I'm very confused about Flynn too. It seems when Trump speaks of him, it conveys a ton of confidence. But then he'll go for so long without any mention at all. Almost to the point of excluding him when it feels like he should be included.
Flynn just hosted a benefit (dec 10) at Mar-a-Lago with DJT in attendance, headlined by a variety of patriots, etc.
"Can be taken in more than one way" is an easy statement pointing to the obvious potential ambiguity in any isolated sentence, which THEN requires the addition of other information, context, etc, to refine and zone ion on the meaning.
Given other factors outside of the three words themselves, "be ready to be arrested" makes zero sense.
If one is sincere in his or her interest for truth, some effort is required. Using an isolated statement devoid of the context and information it is used in - this is not research or any form of due diligence. It's seeking out isolated factoids to uphold "my own prejudices and biases". It's argument for rhetorical win, not an endeavor to dig and find the truth.
I wanna say it was a Trump rally during the summer...(maybe before butler #1] ...where Trump callled out General Flynn and said "be ready, general".
He definitely has a role...just may be out of sight until things come into focus and he can take the stage at that juncture.
I remember this also
I'm very confused about Flynn too. It seems when Trump speaks of him, it conveys a ton of confidence. But then he'll go for so long without any mention at all. Almost to the point of excluding him when it feels like he should be included.
That’s the whole point. If you are confused just imagine how confused our enemies are.
Fog of war!
I'm not a fan of Flynn.
That can be taken in more than one way.
Very true, lol. Be ready to be arrested fits also lol
kek. Sorry. Frankly, that's just plain dumb.
Look at the context: when, where Trump said this.
What kind of expression did he have, did he use?
Flynn just hosted a benefit (dec 10) at Mar-a-Lago with DJT in attendance, headlined by a variety of patriots, etc.
"Can be taken in more than one way" is an easy statement pointing to the obvious potential ambiguity in any isolated sentence, which THEN requires the addition of other information, context, etc, to refine and zone ion on the meaning.
Given other factors outside of the three words themselves, "be ready to be arrested" makes zero sense.
If one is sincere in his or her interest for truth, some effort is required. Using an isolated statement devoid of the context and information it is used in - this is not research or any form of due diligence. It's seeking out isolated factoids to uphold "my own prejudices and biases". It's argument for rhetorical win, not an endeavor to dig and find the truth.
In my non-WEF opinion.
Exactly.
Not so much a role as a target and a use....