West Yorkshire police,
Charles and Diana,
Peter Sutcliffe (the Yorkshire ripper),
Margeret thatcher,
The Beatles,
Esther rantzen ( UK TV personality 70s80s) who also wanted different rules for the unjabbed..
He was the British Epstein/Hefner honey pot controller... And got away with it like Hefner!
If that's the same house I saw, it was already wrecked on the inside. Local kids smashed every window, and anything inside had been ransacked, with holes in the walls and stuff. If it's another property previously unknown, it's concerning.
Destroying evidence. Forensic arsonist inspection should prove it was deliberate. They should be liable for destroying evidence if it can be proved it was arson.
Totally not suspicious.
It’s just like Epstein island on fire in 2018
More here. https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/showbiz-tv/jimmy-saviles-former-house-horrors-30965891
100% updoogle for the solid Subject Line, quoting Sauce "Shadow of Ezra: " and then Headline.
Thank you anon. This is the way is should always be done.
For more digs on Savile, see Ultra Pepe Lives Matter's
"The Ultimate Jimmy Savile Thread" on X
https://x.com/Ultrafrog17/status/1729554243382575541?s=20
on on the Thread reader app (web)
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1729554243382575541.html
Why buried at 45-degrees? So the worms could slide in easier? 😂😂
That looks like a 33 degree angle to me
Would loved to have busted that guy up back in the day.
How convenient
Can we dig him up and kill him again?
He was very friendly with...
West Yorkshire police, Charles and Diana, Peter Sutcliffe (the Yorkshire ripper), Margeret thatcher, The Beatles, Esther rantzen ( UK TV personality 70s80s) who also wanted different rules for the unjabbed.. He was the British Epstein/Hefner honey pot controller... And got away with it like Hefner!
CYA
That was only a quick view of the fire going past, but it didn't look like they were doing much to put out the fire. Perhaps they had just arrived.
Getting rid of evidence!!!
C'est un bon feu
How conveeeenient...
I’m shocked it took this long for the evidence to be destroyed.
If that's the same house I saw, it was already wrecked on the inside. Local kids smashed every window, and anything inside had been ransacked, with holes in the walls and stuff. If it's another property previously unknown, it's concerning.
Destroying evidence. Forensic arsonist inspection should prove it was deliberate. They should be liable for destroying evidence if it can be proved it was arson.