Pam Bondi no friend to 2A
(bearingarms.com)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
We are not going to get everything from everyone.
AGs don't draft laws. They only execute them. Her stance in laws don't matter.
She has a narrow job focus: get rid of shit prosecutors in government, a task she will happily and ably take.
I understand what you are saying - similar to RFK Jr having no voice WRT oil. I hadn’t seen this discussed here, and thought it was worth bringing up.
Eyes open. I evaluate similar to how I evaluate Elon.
I don’t trust Elon because I think he’s bought and paid for. Does he do some things I like? Yes. Do I trust him? No.
Same. Super sus of Elon myself
I'm super sus of EVERYONE, including Trump. I have definite hopes and think he's a good guy, but no one gets a pass.
We watch actions. We are for 1 thing. The Constitution and the Republic. If there's any sketch shit, even by Trump, we must hold their feet to the fire no matter what.
Yeah. I’m sorta waiting for the double cross… but I’ll take the wins in the short-term
agreed.
Also these people are working under Trump. They are not elected. He can fire them any time he wants.
Its like Trump picking RFK jr for HHS - I wouldn't want him touching 2A either but he's the right person for the job Trump has put him in. Sam case here in my opinion thus far.
Not only has Trump identified the traitors in Congress with his nominations, he has shined a light on the shills of this board.
You appear to be calling me a shill. Why? I think this deserves highlighting
Right.
It’s a moot point. She doesn’t make laws. She isn’t against the 2nd amendment. You may disagree with her on a law that is related to the 2nd amendment but she in now way wants to repeal the 2nd amendment.
I agree with you on these points and disagree with Bondi. I wouldn’t vote for her as a lawmaker. She is what Trump needs at the moment and I am not wanting to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
And I don’t believe most of these posts attacking her are genuine.
Mostly I agree with what you said- not everyone is perfect. However, this deserves to be noted.
And I understand that. Some of these appointments are going to work out and some not. It is just the volume of negative posts, by “Trump supporters”, on his nominations that get on my head. It seems like some sort of brigading by the bad guys. I just snapped on you.
I think we all want all the good things to start happening immediately, but it’ll take time. For instance- can’t our F’d up food supply be fixed tomorrow?
So, no sweat.
Welcome to America. Trump didn't elect himself. America hired him to do a job. The Founding Fathers debated often in building this nation. We all need to be diligent about people we pay to protect and defend our Constitution. Greatness and Excellence are achieved through conflict. We are a nation of leaders not followers.
Making valid points is not shilling. She may not make laws but she has great influence in the Making of laws. Settling for crumbs always bite you in the behind in the long run.
You need to list alternatives that have a chance at getting confirmed.
I think she is far from crumbs. More like highly desirable for this job with a couple of flaws.
I am more concerned that she could be a plant that could turn on Trump once she is in control. Not any of the nitpicky things she will have no power over whatsoever.
I do agree that discussing her issues is fair game. Again it is the volume and tone of the attacks that wear me out. They do protest too much, and I am just as sensitive of shills infiltrateing this forum as swamp creatures infiltrating Trump’s inner circle.
She's crumbs compared to Sydney Powell to name one. I am sure there are others. Someone posting a conflict in a thoughtful, serious manner based on evidence is a thinking person not a shill. Shills don't last long here. Shills name call when you disagree with them. We are into TRUTH FIRST. That's what lead American Excellence.
I do like Sydney. And agree with everything you say.
I appreciate you wannabe. Trump has a way of proving me wrong most times. I love that about him. Your point of view is important as well. We all need to keep eyes open.
Here comes the "sow doubt in Trump" horse shit just as predicted. Sorry, go peddle this shit elsewhere, Trust in Trump and the plan is rock solid.
Nope. I’m allowed to bring things up of concern here. If you don’t like it, go find an echo chamber that meets your needs.
LOL!!! You can bring it up, and I'm allowed to point out your stupidity and arrogance. Maybe go over to Reddit, you might feel more at home.
Bah. I make no argument that I’ve got moments of stupidity, maybe more than I would like. Arrogant? No, wrong person.
Every single person who could or should be nominated for any govt position comes with some sort of baggage, so it all depends on the answers she gives at her confirmation hearing, and, later on, how she performs as USAG if she's confirmed. And, in the event she performs poorly, I'm positive PDJT fires her ass. If we shot down every single nominee over singular issues, we'd have no government at all. And while that may seem preferable, it puts us squarely in an anarchical society, and that we simply cannot have.
So, imo, let's lay off the singular issue tactics and give the woman a chance. She did great as FL's AG and she has PDJT's support. She's one of the reasons he decided to move to FL and make it his home State, so if she's good enough for his support, she's most certainly likely to be good for the rest of the nation, too.
I agree with everything you’ve said. I haven’t seen this topic here yet and thought it went mentioning because we should be informed as to each nominee’s pro/con points.
I’ll admit, I check the hot sheets regularly… but I didn’t search to check first to see if this particular thing had been mentioned.
I’m very shocked at the push back I have received over this. Very surprising. Seems to me that everyone just wants to talk about the points we like and then ignore everything else that doesn’t fit their preferred narrative.
What have we turned into?
Would you guys friggen stop. She was offered attorney general she has nothing to do with gun laws.
You guys just keep going on about nothing either you are a democrat or your brain dead.
I think there is an issue here. I’m not sure why you are resorting to name calling?
Hey, We’re all entitled to our opinions here, no? Bondi isn’t squeaky clean and neither is Oz and a few other admin picks. I’m done with blind party loyalty myself so let the chips fall where the truth lies.
Oh yeah, Oz…. Uuuggghhhh…..
That's right.