It's difficult to take you seriously when you post things like this.
You just make a complete mockery of this elite research board when you don't even bother to read the articles you're linking.
This is the blurb under the photo, so you don't even have to read the article to see that your premise of them "surrendering" is just asinine:
EU pauses counter-tariffs against US after Trump backs down on tariff hike
Or maybe you did read it, but just didn't comprehend what it said.
"EU pauses". Not drops. Pauses.
"After Trump backs down on tariff hike". That means he did it first.
So if pausing tariffs is a form of "surrender", then we have surrendered to the entire group of countries we put tariffs on, except China. Since we kept the Chinese tariffs.
The more posts I read from you, the more certain I am that you're a troll here to make people think we're all ignorant fascists. Just like normies think we are. 🤨
I understand your point except, Trump didn't surrender, 70+ countries called in to negotiated. It is simply a pause while negotiations take place, it is not a full win yet, but it is certainly no loss or surrender. It shoes Trump is a deal maker, like we all are aware. He wants to make a deal.
I was pointing out the error in the "logic" the other person was using.
Because they said the EU "surrendered" because they paused their tariffs.
I was pointing out that Trump paused our tariffs first.
So, if pausing tariffs constitutes "surrendering" (it doesn't), then it would mean that Trump surrendered as well, because he did the exact same thing.
It's a "What's good for the goose is good for the gander" type situation.
I really don't know how to make it anymore clear than I already have.
It's not "name calling" when it's an accurate assessment of what you are. Obviously fascists don't like to be called out as fascists. Neither do trolls like to be called out as trolls nor do hypocrites like to be called out as hypocrites.
Nowhere in your original post, or anywhere else until I pointed out that the article itself contradicted your statements, did you say anything about their truthfulness being questionable.
When someone makes a claim, such as you did in saying that the EU surrendered, and they link an article, it's because they're using that article to support their statement.
To link an article that you don't even trust to be true to support your statement makes zero sense. NONE.
Exactly, and then they were posting other things like maga this and maga that. There are glowies that lurk here, and I believe a rothschild did, (says he's not part of that family) or he did on the boards, I can't remember exactly where but I remember him posting about Q on twitter a couple years back.
Even with that these forums have their share of intelligent people I enjoyed your discourse earlier. I know enough about the tarriffs to believe that it'll work out and I'm not stressed about it, but posts like yours helped lay things out clearly. So thank you for that.
Me I'm here for the long run, been following Q stuff since 2018 or 19 can't remember lol and I've been on these forums since Cat messaged me on TDW and invited me here.
I mostly watch, and pray, not out of fear, but it's a huge undertaking and some intercession doesn't hurt at all.
It's not even just the source. You don't even believe the article is true...except the part of the article that you've somehow interpreted to mean they've surrendered.
This is why I think you're a troll.
If you're not a troll, then you actually are what normies believe to be the worst of us. An ignorant, and hypocritical, fascist.
Yes, in my opinion, all of those terms fit you well.
I can have that opinion, and I can express that opinion.
If me expressing my opinion bothers you, you have three options.
Don't behave in such a way that would warrant me expressing that opinion.
You could just ignore my opinion.
You could block my posts so you don't have to read my opinion.
Feel free to do any of those things. Because I'm not going to change my opinion of you, or stop expressing that opinion when you post things like this.
Well, he did pause our tariffs on them first, so...
I'm not at all criticizing President Trump, but it's not really "surrendering" to lower their tariffs when we "surrendered" first by pausing our tariffs first.
The first raising of the tariffs occurred early last week, up 400% to 10%. Then all the world and the leftists started screaming and dooming and threatening retaliation. Then Trump responded by putting on the reciprocal tariff rates. That caused the rest of the world, except China, to call for negotiations and wanting to come and talk and lower their tariffs. Trump response was to pause the reciprocal tariffs, but the 10% tariffs are still in place. That is a 400% increase from where our tariffs were originally. The 90 day pause is still a win, that is my point. Have a good day fren, I am just trying to add perspective and the great negotiating genius Trump has used to still make this all a win.
Before all this began, our tariffs were at 2.5%. Trump raised them to 10% then all the complaining and dooming and threats of retaliation occurred. Trump then put up the reciprocal tariffs based on what each country had on our imports. Trumps pause to allow those who did not retaliate and showed a desire to negotiate only brought the tariffs back to the 10% which is now being collected. Trump raised the tariffs universally 400% and you call that "surrendering". You clearly are not seeing the "Art of the Deal" that is being used.
I'm not sure why you deleted your post and then reposted, but on the chance you didn't see my reply to it:
No, I am not calling it "surrendering".
I am pointing out the flaw in RussiaIsAlwaysRight's logic here that other countries are "surrendering" by pausing their tariffs.
