Most US oil is not suitable to be converted into gasoline, thus is is shipped off to Europe so they can burn it in their furnaces for winter and we import zillions of barrels of sweet crude from the middle east. If we sell this new windfall for a nice markup then we might put a small dent in out national debt, but I think President Trump already has a way to deal with the debt that doesn't include raping our natural resources and selling it off to the highest bidder.
Pennsylvania, California, Alaska, and Texas EACH have more oil and gas than Saudi Arabia. The US has enough coal for 100 years of power at 2x current generation rate. Nuclear power can quadruple base load in 10 years if “enviro-tards” are neutralized. It is our energy and we have the authority and intent to use it. Also, most “natural resources” like oil, gas, and water are self-renewing at different rates. How exactly do you “rape” something that is self-renewing? I think you meant “harvest”. /s
Just the known oil and gas reserves have enough energy for the next 300 - 500 years.
But there's mo' money in pretending the globe is warming and we're all choking on toxic exhaust fumes and about to run out of oxygen if we don't fork over the carbon tax to Them Who Know Better What to Do With Your Money Than You Do.
I was referring to plundering our natural resources like a drunk liberal would plunder a innocent lady on the street and then say "it's her fault for being pretty". Rape, plunder, renewal,.... I'm not for leaving scars on the surface or fracking underground and spoiling the water table, but I'm in favor of mining our assets in a way which leaves as little residue as possible. Maybe is mis-chose that particular word, but I just don't want President Trump to release the hounds to trash the earth simply for the sake of a profit. There is a line which I think we can draw to get the resources without spoiling the land in the process. Reclamation comes to mind, and that should be in the monetary equation before a spade of dirt is overturned.
Fair point. Obviously, globalist corporations in the past have INTENTIONALLY been allowed/encouraged (IMO) to create as much environmental destruction as possible so that it could later be used as justification to restrict national resource development. Engineered problem + Propaganda = Desired result (poor nations, stolen resources, destroyed environment, restricted development). Cloward-Piven 101: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy
Globalist corporations steal and have no interest in nations or development to benefit The People. National (or nationalist) corporations pay fair market price (generally) to acquire assets and develop them for the nation while making a profit. We shall judge by fruits, not words.
Plunder? Exactly what should we do it? If you were thirsting in the desert and had one gallon of water the worst thing you could do is conserve the water. If we need to use the resources to become solvent again the thats what we should do.
Most US oil is not suitable to be converted into gasoline, thus is is shipped off to Europe so they can burn it in their furnaces for winter and we import zillions of barrels of sweet crude from the middle east. If we sell this new windfall for a nice markup then we might put a small dent in out national debt, but I think President Trump already has a way to deal with the debt that doesn't include raping our natural resources and selling it off to the highest bidder.
Pennsylvania, California, Alaska, and Texas EACH have more oil and gas than Saudi Arabia. The US has enough coal for 100 years of power at 2x current generation rate. Nuclear power can quadruple base load in 10 years if “enviro-tards” are neutralized. It is our energy and we have the authority and intent to use it. Also, most “natural resources” like oil, gas, and water are self-renewing at different rates. How exactly do you “rape” something that is self-renewing? I think you meant “harvest”. /s
Just the known oil and gas reserves have enough energy for the next 300 - 500 years.
But there's mo' money in pretending the globe is warming and we're all choking on toxic exhaust fumes and about to run out of oxygen if we don't fork over the carbon tax to Them Who Know Better What to Do With Your Money Than You Do.
I was referring to plundering our natural resources like a drunk liberal would plunder a innocent lady on the street and then say "it's her fault for being pretty". Rape, plunder, renewal,.... I'm not for leaving scars on the surface or fracking underground and spoiling the water table, but I'm in favor of mining our assets in a way which leaves as little residue as possible. Maybe is mis-chose that particular word, but I just don't want President Trump to release the hounds to trash the earth simply for the sake of a profit. There is a line which I think we can draw to get the resources without spoiling the land in the process. Reclamation comes to mind, and that should be in the monetary equation before a spade of dirt is overturned.
Fair point. Obviously, globalist corporations in the past have INTENTIONALLY been allowed/encouraged (IMO) to create as much environmental destruction as possible so that it could later be used as justification to restrict national resource development. Engineered problem + Propaganda = Desired result (poor nations, stolen resources, destroyed environment, restricted development). Cloward-Piven 101: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy
Globalist corporations steal and have no interest in nations or development to benefit The People. National (or nationalist) corporations pay fair market price (generally) to acquire assets and develop them for the nation while making a profit. We shall judge by fruits, not words.
cA.pTAin PLaNeT wILL saEV Us!
Plunder? Exactly what should we do it? If you were thirsting in the desert and had one gallon of water the worst thing you could do is conserve the water. If we need to use the resources to become solvent again the thats what we should do.