Jscholl17 almost dies laughing at the news that the flight crew involved in the crash in Toronto was experienced.
Seriously though, it is quite possible that the wind caused the plane to flip and the crew was unprepared for that. The proper response would have been to assess the weather conditions at the destination and make the call to either takeoff or delay the flight until conditions improve.
They were already too far down the runway to make a good landing and instead of inititating a go around they planted it hard on the runway without flaring.
Didn't another plane crash on landing due to landing gear failure ... I want to say it was that plane associated with Vince Neil of shitband Motley Crue.
All of this looks like sabotage. Planes don't crash this frequently.
A severe surface level cross wind will cause a plane to cat walk, or crab walk, and can also cause a drip in air pressure, causing the plane to suddenly drop in altitude or bounce once the gears make contact with the runway, especially if the pilot doesn't have positive rudder and throttle control to minimize the cat walk and descent rate.
I've seen highly experienced Naval Aviators with THOUSANDS of flight hours and thousands of Carriers traps/landings under their belts make hard AF landings due to cross wind and pressure differentials within the cross wind boundaries.
I've also been in some fairly hard landings in airliners and military transport planes where the aircraft basically landed at 60°+ angles relative to the ground and basically power drift the plane back to a straight orientation.
Add an iced over runway and a crew with maybe 1000 hrs total between the pilots and you get what happened in Toronto.
Actually I think the runway was "wet" due to snow on the ground. But that alone shouldn't cause a plane to tip over. It is like the pilot trained herself to hit a certain spot on the runway and that caused the tip.
A hard landing and ripping off a wing shouldn't cause a plane to do a 180. The wind, at least with help from the turbulence, caused the flip. In normal conditions, a hard landing like that should just equal massive damage to the belly. It is also possible (just thought of this now, BTW) that the pilot incorrectly moved the plane, in the cockpit, and helped to cause the flip. In this situation, the pilot shouldn't do anything except brace for impact.
If they were experienced, they would not have had an unstabilized approach with a 1,000 fpm decent rate with no flare to arrest such. CEO is full of shit.
Experienced at what? Making DEI videos?
Was gonna say the same thing! They're experienced at "championing women's rights" by denigrating men, too.
BINGO
washing dishes and making sandwiches🤣😂
Experienced trail hikers ....
Uh oh.
https://archive.ph/wip/dNzES
...archived link, please allow a moment to load...
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-fYQvhB_0Oo
"https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-fYQvhB_0Oo"
...howls...
... how many people will be taking a different flight now?
define "experienced"
You're asking someone who can't even define what a woman is
kek
Finding the ground every time they need to.
“Experienced” in terms of what, exactly? Can they carry a cargo plane full of rubber dog shit out of Hong Kong?
Jscholl17 almost dies laughing at the news that the flight crew involved in the crash in Toronto was experienced.
Seriously though, it is quite possible that the wind caused the plane to flip and the crew was unprepared for that. The proper response would have been to assess the weather conditions at the destination and make the call to either takeoff or delay the flight until conditions improve.
It looked to me that they came down too hard on the landing gear.
They were already too far down the runway to make a good landing and instead of inititating a go around they planted it hard on the runway without flaring.
Pancaked all the gear, not optimal.
Didn't another plane crash on landing due to landing gear failure ... I want to say it was that plane associated with Vince Neil of shitband Motley Crue.
All of this looks like sabotage. Planes don't crash this frequently.
Both planes involved in that accident, were owned by a Vince. Vince Neil & Vince Vaughn. Don't get on a plane owned by a Vince and flown "Unmanned".
A severe surface level cross wind will cause a plane to cat walk, or crab walk, and can also cause a drip in air pressure, causing the plane to suddenly drop in altitude or bounce once the gears make contact with the runway, especially if the pilot doesn't have positive rudder and throttle control to minimize the cat walk and descent rate.
I've seen highly experienced Naval Aviators with THOUSANDS of flight hours and thousands of Carriers traps/landings under their belts make hard AF landings due to cross wind and pressure differentials within the cross wind boundaries.
I've also been in some fairly hard landings in airliners and military transport planes where the aircraft basically landed at 60°+ angles relative to the ground and basically power drift the plane back to a straight orientation.
Add an iced over runway and a crew with maybe 1000 hrs total between the pilots and you get what happened in Toronto.
The runway was dry.
Actually I think the runway was "wet" due to snow on the ground. But that alone shouldn't cause a plane to tip over. It is like the pilot trained herself to hit a certain spot on the runway and that caused the tip.
No, landing so hard that you destroy the landing gear and rip a wing off does that.
A hard landing and ripping off a wing shouldn't cause a plane to do a 180. The wind, at least with help from the turbulence, caused the flip. In normal conditions, a hard landing like that should just equal massive damage to the belly. It is also possible (just thought of this now, BTW) that the pilot incorrectly moved the plane, in the cockpit, and helped to cause the flip. In this situation, the pilot shouldn't do anything except brace for impact.
No. Having only one wing still creating lift flipped the plane.
Whelp, there you have it!
"Whelp, there you have it!"
...thank you sir...
....may I have another...
...howls...
If they were experienced, they would not have had an unstabilized approach with a 1,000 fpm decent rate with no flare to arrest such. CEO is full of shit.
Then it's even scarier