What i cannot reconcile in my mind is why would a pharmaceutical drug such as ivermectin, be effective against nano microchips or whatever the hell it is that she is saying is in the clot shots?
It isn't. The clot shots have multiple things in them. We have learned about different supplements that help fight or clear these different things.
Ivermectin fights off the lipid wall breaking parts of the manmade bioweapon which insert spike proteins and other junk into the cells. Zinc is important as a helper here, blocking the attack sites.
Nattokinase helps take out the spike proteins, while all the supplements that support immune system front line fighters help this and other parts as well. Natto also lowers blood pressure without all the big pharma side effects, so if course they tell you not to take it if you're taking cholesterol or blood pressure meds. I know now several people who were able to get off those meds by starting a regimen of natto.
N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) helps the body produce glutathione, which clears toxins from the bloodstream like graphene oxide.
I don't know why anti-parasite meds like ivermectin, fenbendazole, mebendazole do so much good against so many things like cancer and bioweapons, but they do, which means that collectively the medical industry either knows next to nothing or has been hiding a heck of a lot from everyone. Or both
Cancer is uncontrolled harmful growth of our own cells. It always happens in all of us, but normal healthy systems clean it out. If enough damage is sustained by our systems, such as from radiation, malnourishment, toxins and/or parasites, we are no longer able to maintain ourselves.
Thus there are many kinds of cancer, and unless the sources of the damage to our immune systems are resolved, it will absolutely return. Radiative and chemical attacks upon us, such as "chemotherapy" will cause lasting damage and make the body more susceptible to all sorts of problems, including harder cancer.
Im not trying to argue with anybody. I've read so much i can't keep it straight anymore. I just thought i remembered a protocol to get rid of vax included IVM. These evil bastards all need put to death. That's all i know.
Based on what advanced biochemists know, no. Lots of very geeky sci-fi explored that idea. But everything on this planet seems to be, and it's not yet fully apparent why that is. It's almost as if it were specially designed by a super genius or something... Which is probably why every serious scientist in the real world that I've ever encountered is a true believer in intelligent design and usually extremely religious.
I guess you'd have to define lifeforms. Would you consider a robot with AI a lifeform? I just wonder how ivermectin would do anything to nanochips. What mechanism would make Ivermctin effective against a computer chip? Rhetorical question because I doubt any one on here can come up with that answer.
What i cannot reconcile in my mind is why would a pharmaceutical drug such as ivermectin, be effective against nano microchips or whatever the hell it is that she is saying is in the clot shots?
It isn't. The clot shots have multiple things in them. We have learned about different supplements that help fight or clear these different things.
Ivermectin fights off the lipid wall breaking parts of the manmade bioweapon which insert spike proteins and other junk into the cells. Zinc is important as a helper here, blocking the attack sites.
Nattokinase helps take out the spike proteins, while all the supplements that support immune system front line fighters help this and other parts as well. Natto also lowers blood pressure without all the big pharma side effects, so if course they tell you not to take it if you're taking cholesterol or blood pressure meds. I know now several people who were able to get off those meds by starting a regimen of natto.
N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) helps the body produce glutathione, which clears toxins from the bloodstream like graphene oxide.
I don't know why anti-parasite meds like ivermectin, fenbendazole, mebendazole do so much good against so many things like cancer and bioweapons, but they do, which means that collectively the medical industry either knows next to nothing or has been hiding a heck of a lot from everyone. Or both
Cancer is a parasite infection.
Parasite Pill 2.0
Stages of Parasite infection:
Parasites infect local tissues [Stage 1}
Rapid Parasite growth >>> Parasites burrow deeply into local tissues [Stage 2]
Parasites protect themselves by infecting/damaging lymph nodes [Stage 3]
Parasites get into blood stream and spread to other parts of body – metastaic [Stage 4]
No active parasites but inactive parasite larva which may activate years later [Remission]
What other common disease has 4 stages and a remission state? [Cancer]
Cancer is uncontrolled harmful growth of our own cells. It always happens in all of us, but normal healthy systems clean it out. If enough damage is sustained by our systems, such as from radiation, malnourishment, toxins and/or parasites, we are no longer able to maintain ourselves.
Thus there are many kinds of cancer, and unless the sources of the damage to our immune systems are resolved, it will absolutely return. Radiative and chemical attacks upon us, such as "chemotherapy" will cause lasting damage and make the body more susceptible to all sorts of problems, including harder cancer.
Im not trying to argue with anybody. I've read so much i can't keep it straight anymore. I just thought i remembered a protocol to get rid of vax included IVM. These evil bastards all need put to death. That's all i know.
Can lifeforms only be carbon based?
Based on what advanced biochemists know, no. Lots of very geeky sci-fi explored that idea. But everything on this planet seems to be, and it's not yet fully apparent why that is. It's almost as if it were specially designed by a super genius or something... Which is probably why every serious scientist in the real world that I've ever encountered is a true believer in intelligent design and usually extremely religious.
I guess you'd have to define lifeforms. Would you consider a robot with AI a lifeform? I just wonder how ivermectin would do anything to nanochips. What mechanism would make Ivermctin effective against a computer chip? Rhetorical question because I doubt any one on here can come up with that answer.