Vigano can not be a Pope because he is loyal to our Lord Jesus Christ. The Vatican is loyal to the globalists. Robert Prevost is a Puppet Pope. I wish a lot of catholics will stop their reverance to the Vatican. We catholics can continue go be good catholics by following our religion, but not the Vatican agenda.
They were like pavlova dogs as soon as they say white smoke, they wore masks, took jabs, distanced and obeyed all commands - sheep fed by wolves will take the mark of the beast. Covid showed just how easy it will be!,
A cult is an organisation which demands members adhere to their opinions dogmas etc on pain of exile, removal, excommunication, death. You can have no opinion nor challenge opinions of the organisation.
Millions of us have opinions and challenge the organization.
Are you a member of a religion? Does it have dogma?
We follow the teachings of the Catholic faith so we blew off Francis.
Opinions - yes you can but as your comment above Vigano was excommunicated for his views - that's a cult.
I guess he was lucky not to have lived in earlier times 14/15 century when William Sawtre, John Badby, and William Taylor were all burned at the stake in Smithfield, London, the list of other burned at the stake former Catholics is long!
As for myself - over a decade ago God called my wife and I out of the UK Methodist Church where we had been teachers and preachers for decades - to lad small house group style within a short period they have gone fully apostate and not have only homosexual ministers with same sex spouses.
We now consider ourselves just a members of the Church of Jesus - no more dogma.
As for dogma's every church has them, indeed about the only thing that the multitude of churches have in common is that God came as Jesus to die to pay for our sins - and sadly are happy to point the finger at everyone else and denounce them as heretical.
The church in Rome, like all the other churches in the 1st century, only had an internal leadership structure. The churches did not submit to one uber-church or uber-bishop. Once the church in Rome begun to control the other churches is where the corruption began. Now we have a single man who thinks he can just claim authority over every christian worldwide, and even over secular rulers! It's insane.
We need to return to independent local assemblies of believers, and drop all this nonsense.
During Paul's lifetime (AD 5–67), the church in Rome was not a formal, centralized institution but rather a network of house churches—small groups of believers gathering in private homes. There was no single "cathedral" or designated public worship space, as Christianity was still an illegal and persecuted faith under Roman rule.
Key Features of the Early Roman Church:
House Churches – Believers met in homes (Romans 16:5, 16:10, 16:11, 16:14–15), often hosted by wealthier members who had space. These were intimate gatherings centered on teaching, fellowship, and the Lord’s Supper (Acts 2:42–47).
Jewish & Gentile Mix – The church likely began among Jewish converts (Acts 2:10 mentions Jews from Rome at Pentecost) but grew rapidly with Gentile believers, causing tensions Paul addresses in Romans (e.g., Romans 14 on dietary laws).
No Formal Hierarchy – No pope or single bishop existed yet. Leadership included elders (presbyters) and deacons (Philippians 1:1), but authority was decentralized.
Paul’s Influence – Though Paul had not yet visited Rome when he wrote his epistle (Romans 1:10–13), he knew many believers there (Romans 16) and planned to strengthen them (Romans 1:11). He later arrived as a prisoner (Acts 28:14–31).
Persecution & Secrecy – After Nero’s pogrom (AD 64), Christians avoided public worship. The catacombs and homes served as hidden meeting places.
Contrast with Later Roman Catholicism:
No Papacy: Peter’s later presence in Rome (traditionally martyred there c. AD 64–67) didn’t equate to papal supremacy. Early churches operated independently.
No Mass: Worship was simple—scripture, prayer, and communal meals (1 Corinthians 11:17–34).
The Roman church was organic, persecuted, and radically different from the later institutionalized Roman Catholic Church.
The church likely began among Jewish converts - of course it did did the thing not read the book of Acts?
The church are Rome predated Paul by a long while - he only wants to go Rom 1:11-13 so he can have glory - he calls it fruit but its for him, and he wants to impart some 'spiritual gift so they be established - they were already established! Was my understanding that Jesus is building His Church!
Lol yeah, the first christians were Israelites who believed their Messiah. Then non-Israelites believed and were added also. So the church indeed began by Israelites.
Do you not think Paul was called by Jesus to be a missionary? You seem to hold him in disdain and I'm interested where you got that conclusion (if I'm hearing you correctly that is)
Vigano absolutely should be the pope.
He was warning the public many years ago against the evil.
He was excommunicated.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mDJDefUbPKse
Might still happen
🎬 🍿
Vigano can not be a Pope because he is loyal to our Lord Jesus Christ. The Vatican is loyal to the globalists. Robert Prevost is a Puppet Pope. I wish a lot of catholics will stop their reverance to the Vatican. We catholics can continue go be good catholics by following our religion, but not the Vatican agenda.
God Loves YOU!
They were like pavlova dogs as soon as they say white smoke, they wore masks, took jabs, distanced and obeyed all commands - sheep fed by wolves will take the mark of the beast. Covid showed just how easy it will be!,
Not true
what is not true?
