It's not looking very good. This isn't the first time Grassley has voted with the democrats. Forget what vote it was, but a month or so ago, he was on another RINO vote list. Pretty sure he was on a few before that.
And with so much "pork" added to most bills (at least until there are single-item bills), the REASON(S) for someone's vote may be JUST as important as their vote.
I've said this before. Q didn't say whether to trust that Grassley is good or trust that he is bad. Trust that he will do the right thing, or trust that he will do the wrong thing. We mostly all think we are supposed to trust that he will be good, but none of us really know if that was disinformation or not. Same with trust Kansas and trust Sessions.
I don't know myself, but I do know if someone is in the govt for as long as Grassley it doesn't usually end up that they were good. I mean - look at the recent examples... Cocaine Mitch, Pelosi, Feinstein, Biden, Waters, and countless more on both sides of the aisle.
IMO, Pompeo and Wray have proved themselves to be untrustworthy. Regarding Sessions, I honestly believe he did more during Trump's first term than we know. I think he was responsible for authoring and filing many of the sealed indictments back then, and set the stage for many of the prosecutions that we will see soon. Remember, Trump45 = FA and Trump47=FO.
Exactly. A better way of saying what I was originally trying to say is "Trust xxxxx to be themselves". I think that is exactly what Q meant when saying "Trust xxxxx". Pompeo (likely "Kansas") will always Pompeo. Sessions always seemed like a greeter at a country auction that will shake your hand and give you a lice of pie.
Agreed! Like I said, the only surprise I found on the list is Grassley. I'm beginning to think his "corn" tweets weren't comms, and were actually about corn.
A simple check of their personal finances and those of their family would be illuminating. A chart of their net worth starting from the beginning of their first term until today might show us where the problem lies.
No surprises except for Grassley.
So is Grassley Cornholio for Cornholing now or what?
u/#popcornbutthead
It's not looking very good. This isn't the first time Grassley has voted with the democrats. Forget what vote it was, but a month or so ago, he was on another RINO vote list. Pretty sure he was on a few before that.
Check their wives and relatives to see if they are heads of NGOs.
Yes my eyebrows raised and I thought "Huh?" When I read it, but I'm sticking with Q and trusting Grassley.
Yup.
And with so much "pork" added to most bills (at least until there are single-item bills), the REASON(S) for someone's vote may be JUST as important as their vote.
Q also said "Trust Wray" and "Trust Kansas" (Pompeo). Do you trust them, too?
I've said this before. Q didn't say whether to trust that Grassley is good or trust that he is bad. Trust that he will do the right thing, or trust that he will do the wrong thing. We mostly all think we are supposed to trust that he will be good, but none of us really know if that was disinformation or not. Same with trust Kansas and trust Sessions.
I don't know myself, but I do know if someone is in the govt for as long as Grassley it doesn't usually end up that they were good. I mean - look at the recent examples... Cocaine Mitch, Pelosi, Feinstein, Biden, Waters, and countless more on both sides of the aisle.
IMO, Pompeo and Wray have proved themselves to be untrustworthy. Regarding Sessions, I honestly believe he did more during Trump's first term than we know. I think he was responsible for authoring and filing many of the sealed indictments back then, and set the stage for many of the prosecutions that we will see soon. Remember, Trump45 = FA and Trump47=FO.
Exactly. A better way of saying what I was originally trying to say is "Trust xxxxx to be themselves". I think that is exactly what Q meant when saying "Trust xxxxx". Pompeo (likely "Kansas") will always Pompeo. Sessions always seemed like a greeter at a country auction that will shake your hand and give you a lice of pie.
Langford is no surprise,i don't know how we elected that fuktard.
We need to primary him.
Primary them all.
Agreed! Like I said, the only surprise I found on the list is Grassley. I'm beginning to think his "corn" tweets weren't comms, and were actually about corn.
LOL 🤣 this whole time....if that's true I would smack him upside the head with a stalk of corn.
The temptation would be strong.
He may have flipped sides.
They may have given him a couple hundred acres of land,so he could plant more corn.....
This statement is worth much more introspection than this.
How DID we elect him? If we go back, are we able to spot any signs? Is he actually bad or is it just this?
We should spend some time digging on how people got into office and what signs there were of them being corrupted to watch out for.
I figured Hawley and Cotton would be on that list. Maybe there is hope for them....maybe.
They have potential, but it's like they both go into an occasional bipolar trance.
Or, they get reminded of something they owe someone.
Could be.
Well so much for trust grassley
I hate it, because I like the old guy.
Me too
A simple check of their personal finances and those of their family would be illuminating. A chart of their net worth starting from the beginning of their first term until today might show us where the problem lies.