Some historically Dem demographics had lower turnouts:
- urban voters
- women
Do you believe it? Or were they trying to explain how the total popular vote is lower than in 2020?
Some historically Dem demographics had lower turnouts:
Do you believe it? Or were they trying to explain how the total popular vote is lower than in 2020?
That would be explained by the "awakening" process. It does not flip people 180 degrees all at once. First, it just encourages them to disengage from their former narratives as they gradually wake up... in other words, they stay home and don't vote.
Over time, more and more may actually shift over to our MAGA/MAHA narrative.
Like dumbasses who voted R for President but somehow still voted D for governor and such, though I suspect a lot of that is just fraud.
NO, I'm waiting for the X-37 results.
The first step in rehab is denial. It's ok. You can ignore reality, but not the consequences of ignoring reality.
Maybe some were definitely NOT voting Trump, cuz that's how they were programmed. However they saw the only 2 dumbasses the dems offered up and couldn't see voting for them either, hence stay home and hide.
Definition of trying to " explain " = lying repeatedly until ppl believe it's true.
Nope. If anything I think her 66 million votes are fake.
Nearly 30M less total votes than 2020. That's a lot of missing mail ballot fraud plus looks like the illegals didn't help much after all.
It WAS lower turnout for the Democrats. By a lot. But that doesn't explain the numbers.
Based purely on common sense, no way did Trump get fewer votes this time around (71 vs. 74). That means they must have increased the electronic vote flipping this time around. But you can only do that in certain places and to a small degree. A hand count will reveal electronic fraud like this, so this system of cheating has hard limits if you want to avoid detection. You can only pump it up in places where hand counts are expensive and difficult to qualify for.
My guess is Trump legitimately got around 80 million votes this time, so if true that means they were able to swap about 9 million to Harris. (That assumes they didn't e-swap any in 2020, which is unlikely but we'll go with it for the moment.)
That pushes her numbers down to around 58 million. And that was the best they could do, because they were prevented in many places from bringing in pallets of fake ballots like they did in 2020 when the electronic rigging was insufficient. They almost certainly stuffed the mail in ballot areas like New York and the Left Coast, but nothing like what they were able to pull off last time.
Overall, I suspect Harris maybe got, legitimately, around 40 million votes to Trump's 80. 2:1 matches what most people report anecdotally.
So yes, the number is probably that low because nobody was inspired to vote for her. Urban voters and women were just one demographic that said no.
My precinct had the highest turnout I have ever seen. Guys on crutches and ladies with walkers were helped in line by family and friends to vote. It was marvellous to see with my own God-given eyes.
Friend of mine was a poll worker and said she's never had such a busy election day before.