Becoming Brigitte: Candace Owens x Xavier Poussard
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (71)
sorted by:
Here is the full version.
https://candaceowens.com/video/becoming-brigitte-candace-owens-x-xavier-poussard-ep-6/
Here is the conclusion: The French president "Emmanuel Macron" is married to Brigitte Macron, who has turned out to be a trans woman, who has also turned out to be Emmanuel's OWN BIOLOGICAL FATHER
Yes, and she put it up for all to see. It's NOT behind a paywall. God bless her!
How is it not blowing up on X that Emmanuel Macron is married to HIS FATHER?!!!
Because it isn’t true and the videos don’t say that
Some people are drawing that conclusion for sure. I've not been able to get the full video to play on my computer. But my Mom watched it today and said that she does NOT explicitly say that Brigitte is the father. This is one of those mysteries easily solved with a DNA test, so it will be interesting to see what happens.
It has not been conclusively proven yet on that.
You mean, its not behind HER paywall. but for $16,99 a month you can get 'unfiltered truth' from her. Actually, "starting at $16.99". So it looks like there is exclusive exclusive content, you can get for a higher monthly premium. Wow. Ain't that grand? Or, if you cannot afford that much, you can join her book club for $6.99 a month.
Owens is very strongly positioning herself as a truth teller, "unfiltered" but her website shows she's pretty much a multi-million dollar business. Hmmmm...
Do you think there's no cost to what she does? Do you think she should work hard, employ people, pay them, make content (LOTS of which is available freely on YouTube), but she shouldn't make a living from what she does? Or maybe you think she or her husband should work full time to support their family and then do this truth telling on the side for free? (As if that would even be possible in terms of time.) And then we wonder why journalism, music, literature, television, etc, are in the state they are--because people can't make a living doing those things even if they love them without selling their souls to some machine to make them viable.
If you want to do all of that, great! Create a website, curate it, fill it with compelling content, and send me the link. I'll be happy to watch it.
Thanks Chuck.
No.
No.
Or maybe you think she or her husband should work full time to support their family and then do this truth telling on the side for free?
No.
BUT, I am exceedingly skeptical of individuals who seem to be much more focused on building a business brand WHILE touting themselves as "unfiltered truth tellers".
I support content creators who should be paid for the hard work they do. This does not mean that ANYONE who makes money while telling everyone they are 'unfiltered truth tellers' is automatically honestly motivated.
She should make money. She can make money. But the great awakening, she is not.
Since the dawn of Q, 'telling truth' has become a big business. Plus, there are many, many operations deployed by the bad actors to infiltrate the 'truth sphere', and work controlled opposition and gate keeping.
I used to be ignorant of this concept. But I am no longer.
So, there is a big difference between making a living, even making a decent living, and making "I'm telling you unfiltered truth" into a big glossy business, especially when it is NOT 'unfiltered'.
There are bona fide Awakening operations out there that make a living off the support they get, but who do not restrict access to "truth". I contrast them with what Owens is doing. In addition, I look this particular issue in conjunction with other aspects I consider to be red flags with Owens.
It's OK to be skeptical. It's NOT ok to just give someone a pass just because they tout themselves as truth telling.
A final note, Chuck. The reason why artists cannot make a living in these areas without "selling their souls" to the machine is because the machine infiltrated and took over and corrupted these areas to the power-concentrating and tyrannical ends.
This is changing. Firstly, with the discrediting and destruction of "entertainment" and the corporate mainstream media complex, and secondly, with the freedom that the internet has fostered starting in the last few decades, more and more content creators are able to establish themselves, create a niche, and work independently.
A question: Do you think that the bad actors, black hats and cabal are OK with this trend? What do you think they might do in order to try to derail this trend, or limit the loss of their control over the information sphere?
That's what we need to ask ourselves at this juncture in the information war. We're at war. Make no mistake.
I don't believe anyone came to the conclusion that Jean Michel (aka Brigitte) is actually Emmanuel's biological father, at least not in this episode you link to (thank you for this as I'd been following CO's series, but hadn't yet seen this episode). Where do you get the idea to take that claim as fact? At 43:56 they show a comparison between Jean Michel's son and Emmanuel and, while there are similarities, there are definitely differences, too.
Perhaps to some. When I block out that middle picture, to my eyes, the differences become even more pronounced. I don't see them as looking like siblings, but I suppose some could. Cousins perhaps? Who knows, but to me, knowing the background, it's maybe more likely that JM/B prefers a "type".
Since they (if I'm understanding the story correctly) confirmed that the guy on the left is actually JM/B's biological son and we know that JM went off the deep end and "became" B (aka adopted homosexuality and a transsexual and/or transvestite persona and changed his name to B) it brings to mind more disturbing thoughts as to what the biological son may have had to endure in his youth at the hands of his biological father JM. Don't even want to think about that.
But do these people even have control of their own lives? Are they making these choices willingly or are they blackmailed, coerced/threatened and controlled? God knows; I'm not even sure I want to know at this point. In any case, this brings up a perfect segue into exposing Big Mike to the brainwashed masses. There are people I know who I'm curious to see what their reactions are to that. It's going to be interesting seeing how the French react to the Mr & Mr Macron reality.
I have not seen enough to come to a conclusion yet. It would be such a serious allegation of abuse if true.
Anon, you literally wrote the following --
" Here is the full version.
https://candaceowens.com/video/becoming-brigitte-candace-owens-x-xavier-poussard-ep-6/
Here is the conclusion: The French president "Emmanuel Macron" is married to Brigitte Macron, who has turned out to be a trans woman, who has also turned out to be Emmanuel's OWN BIOLOGICAL FATHER"
.
I'll assume this is your retraction after considering it further.
I am not going to retract that yet because it's still a possibility that Brigite might be Macron's biological father. Cannot confirm nor denied it yet.
Where do you see that this is Emmanuel’s own father? From what I saw it’s a separate family?
There was the picture of Macron looking like the son of Brigite. I think it was shown 2x. One of Brigite's son got the same facial structure (but a little bit more thin) than Macron.
Wondering if there's some other episode coming out later.
Not saying that it's conclusively proven yet because I have not heard they use the software on that yet.
Hm ok possible! But I don’t think the reporter or anyone gathering the evidence has presented that yet. But good to know
I've been attempting to track down a copy of the letter(s) that Owens has told everyone the Macrons lawyers sent to her.
She made a big deal about this so-called letter, and stated that she would make it public,
"Today, I will of course make that letter public."
But I cannot find it so far.
What I did find is that Owen's website has a lot of $$$$ focus, from selling her book to having clubs you can join for bucks, "exclusive" member content, merch, skin care products, etc.
"The truth unfiltered" Except its filtered unless you fork over USD 16.99 a month.
Full disclosure, I hold the opinion that Candace Owens is a controlled opposition gatekeeper operation. Drafting on to others, like Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, etc, she is positioning herself as "unfiltered truth" where as in fact, there is no such thing, especially not if you are a multi-million dollar operation 'proving truth'.