I need help with sauce for a librat.
💊 RED PILL 💊
So I’m in a battle with a coworker that is most likely a DACA immigrant. He is claiming that 47 is pushing a denaturalization program that is going to deport all citizens. I have told him this has been happening through many administrations and it’s only for people who either lied on their initial paperwork or have broken the rules they swore to uphold. Does anyone have any sauce I can send him to help me prove my point.?
WUT? Let HIM provide the sauce.
Exactly. Trump will deport illegals. If the guy is under some delusion about Trump planning to deport legal resident's of the USA, then he needs to prove his bullshit claim.
However, Trump should absolutely be looking into the acceleration of approvals that has happened under "Biden".
Also, I still don't personally believe that deportation should be off the table for people who commit crimes after achieving citizenship, but that's at least firmly in the wishful thinking column.
I hope he's generous with the definition of "illegal" because the obnoxious anchor babies (aka now grown ass libshits) need to fuck right off too.
If he has been brought in by his illegal parents as a minor he is as illegal as they are
Stephen Miller was talking about it, ‘Denaturilization Project’ but like OP said, it’s in the event of breaking the law.
Stephen Miller’s tweet: https://x.com/StephenM/status/1712094935820780029?lang=en
Adding info for context:
In the United States, citizenship can be revoked (denaturalization) or lost (expatriation) under certain circumstances. However, revocation is rare and typically reserved for extreme cases, such as:
So if they break one of these items mentioned above they can potentially have their citizenship revoked. It's not just pointing the deportation cannon at someone brown and zapping them back to their home country which is what the media has programmed the Left to believe.
There could be an argument if there were methods used to fast track someones citizenship without proper due process and procedure, then that citizenship could be at risk for concealment of facts if later it's determined they failed to meet the needed criteria.
Yep. It's way easier to deboonk a lousy source than find proof that a lousy source is lying. It generally uncovers a lack of understanding on a topic, too. That can lead the way to education.
When the leftists would cry about "Trump's Project 2025," I would always ask for proof Trump has anything to do with it. The "best" claims came from people in his administration going to work for a think tank that wrote it. Usually they'd calm down after realizing that 1) Think tanks would naturally hire people with high level government jobs, and these people needed to go find new jobs, and 2) Just because you work for somebody doesn't mean your positions align today or for the rest of eternity.
The worst claims were outright agit prop. No wonder people were freaking out. I taught a few people how agit prop works and they were able to calm down after seeing how it works. Hopefully they learn to deal with other forms of propaganda.
With the anxiety level down, it's "Here's video of Trump denying Project 2025, directing people to Agenda 47. Can you find any video of him endorsing Project 2025?" Nobody could, because it doesn't exist. The natural follow up - "What seems like a better source to you? The man's own words, or the harmful agit prop meant to cause you undue anxiety and mental anguish?"
For those that were not reasonable and otherwise trying to rally the leftist tards, they got ridicule. The Always Sunny in Philadelphia conspiracy guy meme fit the bill wonderfully.
Anytime you ask libtards for evidence, all they have are names and insults. When you press them, they come with even more insults.
When you ask for proof, you get screaming and spoiled child behavior.
You get nothing but a repeat of indoctrinated main stream media spew.
These are dumb, narcissistic people that were manipulated by the machine.
Pride is at the root of their issue.