Ah, so that's why Greenland!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (79)
sorted by:
It's for the Rare Earth Minerals.
That is much more likely the reason than some dumbass attempt to manipulate temperature averages.
Folks should remember, Trump doesn't buy the climate change hoax. He even told them when they kept probing, "it'll get colder". A lot of the climate BS will end when the EPA is canned, and I believe Trump will can the EPA pretty quickly once he takes office again. They were just put in place to destroy the nation's energy sector, and throttle the production of food in country.
The actual climatologists say the earth will begin a cooling cycle in 2030. This is largely why the UN and the globalists had 2030 marked as when they needed all their plans completed by. Once the climate starts to drop in temperature the world will know they were lied to but it would have been too late...
I saw a post this morning on X whining about how all the 'scientists' are afraid what Trump is going to do to science.
Those whiners are the paid liars of the cabal, and they should be worried. Trump will push the real science and real scientists.
From an engineering standpoint, the amount of extra heat generated from making everything "green" goes against all engineering principles when you look at the overall effect. Locomotives for example have to work harder and at higher temperatures, this inherently often causing more warming. Some have been know to help set brush on fire when it is too close to the tracks.
I hear Greenland has some underground nuclear facility
You are probably referring to Camp Century, an under-ice Army facility that was powered by a portable nuclear reactor (mainly as a proof-of-principle to show that it could be done). The facility was abandoned and the reactor removed decades ago. Denmark hadn't been consulted and was understandably miffed.
We have Tule AFB there
I just learned that they are called rare earth elements, or REEs
I did some research and learned that Greenland actually has some successful mining operations underway, typically in the parts that are not under 2000 to 3,000 m of ice, so that's only 20% of Greenland, typically in the coastal areas. The big yield? Ruby's, interestingly enough.
Something I just connected though that makes sense is that Trump is making moves against China with his Panama canal comments, talking about how control over the canal must stay with Panama instead of being given to China. China is also reportedly sniffing around Greenland as well looking for mining opportunities so there is that.
Every government has bad guys
Those mines are huge, ugly scars on the earth. I'm not against progress, but look at what happened in North Carolina. A huge mine worth billions, right where that whole town was wiped off the map, and why the government refused to go in.
I believe Greenland has a very small population and most of it is uninhabitable. Perhaps it will be a wonderful place to extract rare Earth materials.
We need semiconductors and China is refusing to play ball. Greenland is a good source for these minerals that China isn't letting us have. If we want to be able to be self reliant we need to be able to make our own chips.
He didn't say it was for resources though. I'm paraphrasing, but he said it was needed for national defense and protecting freedom. It has to be more than just a few minerals or economic policies. There has to be something strategic about it.
Computer chips are vital to national defense.
I think having an unencumbered supply of Rare Earth Elements needed for computers, batteries, etc does fall in the category of national defense.
It's already strategic and we've used it to fly over the north pole into Russia 🇷🇺