As long as it's not written in stone, there is a reasonable doubt. If there is a reasonable doubt, cognitive dissonance will resolve to "You can go about your business. Move along, move along."
If, on the other hand, there is no reasonable doubt left, then, and only then, will people be forced to do something about it.
The people may not be the same, but the institution (C_A) is still the same. The evidence of it's shadyness is easy to see if a person is motivated to look. What if everyone was given evidence that proves, by their own account, that they killed JFK in conjunction with both MI6 and Mossad? Would everyone be motivated to look at the details of their general fuckery? Would they be motivated to look into their origins? Would people see that the C_A was actually created by the Rockefeller family?
So much is connected to that event. Once you are motivated to connect the dots, the dots paint a very different picture of our world. The JFK stuff is proof of a black swan. You can't unlearn about black swans.
When it goes on the official record that an intelligence agency took out a sitting US President, the next logical step is for said agency to no longer exist. This is why...
I'm not sure if I agree with you that it's that simple. JFK had many enemies for myriad reasons. I think it's reasonable to suspect that this is more complex than simply "The CIA & Lyndon Johnson conspired to murder JFK".
There's a reason that powerful people are still trying to prevent this and consequently, I suspect that there will be some surprises in the data.
Even the partial releases from a few years ago acknowledged that Oswald was a CIA asset. Whether knowingly part of it or a stoolie all along, the agency officially was involved and at this point I think the official story is "well he wasn't working for us ANY MORE and we hid that information for no reason!"
It’s been 62 years. The whole friggin world can easily guess who was behind it. What at this point are they still so desperate to hide
As long as it's not written in stone, there is a reasonable doubt. If there is a reasonable doubt, cognitive dissonance will resolve to "You can go about your business. Move along, move along."
If, on the other hand, there is no reasonable doubt left, then, and only then, will people be forced to do something about it.
The people may not be the same, but the institution (C_A) is still the same. The evidence of it's shadyness is easy to see if a person is motivated to look. What if everyone was given evidence that proves, by their own account, that they killed JFK in conjunction with both MI6 and Mossad? Would everyone be motivated to look at the details of their general fuckery? Would they be motivated to look into their origins? Would people see that the C_A was actually created by the Rockefeller family?
So much is connected to that event. Once you are motivated to connect the dots, the dots paint a very different picture of our world. The JFK stuff is proof of a black swan. You can't unlearn about black swans.
The genie ain’t out yet, but the bottle is open. In the time it takes for disclosure many agendas will be revealed.
We KNOW that there are coups in other countries.
What is it that makes so many people here so hands-over-ears?
When it goes on the official record that an intelligence agency took out a sitting US President, the next logical step is for said agency to no longer exist. This is why...
I'm not sure if I agree with you that it's that simple. JFK had many enemies for myriad reasons. I think it's reasonable to suspect that this is more complex than simply "The CIA & Lyndon Johnson conspired to murder JFK".
There's a reason that powerful people are still trying to prevent this and consequently, I suspect that there will be some surprises in the data.
Even the partial releases from a few years ago acknowledged that Oswald was a CIA asset. Whether knowingly part of it or a stoolie all along, the agency officially was involved and at this point I think the official story is "well he wasn't working for us ANY MORE and we hid that information for no reason!"