It wasn't President Trump's action of raising the tariffs that I was speaking of. It was President Trump pausing those tariffs.
I apologize for not making that excruciatingly clear
Sometimes I wonder at the maturity level of people on this board. Is always pointing out what someone has posted the correct thing to do? Maybe just read the articles for yourselves and decide what you want to believe and leave it at that. Don't post or say anything. This is part of the reason I'm selective in how I post. Most of the time I won't reply to someone else because it leads to this kind of behavior. Done with rant.
At this rate, Canada (besides China) will be the only country with high tariffs, because our leaders are so f'n stupid to see the writing on the wall. But then again, we have an election coming up.
Before all this began, our tariffs were at 2.5%. Trump raised them to 10% then all the complaining and dooming and threats of retaliation occurred. Trump then put up the reciprocal tariffs based on what each country had on our imports. Trumps pause to allow those who did not retaliate and showed a desire to negotiate only brought the tariffs back to the 10% which is now being collected. Trump raised the tariffs universally 400% and you call that "surrendering". You clearly are not seeing the "Art of the Deal" that is being used.
It's difficult to take you seriously when you post things like this.
You just make a complete mockery of this elite research board when you don't even bother to read the articles you're linking.
This is the blurb under the photo, so you don't even have to read the article to see that your premise of them "surrendering" is just asinine:
EU pauses counter-tariffs against US after Trump backs down on tariff hike
Or maybe you did read it, but just didn't comprehend what it said.
"EU pauses". Not drops. Pauses.
"After Trump backs down on tariff hike". That means he did it first.
So if pausing tariffs is a form of "surrender", then we have surrendered to the entire group of countries we put tariffs on, except China. Since we kept the Chinese tariffs.
The more posts I read from you, the more certain I am that you're a troll here to make people think we're all ignorant fascists. Just like normies think we are. 🤨
I love the mods but this is a strange sticky, especially after reading all the comments.
u/#ShilliVanilli
I understand your point except, Trump didn't surrender, 70+ countries called in to negotiated. It is simply a pause while negotiations take place, it is not a full win yet, but it is certainly no loss or surrender. It shoes Trump is a deal maker, like we all are aware. He wants to make a deal.
Again, I'm not saying Trump surrendered.
I was pointing out the error in the "logic" the other person was using.
Because they said the EU "surrendered" because they paused their tariffs.
I was pointing out that Trump paused our tariffs first.
So, if pausing tariffs constitutes "surrendering" (it doesn't), then it would mean that Trump surrendered as well, because he did the exact same thing.
It's a "What's good for the goose is good for the gander" type situation.
I really don't know how to make it anymore clear than I already have.
got it, sorry. I am getting to used to the types I am arguing with on X.
I need to remember that GA is 95% frens. 😀
It's not "name calling" when it's an accurate assessment of what you are. Obviously fascists don't like to be called out as fascists. Neither do trolls like to be called out as trolls nor do hypocrites like to be called out as hypocrites.
Nowhere in your original post, or anywhere else until I pointed out that the article itself contradicted your statements, did you say anything about their truthfulness being questionable.
When someone makes a claim, such as you did in saying that the EU surrendered, and they link an article, it's because they're using that article to support their statement.
To link an article that you don't even trust to be true to support your statement makes zero sense. NONE.
I do however enjoy being labeled the most intelligent commenter on GAW!
You are definitely the most intelligent commenter on GAW!
The most handsome as well, with your cute blue hat. 🙂
Name calling.
You spout arrogant comments like other citizen patriots "learning their place" not even realizing how tyrannical that sounds.
You'd be happy if the USA just took over and ruled everyone else? Creepy.
The op deleted similar comments they made on this thread hood catch on this one
I honestly do think they're a troll. I had to call Poe's Law on them and they doubled down on it.
If not, they are seriously into fascism and proud of it.
What's concerning is how many other Anons just clap and agree with everything they say.
It really doesn't do much to help defend ourselves when normies dismiss everyone here as fascists.
Exactly, and then they were posting other things like maga this and maga that. There are glowies that lurk here, and I believe a rothschild did, (says he's not part of that family) or he did on the boards, I can't remember exactly where but I remember him posting about Q on twitter a couple years back.
Even with that these forums have their share of intelligent people I enjoyed your discourse earlier. I know enough about the tarriffs to believe that it'll work out and I'm not stressed about it, but posts like yours helped lay things out clearly. So thank you for that. Me I'm here for the long run, been following Q stuff since 2018 or 19 can't remember lol and I've been on these forums since Cat messaged me on TDW and invited me here. I mostly watch, and pray, not out of fear, but it's a huge undertaking and some intercession doesn't hurt at all.
