I think these types of arguments would be better suited to broader statistics. Bringing up hyper specific cases might make a good soundbite, but how could anyone, good or evil, be familiar these specific cases? So it's easy to dismiss for the average Joe. If you're grilling someone in charge of hundreds of thousands or even millions of cases how could you possibly think they will intimately know the details of single cases?
I think bringing up facts like the 300k+ children that are missing would work better. Bring up facts and details that any reasonable person would think that someone in charge should know. The sheer scale of malfeasance is astronomical, so put fourth those arguments.
Don't get me wrong, I think this guy is lying through his teeth, but I just think it's a bad argument if your goal is to bring more people to our side. I think there is just so much more damning information that could be presented that any sane person couldn't just explain away.. (and maybe that happened, this is just clip after all)
This guys testimony is highly questionable to the point I am manning the lifer boat the DS BS is that deep. The value on specifics are it informs the public legally on what is occurring that would otherwise be missed.
Its just one example of widespread systemic abuse. I think the first jump in logic a normie would take is how often did this happen. And in a typically American sarcastic and cynical fashion they would conclude 'all the friggin time'.
Because he’s an evil Marxist bureaucrat
Crimes against Children. No Statute of Limitations.
I think these types of arguments would be better suited to broader statistics. Bringing up hyper specific cases might make a good soundbite, but how could anyone, good or evil, be familiar these specific cases? So it's easy to dismiss for the average Joe. If you're grilling someone in charge of hundreds of thousands or even millions of cases how could you possibly think they will intimately know the details of single cases?
I think bringing up facts like the 300k+ children that are missing would work better. Bring up facts and details that any reasonable person would think that someone in charge should know. The sheer scale of malfeasance is astronomical, so put fourth those arguments.
Don't get me wrong, I think this guy is lying through his teeth, but I just think it's a bad argument if your goal is to bring more people to our side. I think there is just so much more damning information that could be presented that any sane person couldn't just explain away.. (and maybe that happened, this is just clip after all)
Facts mean nothing to commies,they need cases like this to see the evil.
Lefties never see evil. The perceive the world in strictly black-and-white terms: Oppressors and The Oppressed.
This guys testimony is highly questionable to the point I am manning the lifer boat the DS BS is that deep. The value on specifics are it informs the public legally on what is occurring that would otherwise be missed.
Was thing the same when I read the tweet, was it only one isolated case?
Its just one example of widespread systemic abuse. I think the first jump in logic a normie would take is how often did this happen. And in a typically American sarcastic and cynical fashion they would conclude 'all the friggin time'.
ANOTHER typical kalifornia democRAT.
The reason we need elections and not DS selections.
It is not a "failure of oversight". It is a crime against children. These people know what they are doing and need to see justice.
Amen, I totally agree with you. Time to shut it down and bring them before trials for their Crimes against Humanity.
Save the Children!