What is occurring here is not inflation. We are told that inflation occurs when there is is an excess in the money supply and money circulation.
But how could this be when most people are struggling and not getting pay raises to match the rate of price increases? If there is too much money in circulation then it suggests that average people have a big wallet and are willing to pay above the normal rate for a good or service.
There may be more money in the hands of the rich, but if it's not in the hands of the people then its not "in circulation". According to what we are told about inflation the prices are rising higher and tuned towards what consumers are willing to pay with the increase of circulated money supply. If it is not with those consumers then we can't say that there is more money in circulation that is causing the price increases.
Just think about it. The narrative that there is too much money in circulation is nonsense.
What is actually occurring is artificial scarcity of energy, causing all prices to go up in all sectors. Electricity, gasoline, and other fuels have all seen sky high prices largely due to purposeful government regulation. The government is causing the crisis and are lying to us that it is inflation.
The question is, who is doing it and why. Keeping with Q mythos, I find it likely that the White Hats are using this as part of the "We must pass through the darkness, to reach the light" plan.
Have you forgotten how many billions have been printed and sent to Ukraine and Israel in the past few years? Also you're basically parroting the Bernie Boi "inflation doesn't exist, it's all price gouging" explanation.
He never said it was price gouging.
If White Hats are in control then this is false and the money is somehow being redirected or repurposed elsewhere.
However, even if it is true that people are stealing money with corruption, it is still obvious that prices are not going up because we have too much money in our wallets and have too much to spend. There is not more money in circulation among consumers - this is a blatant falsity. The inflation narrative is false. Prices must be increasing for a different reason.
no, he's right. inflation is theft. the money is printed, and used for whatever purpose the government wants. because more money is being used by the gov't without anything of value being created, the cost of goods rises.
it's the same picture, except the money is not in our wallets; it's overseas and underground.
and i don't believe white hat control would preclude any of this... because the plan serves to wake people up and expose the corruption....and there must be a certain timing to it.
Inflation occurs when there is too much money in circulation among consumers. A few rich people hoarding/stealing money doesn't cut it. Since you accept that there is not more money in our wallets then you are suggesting that the inflation crisis does not exist and that the price increases are occurring through a different mechanism.
There are many ways for prices to increase through mechanisms other than inflation. The media and government are pretending that there is only one mechanism, dumbing down the public.
Correct.
There are 100 bushels of corn.
There are 100 dollars.
Each dollar buys a busher of corn.
khazarian 'central bank' prints 100 more dollars.
Now each dollar buys half a bushel of corn.
Production didn't rise (how can it? by printing?) but the 'money' supply did.
Rinse & repeat, since 1913.
so your saying that more money makes it worth less. I thank you for making this make sense
Not if the money they print never enters circulation.
The dollars the central bank prints would have to get into general circulation among the public for that to be true. Ie. we would have too much money in our wallets and the sellers are taking advantage of being able to selling it for a higher price.
This is not what is happening. Vendors are selling it for a higher price because they are being forced to by up-chain suppliers, who in turn have higher manufacture and transporting costs. Those costs are due to higher energy prices.
It is not a coincidence that $5+ gallon gas is associated with higher costs. It is energy costs as the cause for this, not the big wallets of consumers.
Higher energy costs by design yes.
But also, check the housing prices. 2019 vs now. 2, or 3x in some places? Why? Who's buying?
The ones that GRAB THE PRINTED TOKENS FIRST do. I.e. the deep state insiders. They get the printed dollars first and buy stuff up so the rest of the prices go up as a result.
It's a wombo combo. There are at least 2x the dollars in circulation now than in 2019 (and this happened on Trump's watch mind you). That AND the higher prices which are partly due to the doubling of the $ and partly due to the anti-energy policies of the satanists, plus the embargo on the russians, is what has caused this fustercluck.
But there is no denying that the overdrive printing has caused the stupid prices. And unbridled greed in many cases. A scoop of ice cream for $8 is not 'energy', it's just greed. The seller knows the AFFLUENT buyers are flush in tokens (from the printing press) so he is ok selling to them, at those prices.
Who cares about the plebs?
This is called brazilification and it is the result of massive inflation theft AND tyrrany/oligarchy.
The topics you are talking about are unrelated. This topic of inflation and energy costs affecting prices most directly relates to generic commodities.
The only ice cream that costs $8+ a scoop are at designer ice cream outlets that advertise designer brands with custom topping options. This is a special thing, which also existed 10 and 20 years ago. The costs of this type of ice cream is more related to consumer psychology -- selling the 'event' of eating the ice cream in a desert parlor, and is less related to inflation or energy costs.