That Catholic's were like Pavlov dogs.
The broadcast them whooping and cheering as soon as their was white smoke. Now is seems they chose a WEF/Illuminati/OWG type
It's possible to be faithful to the church established by Jesus Christ, and not be faithful to the freemasons who have infiltrated it
Vigano is a Christian so he doesn’t qualify.
Absolutely. Vigano would have been the best pick.
Meet the new poap...
Same as the old poap...
Agree but Francis excommunicated Vigano. If Pope Leo is as bad as Francis, I would';t be surprised to see a schism. Vigano could lead the true Church.
That would be wonderful. Perhaps that’s God’s plan after all.
The Catholic church can only oust him from their cabal - being a Christian is not the same as being a member of a cult!
LOL, the Catholic Church is not a cult.
A cult is an organisation which demands members adhere to their opinions dogmas etc on pain of exile, removal, excommunication, death. You can have no opinion nor challenge opinions of the organisation.
Millions of us have opinions and challenge the organization. Are you a member of a religion? Does it have dogma? We follow the teachings of the Catholic faith so we blew off Francis.
Opinions - yes you can but as your comment above Vigano was excommunicated for his views - that's a cult.
I guess he was lucky not to have lived in earlier times 14/15 century when William Sawtre, John Badby, and William Taylor were all burned at the stake in Smithfield, London, the list of other burned at the stake former Catholics is long!
As for myself - over a decade ago God called my wife and I out of the UK Methodist Church where we had been teachers and preachers for decades - to lad small house group style within a short period they have gone fully apostate and not have only homosexual ministers with same sex spouses.
We now consider ourselves just a members of the Church of Jesus - no more dogma.
As for dogma's every church has them, indeed about the only thing that the multitude of churches have in common is that God came as Jesus to die to pay for our sins - and sadly are happy to point the finger at everyone else and denounce them as heretical.
Happy that worked for you! My faith works for me.
The church in Rome, like all the other churches in the 1st century, only had an internal leadership structure. The churches did not submit to one uber-church or uber-bishop. Once the church in Rome begun to control the other churches is where the corruption began. Now we have a single man who thinks he can just claim authority over every christian worldwide, and even over secular rulers! It's insane.
We need to return to independent local assemblies of believers, and drop all this nonsense.
Dont believe so 1AD churches met in homes, no mass assembly buildings, all that came much later as the state Church.
I asked AI about this, I don't think we disagree
During Paul's lifetime (AD 5–67), the church in Rome was not a formal, centralized institution but rather a network of house churches—small groups of believers gathering in private homes. There was no single "cathedral" or designated public worship space, as Christianity was still an illegal and persecuted faith under Roman rule.
Key Features of the Early Roman Church:
House Churches – Believers met in homes (Romans 16:5, 16:10, 16:11, 16:14–15), often hosted by wealthier members who had space. These were intimate gatherings centered on teaching, fellowship, and the Lord’s Supper (Acts 2:42–47).
Jewish & Gentile Mix – The church likely began among Jewish converts (Acts 2:10 mentions Jews from Rome at Pentecost) but grew rapidly with Gentile believers, causing tensions Paul addresses in Romans (e.g., Romans 14 on dietary laws).
No Formal Hierarchy – No pope or single bishop existed yet. Leadership included elders (presbyters) and deacons (Philippians 1:1), but authority was decentralized.
Paul’s Influence – Though Paul had not yet visited Rome when he wrote his epistle (Romans 1:10–13), he knew many believers there (Romans 16) and planned to strengthen them (Romans 1:11). He later arrived as a prisoner (Acts 28:14–31).
Persecution & Secrecy – After Nero’s pogrom (AD 64), Christians avoided public worship. The catacombs and homes served as hidden meeting places.
Contrast with Later Roman Catholicism:
The Roman church was organic, persecuted, and radically different from the later institutionalized Roman Catholic Church.
Ah bless the liddle AI's heart!
The church likely began among Jewish converts - of course it did did the thing not read the book of Acts?
The church are Rome predated Paul by a long while - he only wants to go Rom 1:11-13 so he can have glory - he calls it fruit but its for him, and he wants to impart some 'spiritual gift so they be established - they were already established! Was my understanding that Jesus is building His Church!
Lol yeah, the first christians were Israelites who believed their Messiah. Then non-Israelites believed and were added also. So the church indeed began by Israelites.
Do you not think Paul was called by Jesus to be a missionary? You seem to hold him in disdain and I'm interested where you got that conclusion (if I'm hearing you correctly that is)
Why do you think Prevost was 'approved' so quickly?
Scaramucci pope? Then Vigano. Some do not last long.
could have a terrible May, no?
I like it 👍
Time to let the Catholics of the world choose their Pope!!
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1920546876652388352/vid/avc1/1920x1080/xDiAUdqii3fWD5lM.mp4
The roman church is finished unless it can continue to duped millions into keeping it going.
Its managed to do so for 1600+ years what makes you think things will change now?