I watched Stew Peters once only. He gave me a bad feeling. Call it intuition but I never watched him again. And hearing that he was putting forth the stupid snake venom theory only reinforced my feelings.
I haven't figured out why certain "patriots" go full trigger mode with the "stupid snake venom theory". If you actually listen to some of the details given by let's say Dr. Ardis or some of the others that talk on the subject, who i think speaks some actual important information but still a poser. The documents and research behind the venom theories it becomes clear it's not so stupid at all. Much of it is verifiable through patents and medical licenses s,, descriptions and required labels. Shooting the presenter over the information is salacious elementary logic. Even a dumb ass, redcoat, fence sitter, can speak truth. It's call critical thinking and discernment.
I don't disagree because with the experimental injections bio pharma were putting all sorts of foreign substances in them for testing purposes to test with a large scale population versus a smaller control group.
That topic was also discuss in fair length about the history behind the symbol and what's represented. I forget which cast or who was on it but they also had some compelling history points brought up on that as well.
I'd have to go digging. It was roughly 2 years ago when that was going around. And interestingly it's way harder, one might say suppressed, in any searches. Have to use exact terms on any browser, search engine combo I've tried not too long ago.
Edit: Found a rumble (wont give me hyperlink option here) video:
This one has some interesting info. Dont get me wrong here, the "presenters" like jane ruby, I'm not putting much stock into them. I searched quite a bit of info provided in this cast and was able to at least verify it was verifiable to some extent leading me to a conclusion that this info is potentially credible and probable.
I just wonder, if there was something to it why did no one pick up the story? Where are the anons still carrying that torch, posting relevant sauce? Correct me if I'm wrong, Ardis' claim was that they were putting synthetic snake venom in the tap water, which is what caused covid?
I was just thinking about this earlier. It is a scientific fact (with a capital S) that "they" have designed synthetic snake venom, and that many Big Pharma medications contain them, including some taken by people on this forum no doubt. It only requires a little legwork to find out every single component of your meds and what the names of ingredients actually are. You think they list 'viper venom' on a med ingredient list? Of course not. They use the synthetic version's name. Many researchers got suspicious of how the covid vax causes after-effects resembling what snake bite victims experience, such as loss of smell and taste. It really is not that hard to comprehend. If information with research to back it up, is rejected because the person talking about it is an asshole, it is petulance, not reason.
The issue of synthetic venom in a Big Pharma products just is not something the masses are going to accept easily, but the truth is definitely out there.
O.T: I am taking this opportunity to say that I no longer have any doubts about AJ's true intentions. He is for life and freedom, not death cults and slavery. People have to be allowed to evolve. It is like the story about the bucket full of crabs on a dock, and one succeeds in climbing to the rim, but the rest of the crabs have a grip on him and back down he goes. Human nature is like that. Not our best trait.
Yeah I agree. That's why I try to respond to the posts I've seen that immediately and ignorantly attack anything to do with snake venom theories in ad hominem or in general. It's an actual important subject. Something that's become quite rare on this site anymore.
I watched Stew Peters once only. He gave me a bad feeling. Call it intuition but I never watched him again. And hearing that he was putting forth the stupid snake venom theory only reinforced my feelings.
I haven't figured out why certain "patriots" go full trigger mode with the "stupid snake venom theory". If you actually listen to some of the details given by let's say Dr. Ardis or some of the others that talk on the subject, who i think speaks some actual important information but still a poser. The documents and research behind the venom theories it becomes clear it's not so stupid at all. Much of it is verifiable through patents and medical licenses s,, descriptions and required labels. Shooting the presenter over the information is salacious elementary logic. Even a dumb ass, redcoat, fence sitter, can speak truth. It's call critical thinking and discernment.
I don't disagree because with the experimental injections bio pharma were putting all sorts of foreign substances in them for testing purposes to test with a large scale population versus a smaller control group.
I certainly wouldn't reflexively rule it out. Remind me again what is wrapping around the staff of the AMA symbol?
That topic was also discuss in fair length about the history behind the symbol and what's represented. I forget which cast or who was on it but they also had some compelling history points brought up on that as well.
Can you link details on the snake venom theory? What conclusive findings did Ardis present?
If it was true he would still be warning about it.
I'd have to go digging. It was roughly 2 years ago when that was going around. And interestingly it's way harder, one might say suppressed, in any searches. Have to use exact terms on any browser, search engine combo I've tried not too long ago.
Edit: Found a rumble (wont give me hyperlink option here) video:
https://rumble.com/v1wvqlq-dr.-bryan-ardis-i-was-wrong-about-snake-venom-the-dr.-jane-ruby-show.html
This one has some interesting info. Dont get me wrong here, the "presenters" like jane ruby, I'm not putting much stock into them. I searched quite a bit of info provided in this cast and was able to at least verify it was verifiable to some extent leading me to a conclusion that this info is potentially credible and probable.
I just wonder, if there was something to it why did no one pick up the story? Where are the anons still carrying that torch, posting relevant sauce? Correct me if I'm wrong, Ardis' claim was that they were putting synthetic snake venom in the tap water, which is what caused covid?
I was just thinking about this earlier. It is a scientific fact (with a capital S) that "they" have designed synthetic snake venom, and that many Big Pharma medications contain them, including some taken by people on this forum no doubt. It only requires a little legwork to find out every single component of your meds and what the names of ingredients actually are. You think they list 'viper venom' on a med ingredient list? Of course not. They use the synthetic version's name. Many researchers got suspicious of how the covid vax causes after-effects resembling what snake bite victims experience, such as loss of smell and taste. It really is not that hard to comprehend. If information with research to back it up, is rejected because the person talking about it is an asshole, it is petulance, not reason. The issue of synthetic venom in a Big Pharma products just is not something the masses are going to accept easily, but the truth is definitely out there.
O.T: I am taking this opportunity to say that I no longer have any doubts about AJ's true intentions. He is for life and freedom, not death cults and slavery. People have to be allowed to evolve. It is like the story about the bucket full of crabs on a dock, and one succeeds in climbing to the rim, but the rest of the crabs have a grip on him and back down he goes. Human nature is like that. Not our best trait.
Yeah I agree. That's why I try to respond to the posts I've seen that immediately and ignorantly attack anything to do with snake venom theories in ad hominem or in general. It's an actual important subject. Something that's become quite rare on this site anymore.