Is this the Great Awakening or the Great Misleading?
How the absolute heck does this mean anything? Why is this pinned???
Someone makes a video and says:
"a visibly angry Klaus Schwab told WEF members that they must keep trying to assassinate Trump and if they miss, “shoot shoot shoot until the job is done.”
Showing a still picture of Klaus the Schwab?
There is zero sauce to this whatsoever.
Mods, please stop pinning stuff that has no sauce!!!!
Pedes, no sauce, no evidence = nonsense
Stop falling for this nonsense!
Sean Adl-Tabatabai ruined the David Icke forum and David's TV channel, The People's Voice. These days he makes a living making things up that appeal to people like members of this forum. He does it to waste our time and spread confusion. A lot of times there is a "too good to be true" quality to the disinfo as we see here.
If you want to know more about this channel/website/operation, search for "clickbait" in the community search section and check out my posts on Newspunch / The people's voice / Yournewswire. (This operation has gone through three iterations so far.)
Done a lot of digging on this mob. They aren't controlled oppo. They are a straight out clickbait and disinformation operation.
I know about this source, much more than most around here. I was encouraged and happy, frankly, that you objected to the post based purely on the content and the way it is presented, and not on source.
Me, I'm biased big time against the source (and I think my bias is very justified), but that bias evolved based on analysis of the very straight forward kind you express in your comment.
Kudos.
PS. I think a mod removed it from the board feed after I (or maybe others too) deported it. It wasn't deleted, but it disappeared from the board feed. I think that makes sense, because the criticisms and discussion re: the post have value, even if the post itself is a piling of steaming garbage.
I truly wish the mods would have a rule that every pinned post must be verified beyond one reference from a single questionable source. This is out of hand.
I have suggested (and recommended) in the past that a Sticky protocol be developed for the mods to be able to apply and follow.
The mods are ALL volunteers, and they do a pretty good - not to mention crucial - job, but I get the feeling that by and large, there is no single unified approach to Stickying applied across the whole mod team. And if there is, there are certainly some weird outliers. Some of the stuff that gets stickied.... Sheesh.
Having a protocol in place would surely help. Mods could more easily refer to such when doing stickies. Here, by protocol, I mean what would essentially be a formally compiled set of guidelines for screening and evaluating the Stickyness of posts, designed for practical application.
I would like to see the formulation of such a protocol undertaken as a community project, by which I mean, a post or series of posts where the board could offer their suggestions, opinions and ideas for such a protocol (including ideas of what stickied posts should conform to or how they should be evaluated for 'stickworthiness') and then a team could even draft them up for submission for the mod team to then discuss and decide on or if they wish to adopt them as a formal protocol.
I think such would help to a) engaging the community in taking more ownership of the board by way of supporting the mod team, and b) make things easier for the mod team, by not requiring them to do all the hard work for something that is not direct modding, but rather is administrative or organizational conceptualization, and c) help to improve overall board quality if applied.
After almost quarter of a century on the Net and involvement in a significant number of long-lasting and successful internet communities, I hold fast to the conviction that the optimum foundation for long-term success and longevity of a net community (either forum, mailing list, board or group) is the relationship between the mod team (or owners) and the community that engages in that forum/board/list/group.
I personally think that after two attempts already, every bit of information regarding another should be taken serious, regardless of one's own opinion on the credibility of such threat. It would be far better to prepare for that threat and it never happen rather than dismiss it as non credible and then it does happen.
That's kind of silly. Disinfo is disinfo, one must learn to sort. You could write an article warning Trump that every 5'7" Caucasian male with a curly black mustache is an assassin out to get him. Doesn't mean he should give that any credit. Based on what you are saying, Trump should hide in a bunker until after the election. And then, for the rest of his life really. What he is doing is risky business.
That's a pretty big jump to an extreme there to say that Trump should hide in a bunker until after the election based off me saying that his security should take all threats into consideration.
What i learned in the marines was that no, not every Arab overseas is trying to kill me, but, you prepare as if they are and you are ready to respond and engage at any moment. You never let your guard down. The moment you do, is when something bad happens.
I'm simply thinking along the lines of it's better to have a gun and not need it than to need it and not have it. You're thinking along the lines of "i don't need to carry today because I don't think this particular grocery store I'm shopping at has any credible threats in it". Which is fine, we just operate differently.
I still have a guy that was directing me to awakened content on the internet telling me we will be able to retire anyday now as soon as nesara/gesara comes through with the giant checks for everybody...
Is this the Great Awakening or the Great Misleading?
How the absolute heck does this mean anything? Why is this pinned??? Someone makes a video and says: "a visibly angry Klaus Schwab told WEF members that they must keep trying to assassinate Trump and if they miss, “shoot shoot shoot until the job is done.” Showing a still picture of Klaus the Schwab? There is zero sauce to this whatsoever.
Mods, please stop pinning stuff that has no sauce!!!!
Pedes, no sauce, no evidence = nonsense Stop falling for this nonsense!
The dude's bitchute channel gives me controlled Ops bibes.
Sean Adl-Tabatabai ruined the David Icke forum and David's TV channel, The People's Voice. These days he makes a living making things up that appeal to people like members of this forum. He does it to waste our time and spread confusion. A lot of times there is a "too good to be true" quality to the disinfo as we see here.
