Sure they do. They did. Just how many airplanes hit buildings anyway? You talk like there is some database of zillions of similar events. These events were unique. And they happened. Start from the fact that they happened, not from the presumption that they couldn't happen. The presumption is wrong.
The problem with the plane idea is that Building 7 collapsed the same way but was never hit by a plane. As far as I can tell, no other similar building has ever collapsed into its own footprint at free-fall speed anywhere in the world due to fire.
I saw a video clip of the fighting in either Syria or Gaza where a missile hit the footing of a multi-story building (maybe 6-7 stories) and it collapsed like a concertina.
I guess we just ignore all the reports by first responders regarding explosions coming from the building, not to mention the Israeli art students who just so happened to have worked on the exact same floors that those planes hit?
Don't pay any attention to Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, and fell into it's footprint at freefall speed as well (which is impossible unless it was rigged for demolition).
"Explosions"...or windows bursting from compressed air of the downfalling mass? A tire blow-out at 50 psi sure sounds (and acts) like an explosion. And, wow, people who happened to work on the same floor that the planes hit? Like the floors were supposed to be unoccupied?
Building 7 is its own problem. But since the Twin Towers fell into their own footprint, that sort of suggests it is not impossible.
I was referring to the lobby and basement which firefighters and police reported explosions, nice try deflecting to the plumes. They weren't employees either. They were Israeli "art students", just like the dancing Israelis who were there to "document the event".
You sound like a fuckin fed, honestly. I cannot take you seriously.
Planes do fly into buildings and buildings are designed to cope with that eventuality. A B-25 flew into the Empire State Building in 1945, for instance.
Yes. I like to reference it. No other examples, however. Much smaller and slower than a fully loaded 767. And the Twin Towers did cope with it, admirably. It couldn't cope with the fire.
What about Building 7? Everybody likes to think a question of knowledge is an argument. It isn't. I've seen one analytical reconstruction of that event that seemed to be consistent with the known facts.
Buildings hit by planes do not collapse at free-fall speed into their footprint.
Sure they do. They did. Just how many airplanes hit buildings anyway? You talk like there is some database of zillions of similar events. These events were unique. And they happened. Start from the fact that they happened, not from the presumption that they couldn't happen. The presumption is wrong.
The problem with the plane idea is that Building 7 collapsed the same way but was never hit by a plane. As far as I can tell, no other similar building has ever collapsed into its own footprint at free-fall speed anywhere in the world due to fire.
If you can find one, please let me know.
I saw a video clip of the fighting in either Syria or Gaza where a missile hit the footing of a multi-story building (maybe 6-7 stories) and it collapsed like a concertina.
I think you have just confirmed that the way to make it happen is to use explosives rather than fire.
This tower did not collapse and is still standing.
I guess we just ignore all the reports by first responders regarding explosions coming from the building, not to mention the Israeli art students who just so happened to have worked on the exact same floors that those planes hit?
https://markdotzler.com/Mark_Dotzler/WTC_Artists.html
Don't pay any attention to Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, and fell into it's footprint at freefall speed as well (which is impossible unless it was rigged for demolition).
Which BBC reported before it happened
"Explosions"...or windows bursting from compressed air of the downfalling mass? A tire blow-out at 50 psi sure sounds (and acts) like an explosion. And, wow, people who happened to work on the same floor that the planes hit? Like the floors were supposed to be unoccupied?
Building 7 is its own problem. But since the Twin Towers fell into their own footprint, that sort of suggests it is not impossible.
I was referring to the lobby and basement which firefighters and police reported explosions, nice try deflecting to the plumes. They weren't employees either. They were Israeli "art students", just like the dancing Israelis who were there to "document the event".
You sound like a fuckin fed, honestly. I cannot take you seriously.
Planes do fly into buildings and buildings are designed to cope with that eventuality. A B-25 flew into the Empire State Building in 1945, for instance.
Yes. I like to reference it. No other examples, however. Much smaller and slower than a fully loaded 767. And the Twin Towers did cope with it, admirably. It couldn't cope with the fire.
Building 7?
What about Building 7? Everybody likes to think a question of knowledge is an argument. It isn't. I've seen one analytical reconstruction of that event that seemed to be consistent with the known facts.