on the clock. It would be a bad look to circumvent democracy AGAIN by selecting a 3rd candidate, but at this point, nothing would surprise me, and their brainwashed sheep will do whatever they are told.
Image is Nate Silver election winner probability model, reflective of Kamala’s drop in polls, specifically in swing states."
I can't tell what the timeline (the X-axis) is supposed to represent. So why has it been truncated? Those vertical dotted and dashed lines must represent something, mostly likely points in time. What are they?
I have a question. If some states are not allowing RFK off ballots, how did Kamala or how would her replacement get on the ballot?
Rules for thee but not for me
Someone must have been listening cause RFK off the ballot in MI and NC!
And NC was set to be first state to start mailing out ballots yesterday. Whoops. Now they have to reprint.
Those ballots are probably already printed! I'm going with Newscum.
NC was already printed and set to start mailing out yesterday. Not anymore!
"I like our position.
If Kamala does not have a good performance, her campaign might not be salvageable. The Dems would then have to explore other options, whether that be refusing to certify the election, some unforeseen level of fraud, WW3, a new “pandemic”, black swan event, etc.
There is also the potential that the DNC just swap her out like they did Biden. Legally, the DNC have the authority to replace their candidate post-convention if Kamala were to “step down”, but strategically, I don’t see how the Dems could abandon Kamala after going all-in on her, and so little time left on the clock. It would be a bad look to circumvent democracy AGAIN by selecting a 3rd candidate, but at this point, nothing would surprise me, and their brainwashed sheep will do whatever they are told.
Image is Nate Silver election winner probability model, reflective of Kamala’s drop in polls, specifically in swing states."
Willie Brown enters the chat...
Dark. Me likey
Time to bring in the Biggest Mike.
Can't wait to see the chart AFTER the debate! 🤣🤣🤣
If they pull something with DJT and this sentencing , there will be no debate ???? They hsvd to do something she can’t talk on live tv
I can't tell what the timeline (the X-axis) is supposed to represent. So why has it been truncated? Those vertical dotted and dashed lines must represent something, mostly likely points in time. What are they?
u/#banhammer
Not seeing this anywhere on 538.