If you want to know more about this channel/website/operation, search for "clickbait" in the community search section and check out my posts on Newspunch / The people's voice / Yournewswire. (This operation has gone through three iterations so far.)
Done a lot of digging on this mob. They aren't controlled oppo. They are a straight out clickbait and disinformation operation.
Thank you for being a voice of reason! Here's another such post from yesterday:
https://greatawakening.win/p/1994yJwLMf/from-an-article-posted-aug-30-20/
Yes.
The People's Voice bullshite
u/aslan_is_0n_the_m0ve/, who's side are you on?
https://greatawakening.win/p/16a9qIDKA0/newspunch--know-your-clickbait-a/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b6Rbli8W/know-your-clickbait-the-peoples-/
Thank you!
I know about this source, much more than most around here. I was encouraged and happy, frankly, that you objected to the post based purely on the content and the way it is presented, and not on source.
Me, I'm biased big time against the source (and I think my bias is very justified), but that bias evolved based on analysis of the very straight forward kind you express in your comment.
Kudos.
PS. I think a mod removed it from the board feed after I (or maybe others too) deported it. It wasn't deleted, but it disappeared from the board feed. I think that makes sense, because the criticisms and discussion re: the post have value, even if the post itself is a piling of steaming garbage.
I truly wish the mods would have a rule that every pinned post must be verified beyond one reference from a single questionable source. This is out of hand.
It's a very good idea.
I have suggested (and recommended) in the past that a Sticky protocol be developed for the mods to be able to apply and follow.
The mods are ALL volunteers, and they do a pretty good - not to mention crucial - job, but I get the feeling that by and large, there is no single unified approach to Stickying applied across the whole mod team. And if there is, there are certainly some weird outliers. Some of the stuff that gets stickied.... Sheesh.
Having a protocol in place would surely help. Mods could more easily refer to such when doing stickies. Here, by protocol, I mean what would essentially be a formally compiled set of guidelines for screening and evaluating the Stickyness of posts, designed for practical application.
I would like to see the formulation of such a protocol undertaken as a community project, by which I mean, a post or series of posts where the board could offer their suggestions, opinions and ideas for such a protocol (including ideas of what stickied posts should conform to or how they should be evaluated for 'stickworthiness') and then a team could even draft them up for submission for the mod team to then discuss and decide on or if they wish to adopt them as a formal protocol.
I think such would help to a) engaging the community in taking more ownership of the board by way of supporting the mod team, and b) make things easier for the mod team, by not requiring them to do all the hard work for something that is not direct modding, but rather is administrative or organizational conceptualization, and c) help to improve overall board quality if applied.
After almost quarter of a century on the Net and involvement in a significant number of long-lasting and successful internet communities, I hold fast to the conviction that the optimum foundation for long-term success and longevity of a net community (either forum, mailing list, board or group) is the relationship between the mod team (or owners) and the community that engages in that forum/board/list/group.
Idealistic, but there it is.
u/propertyofUniverse
u/fatality
u/lonewulf
etc
I personally think that after two attempts already, every bit of information regarding another should be taken serious, regardless of one's own opinion on the credibility of such threat. It would be far better to prepare for that threat and it never happen rather than dismiss it as non credible and then it does happen.
The source is a KNOWN disinfo * clickbait operation with a LONG history of disinfo ops.
For analysis on this source, see:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16a9qIDKA0/newspunch--know-your-clickbait-a/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b6Rbli8W/know-your-clickbait-the-peoples-/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16bPeWhp8I/know-your-clickbait-newspunch-cl/
That's kind of silly. Disinfo is disinfo, one must learn to sort. You could write an article warning Trump that every 5'7" Caucasian male with a curly black mustache is an assassin out to get him. Doesn't mean he should give that any credit. Based on what you are saying, Trump should hide in a bunker until after the election. And then, for the rest of his life really. What he is doing is risky business.
That's a pretty big jump to an extreme there to say that Trump should hide in a bunker until after the election based off me saying that his security should take all threats into consideration.
What i learned in the marines was that no, not every Arab overseas is trying to kill me, but, you prepare as if they are and you are ready to respond and engage at any moment. You never let your guard down. The moment you do, is when something bad happens.
I'm simply thinking along the lines of it's better to have a gun and not need it than to need it and not have it. You're thinking along the lines of "i don't need to carry today because I don't think this particular grocery store I'm shopping at has any credible threats in it". Which is fine, we just operate differently.
Do we dare hope that members of the WEF recently acquired new pagers?
LOL
Or dress them up as cats.
LOL...that would work too.
“Paging Dr Fauci”📣
Seems like if you terrify people about DYING because they go to a rally, they won’t go, right?
Yea, I’d still go, and I’d see all of you there too I’m sure! WWG1WGA!
this is the way
Why do you keep putting up tpvsean bullshit?
Drone strikes for all of the WEF
The People's Voice bullshite.
u/aslan_is_0n_the_m0ve/, who's side are you on?
https://greatawakening.win/p/16a9qIDKA0/newspunch--know-your-clickbait-a/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b6Rbli8W/know-your-clickbait-the-peoples-/
Who is going to plant the bomb? FBI? CIA? Maybe the USSS?
I WILL HIT THEM WITH MY NINJER! 🤬
I wonder if this would wake up the military to take visible action.
I still have a guy that was directing me to awakened content on the internet telling me we will be able to retire anyday now as soon as nesara/gesara comes through with the giant checks for everybody...