This is some bullshit. Can Trump sign an EO to squash?
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Question: are "pardons" and/or "immunity" even valid if we're at war and under military control?
What about him being a fake president?
Heck, there isn't even strong evidence that he's alive.
Maybe the "pardons and "immunity" are being used by WHs to spotlight DS crimes for the normies.
That’s an interesting concept, can the president pardon a corporation or does that only apply to individuals?
Fraud vitiates everything!
Someone make a t-shirt
Immunity doesn't work. Not when there are deaths attributed.
Any lawyer knows this, and a class action would shatter it.
It's up to us.
That immunity is about as useful as used toilet paper. There is no way it would stand up in the courts. Presidents have a lot of power but they aren't gods or emperors.
GEOTUS is, by definition.
I wonder how much money he got for that. SOB
"Knowingly"
None of Biden's pardons will matter, because he was not legitimately elected.
Check all his bank accounts. Especially, the secret ones.
Any action unilaterally taken by a president can be undone by another president.
RFK can gut this with the stroke of a pen.
Presidents are not dictators.
A president can't "unpardon" another president's pardon. They can undo all of the EOs - and they always do.
Pardons are the only single exception to my statement.
Congrats, you found the only one exception to that statement.
And, that proves, what?
Guess you missed me agreeing with that?
Look. There has been so much wrong crap on here lately regarding pardons. It really is simple though - the Constitution outlines that only Federal Crimes - EVERYTHING but impeachment - can be pardoned by a president. Nothing (except the ire of the voters) limits treason or pedophilia or any of the other recent things that have popped up here. They can't pardon state crimes.
I could see your statement leading to a whole new round of "POTUS can just pardon XYZ" and I clarified the pardon part. I agreed with the second part. If you can't handle clarification that was intended to help people understand a topic that is clearly confusing to some, I'm sorry but that's on you. Not everything is a personal attack.
By the way - here is another example of why I wanted to clarify the pardon stuff. There are still a lot of anons here that don't understand a Presidential pardon yet.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19A0ooFT9c/tina-peters-exclusive-im-letting/c/
Maybe he can pardon them, I don't think so, but even so it does not cover future incidents/crimes. They would have to stop manufacturing and injecting that poison immediately.
They already had indemnity (Indemnity is important - Bill Gates)
They need more protection then indemnity and secret courts?
I heard those who got the jab had to sign something that say they cannot sue. I don’t understand why people went along with it