True, that
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
There was a lot of work done in the 50s to restore it and make sure ppl didn't get squished. That is a picture of one that was reinforced.
https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/inspire-me/blog/blog-posts/excavation-restoration-stonehenge-1950s-60s/
There are plenty of document recording this.
Or.... that's just what they want you to think, and the truth is the whole thing was faked in the 1950s or 60s. Those photos sure look like they're building it to me.
I wouldn't trust "English Heritage" as far as I could throw it. It's a department of the woke National Trust intended to, well, censor and destroy actual English heritage
That was just the first of many I found. I know, we all know, we have been lied to about our history. I just find this one far fetched. There is documentation of Stonehenge prior to the 50s. Are they fake documents, maybe, idk... I'm just pointing out what this picture is.
https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/stonehenge-oldest-photo-intl-scli-gbr/index.html
Though I agree with the "all lies" sentiment. Not sure I see the purpose in this being a lie. Meanwhile, though...look at Helen Keller not being deaf and blind....hilarious they got us all to believe that.
What! HK was not deaf and blind????? This is a first for me.
Challenge every thing.
Is that concrete? When did they do that?
Yes, exactly, modern concrete (or just cement) over a steel core.
Thousands of years old, I think not. The whole thing is a recent fake.
Best guess- it was made in the 1960s. That's when it first started getting marketed as a tourist site/satanic temple. Did you know there was no car park or road access before then? Of course, that could be out by a few decades (no way to know) but not much longer.
This is England - nothing unusual about that.
Hey, I love a good conspiracy theory and questioning the narrative is always healthy. I think in this case you have missed the mark and it's a little embarrassing for those of us who think this way.
Stonehenge is a huge international landmark and it was crumbling. So it was supported by steel beams over fifty years ago so that when people visit they are not just looking at piles of stone laying on the ground.
This is no different than seeing the steel rods that hold up a T-rex skeleton at a museum. It would be silly to the imply that T-rex are not real because they have steel rods holding up the skeleton.
Both T-Rex and Stonehenge may or may not be real but the steel has nothing to do with it.
Posts like this do not help the overall awakening movement and instead causes outsiders to laugh us off as lunatics.... or maybe this was your purpose.
Well said. I have a feeling a mod will see this and OP will be escorted to conspiracies dot win, even though I find these posts kinda fun in their own little way.