Q told us the military was the only way. Dave from X22 has told us a thousand times, the military is the only way. When you think about the vast number of evil entities attempting to destroy the USA, (MSM, 3 letter agencies, corporations, social media, Zionist, Marxist, Globalist, UN, WEF, ect), can you understand why the military was the only way?
However, the Posse Comitatus Act bars federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement on American soil.
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/posse-comitatus-act-explained
Certain laws had to be lifted to allow the military the authority to conduct operations on domestic soil. The Insurrection Act is what gave the military the authority.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act_of_1807
Trump needed a coup or a Insurrection to sign the Insurrection Act. Trump could not get the military and military intelligence participation if he WON the election.
Military intelligence takes over control of 3 letter agencies after the Insurrection Act is signed. The prerequisite to signing the Insurrection Act had to be a stolen election.
Bret Baier participated in the Democrat Insurrection but you have to ask yourself if he was instructed to call the Arizona election results before the votes were countend. Who instructed him?
I said earlier, Bret was a well respected conservative journalist before calling the Arizona election. Calling the election early for Biden would almost guarantee Trump the ability to engage the military.
Given the way he grilled Kamala couple days ago tells me he has been working within the Democrat party as a counter insurgent.
You must read Q post 14, 22, 23, 28 and 34. Q tells you what was going to happen, before it happened.
Have a good day!
Brett Baier did not call Arizona during the 2020 election. He, Martha McCallum, and Bill Hemmer actually argued on air with Chris Stirewalt when the call was made. Their position was there was no possible way Arizona could be called that early.
The three of them remained skeptical even after Fox put their “Decision Desk” expert Arnon Mishkin on air. It was Mishkin and Stirewalt who spun the narrative that Biden had won Arizona.
Thanks. Reality must take a back seat when emotion is driving.
Well, golly gee! I wished someone needs to tell all of the GAW that BEFORE we gotten our panties in a bunch when he get set to interview Kamala, because so many here are convinced he was a RINO!
These instances of friendly fire isn't good for GAW!
I’m just telling the truth. I remember it like it was yesterday. But, I think the basic point is valid, it just wasn’t Baier, it was someone higher up at Fox News who staged the theater.
And I appreciate you telling the truth, it is just that I am a bit annoyed that virtually all of the GAW, every Anon, and the rest of the MAGA influencer base just went out and attacked a man based on emotional impulse, and not on evidence.
Such things is a disgrace to what we stand for.
I agree, there was no need to attack him.
If we really believe there is a plan in place and moves and countermoves are anticipated, we never need to execute a full frontal assault. We need to focus on being persuasive in a way that those still asleep will actually hear. When we attack, they close up like a clam.
Reducing the criticisms of Baier to the calling of Arizona is out of touch, and I will continue to think it's pathetic that people prove they're not as awakened as they think when the same old strategy of doing ONE positive thing seems to outweigh all of the negative things they've done still works on them.
Baier has not been very pro Trump for years. When people criticize him, they are criticizing him for those years. That he was at the desk is just a galvanizing focal point for vocalizing those frustrations.
No. One positive thing does not outweigh negatives. Anyone who thinks that it does is still asleep, and may as well vote for their next RINO when they are up for reelection and start to do something. Hell, it clearly worked for Empress Whitmer in Michigan.
It is hard to say though. We know Fox News is full of traitors, rotten to the core. They will throw us a bone every once in a while, but when it comes to important issues, they seem to always side with the MSM. I think the interview was done to try and make Kamala look weak, so then when she "wins" they will paint her as the underdog. We need to stop watching Fox News and open our eyes to the truth.
I agree, it could absolutely be a play to make her seem like the underdog. After all, she was just fielding criticisms that Trump was the only one going on hostile networks, and Fox is their "hostile" network.
A case of "Shoot! Ready! Aim!"
I recall watching, and with something absurd like only 1% of the vote being in, Brett making a statement that it was going to Biden according to his sources. That sticks in my head. Maybe it was another state but the scenario of 1% and him calling it is what I remember. Mandela Effect?
That was Virginia.
I remember that, too. Couldn't believe it!
I remember watching him as the anchor on election night with the vote tally on the bottom right screen SUBTRACTING votes from Trump and Baer not even blinking.