From the Mod Team:
Please be respectful and constructive while digging into the JFK Files. Racism is strictly prohibited on this Forum, but we will be especially watching all of the threads for ANY covert or overt racism towards any cultural peoples being discussed; and more heavily in the JFK Files!
Blanket racism will not be tolerated. Call out the person, or if you need to speak of the Elite Jewish Leaders, Palestinian Elite Leaders, Khazarian Elite Leaders, or Russian Elite Leaders, use these constructive terms instead of blanket racism towards “Those Jews!”, or “The Khazarians!” And post your reason or even info link why you’re responding a certain way. Be Constructive Not Destructive!
Why? Because the common folk just trying to survive in their Countries have NOTHING MUCH TO DO With their Elite unsmart leaders. So let’s be better Anons and not “blanket blame” common folk for continued Elite-Cabal idiocy please.
Fair Warning given so keep the discussions clean Anons. Thank you.
Judaism is their religion.
Perfect! Yours is the idiotic garbage that this post is addressing. Thanks for giving everyone an example.
don't know which post you're referring to, but this quote comes to mind...think we should be able to discuss anything freely, or else we'll never get to the truth.
"For if Men are to be precluded from offering their Sentiments on a matter, which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences, that can invite the consideration of Mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of Speech may be taken away, and, dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the Slaughter".
George Washington
I agree with you. Having an intelligent discussion about ANY topic should never be off limits.
It's the generalizing, stereotyping and racist hatred that is not conducive. For example if a topic of a post has a "berg" or "stein" in their last name it's Defcon 1 and everybody on this forum (there are a LOT) that dislike Jews all come out with their nose puns and general vile hatred. Or if a black person is in a headline for being an idiot they get called a jogger which is obviously a substitute for a racist slur.
It's despicable, unintelligent, and I would never link this forum to any normies for that reason. It's out of control here.
Ok, let's try Catholics. Are all Catholics pedos?
Why are you asking me? I was correcting ashlandog, who said Zionism was a Jewish religion, which it is not, Judaism is the name for the Jewish religion. Zionism is the political will of establishing a Jewish state. Which it did in 1957, it was a political ideology established in 1897. Again, not a religion but a political vision for an exiled people at the time of its inception.
You want history? here is some for you, the term Jews comes from the great grandson of Abraham whose name and later, tribe, was called Judah. Judah's offspring became the inhabitants of the largest province of early Israel called Judea. The neighboring Arabs referred to the entire people as Jews based off of Israel's most populated province called Judea.
This thread is about the ban hammer coming down on those people who insist on bashing a race of people called Jews. I'm getting piled on for pointing out the Jewish religion is called Judaism not Zionism, I really have no clue what is wrong with you people.
Catholics aren't a race of people either, last I checked, they are a religious order founded by the Roman emperor Constantine. They are not all pedo's but a huge portion of their clergy sure seem to be, just like our politicians, teachers and camp counselors.
That might be right and all, but where did Ashland say anything about Judaism?
You have a hard time with comprehending a thread it appears, so I will clarify.
ashlandog wrote > ... Zionism is their religion ....
I replied, > Judaism is their religion
And then a bunch of tools piled on me acting stupid and down voted me for some reason.
especially youth group counselors at churches. Adults that prefer to volunteer to be in the company of children creep me out. If its a paid position, thats one thing. But volunteers? weird cases
Opps. A little off on the chronology there; Constantine was the 88th Pope (they tended not to survive long)
Constantine WAS one of the last Byzantine Popes.
If you check your Bible there were a number of churches - (Paul wrote to most if not all) the Church at Antioch, Smyrna, and there my spelling gives out. Rome was only one Church but once it was made official by the politically powerful Constantine things changed (for one thing the head of the church had a better lifespan.
Emperor Constantine the Great and Pope Constantine are two different people separated by many hundreds of years.
Constantine the Great legalized Christianity in Rome in 313AD and gradually made it the state religion of the Roman Empire, thus the name HRCC (Holy Roman Catholic church). In contrast, Pope Constantine was Bishop of Rome between 708 - 715AD
Simon Peter the apostle of Christ died in 63AD but was posthumously considered (by Catholics) to be the 1st Pope of the HRC. Yet, the creation of the Catholic church did not take place for almost 300 after St. Peter's death.
I was addressing the Catholic church (or rather their clergy) in my comment, not the many hundreds of early Christian sects that existed in the 300 years prior to the institution of the HRCC.
EDIT: Interestingly there were 33 "Bishops of Rome" before Christianity was no longer outlawed in Rome and the institutional implementation of the HRCC took place. The first Bishops of Rome were Peter, Linus, Anacletus, Clement I, ... etc. None of them lasted very long before they were thrown to the lions in the colosseum, crucified, or martyred in some way. None the less, there was no such thing as Catholicism until the 4th century AD.
https://www.christian-history.org/list-of-all-popes.html
Yes! I knew there was a reason my catholic neighbors always counting my steps behind me on the morning walk! I should tell them we have machines for that & they can convert to a new hobby 😅
I saw a chart the other day about that. It showed child sexual abuse from some time in the last 10 or so years with numbers of Catholic priests charged versus numbers of teachers charged. I don't remember the actual numbers but it was like 90/10 teachers over priests. I saw it on an OAN news story and can't find the chart online.
My gut says to believe it, but my mind says there are way more teachers than priests so the numbers will be skewed. It is also more common for priests to be charged than teachers, although both organizations historically have tried to push the perps to another location to make the problem "go away".
Both groups have a fair amount of pedos, but also a fair amount of good people. Both are also shielded and/or demonized by both the left and right. The only good course of action is to closely watch both groups if your children are around them - trust but verify.
id leave my kid with a teacher over a priest any day of the week
u/#glowie