It puts all them outta work. AI is growing increasingly convincing on its own. With just its prompt generation stuff.
Smaller Studios and indie film makers with small crews supplemented by AI tools. Making everything cheaper. Would be a challenge Hollywood wouldn’t want. Especially given how many of the studios are groaning under their own weight.
Especially since the Smaller Studios and Indie guys wouldn’t be beholden to the same obligations as the Major Studios to SAG-AFTRA. Or the talentless hacks in the writers guild
There’s already people turning out shit working in their spare time that’s better than major studios. I’ve seen quite a few impressive animations and short films. And that’s without all the AI stuff becoming increasingly commonplace.
There’s something to be said for loosing the human element. But it’s all self-inflicted by Hollywood being intolerable cunts no one wants to put up with now. Not to mention having shit-tier writers.
It would be fun to see an AI generated "live action" Snow White that is faithful to the Disney cartoon. It would make the upcoming film look all the more ridiculous.
Films will be different in the future. You will be able to choose your own actors. Want to watch the movie "Jack Reacher" but have Alan Ritchson from the TV series playing the eponymous hero? No problem. Swap the settings.
Watching "Star Trek: Next Generation" but you still want William Shatner to be the Captain of the Enterprise? Enter your preference.
The first example was arguably 2001's "Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within." The problem they faced was the high expense and time required to render the high-fidelity images. But although it is very realistic...it is not real...and that is easily noticed by the viewer. More recent work is convincing, so long as they don't push the human mimicry very hard. Human beings have more individuality. I think there is more to be had in background and setting synthesis, as in 2004's "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow," by Kerry Conran. For whatever reason, it didn't light a fire, which I think is a shame. (A lot of recent work relies on "motion capture" from an actual actor. The usual example is Andy Serkis playing Gollum in the "Lord of the Rings" movies.)
It puts all them outta work. AI is growing increasingly convincing on its own. With just its prompt generation stuff.
Smaller Studios and indie film makers with small crews supplemented by AI tools. Making everything cheaper. Would be a challenge Hollywood wouldn’t want. Especially given how many of the studios are groaning under their own weight.
Especially since the Smaller Studios and Indie guys wouldn’t be beholden to the same obligations as the Major Studios to SAG-AFTRA. Or the talentless hacks in the writers guild
There’s already people turning out shit working in their spare time that’s better than major studios. I’ve seen quite a few impressive animations and short films. And that’s without all the AI stuff becoming increasingly commonplace.
There’s something to be said for loosing the human element. But it’s all self-inflicted by Hollywood being intolerable cunts no one wants to put up with now. Not to mention having shit-tier writers.
It would be fun to see an AI generated "live action" Snow White that is faithful to the Disney cartoon. It would make the upcoming film look all the more ridiculous.
Films will be different in the future. You will be able to choose your own actors. Want to watch the movie "Jack Reacher" but have Alan Ritchson from the TV series playing the eponymous hero? No problem. Swap the settings.
Watching "Star Trek: Next Generation" but you still want William Shatner to be the Captain of the Enterprise? Enter your preference.
You could make every leading cowboy "John Wayne."
They should be more concerned with weakened attention spans.
The first example was arguably 2001's "Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within." The problem they faced was the high expense and time required to render the high-fidelity images. But although it is very realistic...it is not real...and that is easily noticed by the viewer. More recent work is convincing, so long as they don't push the human mimicry very hard. Human beings have more individuality. I think there is more to be had in background and setting synthesis, as in 2004's "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow," by Kerry Conran. For whatever reason, it didn't light a fire, which I think is a shame. (A lot of recent work relies on "motion capture" from an actual actor. The usual example is Andy Serkis playing Gollum in the "Lord of the Rings" movies.)
What difference will it make if they produce A.I. generated junk.