Thanks. I'm glad that you were able to get something positive from my posts. ✌️
It truly is a big problem in my opinion.
Especially for a place that takes such pride in being an elite research board.
I upvote the removal of the sticky.
Not good enough.
Pay for your own defense.
Allow free speech.
End the unelected bureaucracy and stop cheating in elections.
Then we can talk about what else you need to do to satisfy our requirements.
Trump Militia arriving in Europe to accept surrender is only a matter of time
counter tariffs is not a sign of surrender lol
....
They didn't drop them. They just paused them for 90 days...just like we did. First.
Did you even read the article you listed?
Or, hell, that info is on the blurb under the article photo.
Why are you using sources you don't even trust?
It's not even just the source. You don't even believe the article is true...except the part of the article that you've somehow interpreted to mean they've surrendered.
This is why I think you're a troll.
If you're not a troll, then you actually are what normies believe to be the worst of us. An ignorant, and hypocritical, fascist.
Yes, in my opinion, all of those terms fit you well.
I can have that opinion, and I can express that opinion.
If me expressing my opinion bothers you, you have three options.
Don't behave in such a way that would warrant me expressing that opinion.
You could just ignore my opinion.
You could block my posts so you don't have to read my opinion.
Feel free to do any of those things. Because I'm not going to change my opinion of you, or stop expressing that opinion when you post things like this.
I'm truly curious what it is about this post that people downvoted me on it.
What do they disagree with?
That I'm allowed to have an opinion and express that opinion?
Or my pointing out the options the other person has if they don't like my opinion.
Kind of really ties into that whole normie idea about fascists...
Not the best of stickies, I must say....Not Accurate at all....
Well, he did pause our tariffs on them first, so...
I'm not at all criticizing President Trump, but it's not really "surrendering" to lower their tariffs when we "surrendered" first by pausing our tariffs first.
No, I am not calling it "surrendering".
I am pointing out the flaw in RussiaIsAlwaysRight's logic here that other countries are "surrendering" by pausing their tariffs.
It wasn't President Trump's action of raising the tariffs that I was speaking of. It was President Trump pausing those tariffs.
I apologize for not making that excruciatingly clear.
I just want to say that I appreciate yours and walkofftgledges comments here tg You both give excellent explanations on how this all works. Thank you.
The first raising of the tariffs occurred early last week, up 400% to 10%. Then all the world and the leftists started screaming and dooming and threatening retaliation. Then Trump responded by putting on the reciprocal tariff rates. That caused the rest of the world, except China, to call for negotiations and wanting to come and talk and lower their tariffs. Trump response was to pause the reciprocal tariffs, but the 10% tariffs are still in place. That is a 400% increase from where our tariffs were originally. The 90 day pause is still a win, that is my point. Have a good day fren, I am just trying to add perspective and the great negotiating genius Trump has used to still make this all a win.
Why do you keep reposting this info? I've already read it and responded to it. TWICE.
Before all this began, our tariffs were at 2.5%. Trump raised them to 10% then all the complaining and dooming and threats of retaliation occurred. Trump then put up the reciprocal tariffs based on what each country had on our imports. Trumps pause to allow those who did not retaliate and showed a desire to negotiate only brought the tariffs back to the 10% which is now being collected. Trump raised the tariffs universally 400% and you call that "surrendering". You clearly are not seeing the "Art of the Deal" that is being used.
I'm not sure why you deleted your post and then reposted, but on the chance you didn't see my reply to it:
Sometimes I wonder at the maturity level of people on this board. Is always pointing out what someone has posted the correct thing to do? Maybe just read the articles for yourselves and decide what you want to believe and leave it at that. Don't post or say anything. This is part of the reason I'm selective in how I post. Most of the time I won't reply to someone else because it leads to this kind of behavior. Done with rant.
I'm not quite sure I understand what you're saying.
Are you saying that if we see a post that is clearly inaccurate, we shouldn't say anything about it, just leave it be and move on to somewhere else?
At this rate, Canada (besides China) will be the only country with high tariffs, because our leaders are so f'n stupid to see the writing on the wall. But then again, we have an election coming up.
Do you really want this many Liberal snow-mexicans voting in an American elections?
Before all this began, our tariffs were at 2.5%. Trump raised them to 10% then all the complaining and dooming and threats of retaliation occurred. Trump then put up the reciprocal tariffs based on what each country had on our imports. Trumps pause to allow those who did not retaliate and showed a desire to negotiate only brought the tariffs back to the 10% which is now being collected. Trump raised the tariffs universally 400% and you call that "surrendering". You clearly are not seeing the "Art of the Deal" that is being used.
I reposted, it was the post above yours that you were replying to, not below. Have a great day fren!
I was actually replying to the response below you, you are right fren, sorry I got it posted in the wrong order.