I think the USMCA may complicate the tariffs on Canada and Mexico. This trade agreement likely has some specific details on what can and cannot be done with Tariffs. The reason the Fentanyl Emergency was used for justification is likely a carve-out in the USMCA to apply additional tariffs.
We don't have a USMCA with all these other countries so it is probably easier to just say we're going to charge you half the tariff you charge us and we reserve the right to raise them further. There is a baseline 10% for all countries, because it appears all countries charge the US at least 10% and that is a matching tariff.
For Canada and Mexico, the existing fentanyl/migration IEEPA orders remain in effect, and are unaffected by this order. This means USMCA compliant goods will continue to see a 0% tariff, non-USMCA compliant goods will see a 25% tariff, and non-USMCA compliant energy and potash will see a 10% tariff. In the event the existing fentanyl/migration IEEPA orders are terminated, USMCA compliant goods would continue to receive preferential treatment, while non-USMCA compliant goods would be subject to a 12% reciprocal tariff.
Hey HANDSHAKE (yeah, since thatโs what you are) why did you edit your post and remove what you actually called me to โfkโ??? If you wanted to tone down your post, why not delete it instead?
Seems like youโre not just a shill but also a coward. Hell you didnโt even call me a full on name but โfkโโฆ. Really? Be a man, geeze.
I challenge you to edit your post back from (the ghey โfkโ) to the original term. Iโll wait.
For Canada and Mexico, the existing fentanyl/migration IEEPA orders remain in effect, and are unaffected by this order. This means USMCA compliant goods will continue to see a 0% tariff, non-USMCA compliant goods will see a 25% tariff, and non-USMCA compliant energy and potash will see a 10% tariff. In the event the existing fentanyl/migration IEEPA orders are terminated, USMCA compliant goods would continue to receive preferential treatment, while non-USMCA compliant goods would be subject to a 12% reciprocal tariff.
Mexico and Canada have already bent the knee and removed their tarrifs.
is that why they are not on the list?
I think the USMCA may complicate the tariffs on Canada and Mexico. This trade agreement likely has some specific details on what can and cannot be done with Tariffs. The reason the Fentanyl Emergency was used for justification is likely a carve-out in the USMCA to apply additional tariffs.
We don't have a USMCA with all these other countries so it is probably easier to just say we're going to charge you half the tariff you charge us and we reserve the right to raise them further. There is a baseline 10% for all countries, because it appears all countries charge the US at least 10% and that is a matching tariff.
Time to get rid if the USMCA. It was junk from the moment it was signed.
Didn't Trump sign the USMCA?
For Canada and Mexico, the existing fentanyl/migration IEEPA orders remain in effect, and are unaffected by this order. This means USMCA compliant goods will continue to see a 0% tariff, non-USMCA compliant goods will see a 25% tariff, and non-USMCA compliant energy and potash will see a 10% tariff. In the event the existing fentanyl/migration IEEPA orders are terminated, USMCA compliant goods would continue to receive preferential treatment, while non-USMCA compliant goods would be subject to a 12% reciprocal tariff.
Why donโt you find it and get back to us HANDSHAKE?
Sure, HANDSHAKE, sure.
Now go get the fucking proof boy.
Hey HANDSHAKE (yeah, since thatโs what you are) why did you edit your post and remove what you actually called me to โfkโ??? If you wanted to tone down your post, why not delete it instead?
Seems like youโre not just a shill but also a coward. Hell you didnโt even call me a full on name but โfkโโฆ. Really? Be a man, geeze.
I challenge you to edit your post back from (the ghey โfkโ) to the original term. Iโll wait.
For Canada and Mexico, the existing fentanyl/migration IEEPA orders remain in effect, and are unaffected by this order. This means USMCA compliant goods will continue to see a 0% tariff, non-USMCA compliant goods will see a 25% tariff, and non-USMCA compliant energy and potash will see a 10% tariff. In the event the existing fentanyl/migration IEEPA orders are terminated, USMCA compliant goods would continue to receive preferential treatment, while non-USMCA compliant goods would be subject to a 12% reciprocal tariff.