Not tech I would even touch with a billion foot pole.
That said, and it is a factor, someone is going to do it and I would rather someone that has some amount of morality and integrity be the one to do so.
We have laws for that, which are already ethics and morality based. Experimenting like this on prison inmates violates every legal, moral, and ethical code known to mankind. Which is why it's banned under the Geneva Convention's POW section.
I believe what you are looking for is the “Declaration of Helsinki”, covering informed consent in medical trials. Criminal prisoners are not covered by the Geneva Convention.
Better to have laws clearly stating proper use and ethics and punishments.
Ever see the anime series Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex? It deals a lot with the ethics of medical, gov't, and social organizations as related to bio/cyber implants and bodily autonomy. It goes over the concept of technological restraint that is so often lacking in the technology industry and our government and culture.
Just because you have the technological impetus to do something does not grant you the moral right to do so. Just because it can be easily done by reprobates doesn't mean you say 'OK it's fine', because you can't easily regulate it.
Literally everything is a product of human experiments, at least performing it on voluntary people who know the risks is better than the old Soviet and Nazi way of performing it on people who they disappeared from their homes late at night.
Just ties in with the cabal's vision for humanity. Constant change, technological advancement, no stopping "progress." They were writing about some pretty grisly outcomes on the monkey experiments while Musk was still the darling of the mainstream media. Also eventually that technology could get hacked and turn everyone into slaves. The negative possibilities far outweigh the good ones; like colonizing Mars and lithium batteries.
Which is why, as grateful as I am to Elon Musk for all he's done for us, I do not trust Neuralink in the slightest.
Cool sci fi tech.
Not tech I would even touch with a billion foot pole.
That said, and it is a factor, someone is going to do it and I would rather someone that has some amount of morality and integrity be the one to do so.
We have laws for that, which are already ethics and morality based. Experimenting like this on prison inmates violates every legal, moral, and ethical code known to mankind. Which is why it's banned under the Geneva Convention's POW section.
IBM and Pelican Bay should both be shutdown and anyone involved should be procesuted and put in prison. At the very least...
I believe what you are looking for is the “Declaration of Helsinki”, covering informed consent in medical trials. Criminal prisoners are not covered by the Geneva Convention.
Which has nothing to do with voluntarily submitting yourself to it like Neuralink.
Besides, we already funded bio weapons use. Governments don't care.
Then, as soon as they're dead, the wicked, evil toad that wants world domination swoops in and takes over, and we're all fucked.
Its far better the technology never exists.
Look at insulin! Guy who discovered it sold the patent for $1 to a university bc he felt it was unethical to profit from a lifesaving drug.
Now look at insulin prices. Dudes trust was very misplaced, many years after his death
Can't put the genie back in the bottle.
Better to have laws clearly stating proper use and ethics and punishments.
Ever see the anime series Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex? It deals a lot with the ethics of medical, gov't, and social organizations as related to bio/cyber implants and bodily autonomy. It goes over the concept of technological restraint that is so often lacking in the technology industry and our government and culture.
Just because you have the technological impetus to do something does not grant you the moral right to do so. Just because it can be easily done by reprobates doesn't mean you say 'OK it's fine', because you can't easily regulate it.
Would a moral person go through with the human experiments given the implications on the subjects?
Literally everything is a product of human experiments, at least performing it on voluntary people who know the risks is better than the old Soviet and Nazi way of performing it on people who they disappeared from their homes late at night.
Just ties in with the cabal's vision for humanity. Constant change, technological advancement, no stopping "progress." They were writing about some pretty grisly outcomes on the monkey experiments while Musk was still the darling of the mainstream media. Also eventually that technology could get hacked and turn everyone into slaves. The negative possibilities far outweigh the good ones; like colonizing Mars and lithium batteries.