Homosexuality is an actual disease, not simply a mental illness.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧘Mental/Physical Health 🏋🏼♂️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
I think there is a biological component and etiology to homosexuality, but it is not studied or being made public because it is not PC.
That’s gay.
If it were genetic, it would extinguish itself almost immediately.
They don't produce offspring.
They do nowadays.
Cloning or surrogate pregnancies could have never allowed it to survive the millennia. It didn't exist.
People don't like plain facts. But that doesn't change them.
I seem to remember that the youngest sons in families with more than one son are more likely to be gay.
Okay, looks like I remember right. Of course no idea how valid those studies are, and, well, correlation is not causation, but this seems to make at least some sense.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2156010-we-may-know-why-younger-brothers-are-more-likely-to-be-gay/
"The team collected blood from 142 women, and screened it for antibodies to a particular brain protein that is only made in males. They thought this would be a good candidate, because it plays an important role in how neurons communicate with each other, and because it is produced on the surface of brain cells, making it relatively easy for antibodies to find and detect it.
They found that the mothers of gay sons with older brothers had the highest levels of antibodies against this protein, followed by the mothers of gay sons with no older brothers. Women who had straight sons had less of these antibodies, while women with no sons had the least."
Seems to be called "The big brother effect".
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg17723884-900-the-big-brother-effect/
This is of course something that would be liked well enough these days because it makes homosexuality look quite natural, and something you can't do anything about unless you start to advocate that women will not have many boys. But frankly, it actually would make at least some sense biologically too, when you think in terms of the relatively small hunter-gatherer bands - fewer men competing for the women, some of them turned into kind of worker bees that would still benefit the group, the same way women past menopause are presumed to do even if they can no longer have babies.
Thanks for the reminder. I'm the gay youngest son with one older brother, there's only five years between us, both same parents and both brought up basically the same environmentally etc, and I certainly was never abused. I've never felt the need to overthink it really though do remember hearing about that theory/study in the past and finding it intriguing. Women should be encouraged to try for more sons then, for the greater good (in an actual good sense, not the commie one!)
I remember these studies, it would appear possibly to be a biological ebrake like Okaaay Susan youv already had 4 straight sons you've flooded the gene pool now your on your 5th child? Pump the brakes.