Housing prices been increasing drastically every decade since the 1980's. It is a dynamic that is not directly connected to inflation. People are not earning more over the years to match those increases, and nor are they earning more to match the increases in the past few years. When you buy a house you are not using the money in your present wallet, but what you promise to pay in the future. The banks act as gatekeepers for what they will allow you to borrow to finance your purchase. The banks can make mistakes in being too loose with the loans, which can cause a housing bubble and increase prices, ultimately crashing the housing market, as what happened in 2008.
Go back 4 years. How much money flooded into the economy during COVID? The insane unemployment benefits and other attempts to keep the economy going. I don't remember the exact figures, but as one example, at one point I was calculating my mother in law was paid $60 an hour to NOT work her minimum wage job.
People were spending tons of money doing home improvements, since they didn't have anything else to do. In the neighborhood I lived in at that time, I saw lots of neighbors outside every day working on their homes.
Anyway, inflation started back then, it isn't a recent thing. What you're describing and we're experiencing now, is the result of inflation, not the start or cause of inflation.
Incorrect. In order for the inflation narrative to be valid you would have to argue that we are all earning 30%+ more over the past few years, which is ridiculously false.
Not only that but if the money we printed during covid had entered circulation, incomes would have risen by 500% by now, and prices would have followed suit. We wouldn’t be seeing 30% inflation over here and almost no inflation over there. Housing prices haven’t climbed due to inflation, but by Blackrock and Vanguard buying up real estate all over the country at 20-30% above market value for the past 8 years.
You don't have even a tentative grasp of economics and it shows.
He actually does and he’s right. Whatever is happening was meant to look like inflation to the uneducated, and it worked, and this is a good thing. Definitely looking more like a white hat psyop to wake up the masses the more I think about it,
Anyone with a grasp of economics would know that if prices went up 30% over the past three years, inflation theory would say that we as a group are earning 30% more in our work and have more money floating around to drive the costs, which is false.
You probably also belief the narrative that housing costs are related to inflation, despite that wages aren't rising as fast as the costs of housing. It is also false that housing costs are related to inflation.
You are correct. Way to pay attention in Econ 101. Clearly many didn’t. Or never even took the course.
We have actually printed, since right before Covid until around 2023, 5x the amount of money that had ever existed prior to that moment. Had that been released into circulation we would all have thought it was the greatest thing ever for about three years, as all of our incomes would have increased by 4-5x…until the prices followed suit, and then to avoid deflation we would have needed to hyperinflate the currency into oblivion and start over.
But that didn’t happen, because, like you said, that money never made it into circulation. Plus, if it were really inflation, and not energy suppression, everything would have gone up in price, not just energy and food, which seems to be hit the hardest. I took my gf shopping the other day and was surprised to see that clothing prices right now are still pretty damn close to where they were when I was in high school 22 years ago. If inflation was happening, those prices would have risen right along with everything else, driven by higher incomes across the board, which, you astutely point out, is not the case.
It LOOKS a little like inflation, but it’s not. I’m very curious to know what happened to the 20 trillion dollars we printed during Covid and right after, because it sure as shit didn’t enter circulation, that’s for damn sure.
Income hasn't kept up with inflation since like the 80's so I don't know how that is supposed to be proof of anything.
It's proof that it's not inflation and that they are lying to you about the cause.
Its the money. Iys in. Circulation digitally as well as physically
This is not an issue of either/or but both/and.
It's the FED, Stupid, By Tom Mullen explains it for the novice:
https://tommullentalksfreedom.com/featured/its-the-fed-stupid/
Everything about our society is artificial. That's how it can be manipulated. What were seeing now is the beginning of the end result of fiat fractional reserve banking. This was always the intended goal.
Its 97 % devalued paper. Unbacked. This is called mental illness. It needs to collapse to 0. Blockchain will replace it along with a blockchain US mail assigned postal box to facilitate voting. Otherwise the country dies upon Kamalas election, by design, in extreme embarassment.
Contrary, Trump, upon election would have to confiscate the assets of the criminals to rebuild the country upon executions and considerably smaller government. We would honor our Foreign Loans, float them out 100yrs at .05% leveraged by tarrifs. He would then assign a flat tax of 10%, abolish the IRS & award each person 1$ Million and 10 acres of land from the Government hoard. Done, problem solved, crisis overted.
I agree