Is this their plan?
(thehill.com)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Can someone please summarize so I don't have to give them a click?
Here ya go fren. AI Generated summary:
Title: Congress does not have to accept Trump's electoral votes
The article argues that Congress has the constitutional authority to block Donald Trump from taking office due to his alleged engagement in insurrection, as outlined in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. This section disqualifies anyone who has previously taken an oath to support the Constitution and later engages in insurrection or rebellion. The authors cite Trump's second impeachment trial and a Colorado court ruling affirming that he engaged in insurrection as evidence supporting this claim. Additionally, they highlight the findings of the House Select Committee on the January 6th Capitol attack, which included testimonies from numerous witnesses, many of whom were Republicans.
The article contends that despite a Supreme Court ruling suggesting that federal legislation is needed to enforce Section 3, Congress retains the unique power to reject electoral votes based on constitutional grounds. The authors argue that this rejection does not require Supreme Court approval, as it is a non-reviewable political question. They reference the Electoral Count Act, which outlines the process for resolving disputes regarding Electoral College votes, indicating that a vote for a disqualified candidate is not regularly given.
The authors urge Democrats to take a stand against counting Electoral College votes for Trump unless his disqualification is removed, emphasizing that this is necessary to uphold their oath to defend the Constitution.
Thank you for that. So I guess the article makes no mention of the fact that Trump was never charged with insurrection.
Of course not. They simply disregard reality if it doesn't serve their agenda.
these opinion writers are dumb asses that dont know shit........
Is The Hill a leftish shill rag?
I think it is, yeah, and I think that if they try it, Trump will play his Trump card, which I think is the Brunson case ruling from the Supreme Court. Wrote a post on it the other day:
https://greatawakening.win/p/19A0yCgyM2/theory-on-the-trump-card--jan
I just wish that there was a Charles Brunson brother... he'd play a mean trumpet
Unless I'm mistaken, no one from J6 has been charged much less convicted of insurrection.
January 6th, 2021 was an FBI operation with help from Nancy Pelosi. Both are guilty along with over 500 members of congress.
Trump was President at this time.
Was the insurrection against himself?