"βIt is normal for viruses to mutate and change over time,β Dr Alex Allen, Consultant Epidemiologist of UKHSA said, adding that it continues to monitor all strains of Covid in the UK."
Yes, it is normal for viruses to mutate, but such mutations are nearly ALWAYS to more benign, less harmful forms. If a virus "mutates" to a strong variant, it's probably due to gain of function laboratory interference than natural.
What few people realize is the way the brainwashed scientism-ists do "genetic assembly" to INVENT their Frankenstein-esque boogeyman-viruses. The last time I heard a count, in mid-2022 the count was over 400,000 "variants" of CONVID. This process is what they call "genetic sequencing" which they do for all living, known life forms........except for phake and ghey boogeyman-viruses.
Because nobody can find boogeyman-viruses in reality - e.g. in the fluids or tissues of a sick human or animal - they have to MANUFACTURE what they fraudulently CLAIM to be boogeyman-viruses. From 1954 to 1999 they used their phony-baloney "viral culturing" manufacturing technique. But in the last 25-odd years, they prefer their "genetic assembly" manufacturing technique.
Their technique all starts with a completely made-up "model" of what these scientismists CLAIM that a boogeyman-viruses genetically looks like. Recalling of course, that they can't find them in reality.
Now, these scientismists (virologists) take a sample of tissue/fluid from a sick person and run in through a genetic sequencing software program. They instruct the program to remove all known and catalogued human RNA/DNA strands from the mixture. This leaves them with a hodgepodge mixture of tiny bits and pieces of unknown, uncatalogued strands of RNA/DNA.
And here's the big "look the other way" part that all virologists must agree to. All those tiny bits of RNA/DNA that is uncatalogued and is therefore of "unknown provenance" is what they use as the basis of building their imaginary boogeyman-viruses. When they are asked the very simple and obvious question -> "Could those bits and pieces of unknown RNA/DNA simply be broken-down human RNA/DNA?". The virologists are forced to admit that it COULD BE...and in fact, that some of it is CERTAINLY exactly this.
And to wit, they can't differentiate between broken down human RNA/DNA and what they CLAIM is broken down boogeyman-virus RNA/DNA, as it's all made of the same basic building blocks of nucleic acid - (A) adenine; (C) cytosine: (G) guanine; (T) thymine (and in RNA exclusively (U) uracil.
All life forms, bar none, are made of these 4/5 basic building blocks. Simply put, you could throw a frog, carrot, dog, lettuce, mosquito into a blender and take the resulting RNA/DNA bits and pieces and use a genetic sequencing software program to assemble the human genome (genetic profile).
If you can understand this, you can then understand how they ASSEMBLE fairy-tale boogeyman-viruses out of their mixtures. And then it becomes painfully obvious how every time a virologist runs a unique sample of human fluids and tissues through their sequencing software, the software builds a "slightly different" version of a boogeyman-virus that looks similar to, but never identical to their original man-made "model" of a boogeyman-virus. Hence, 400,000 variants. In fact, they've never built the EXACT SAME boogeyman-virus once. Every run through the sequencing software generates a new and unique "variant".
It's worth noting also that these virologists have never find a FULLY INTACT BOOGEYMAN-VIRUS in their fluid and tissue samples. They have billions upon billion of strands of RNA/DNA, some which match fully defined human genetics...but never a fully intact boogeyman-virus.
The best analogy to explain this is as follows. Imagine we go to the Library of Congress, remove all copies of Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet", then shred every book in the library. And then task someone with piecing together all the shreds of books to re-assemble the words (RNA/DNA) that constitute the Romeo and Juliet book. Obviously, this could be easily done as Romeo and Juliet is just a collection of English letters and words, just as all life forms are a collection of letters (ATGCU).
And this is EXACTLY how virologists ASSEMBLE what they fraudulently claim are boogeyman-viruses. They could just as easily instruct their software programs to assemble partial carrots, mosquitoes, frogs, dogs, humans, etc.
If you get it, the obvious question is; "well why don't these virologists and scientismists arrive at these painfully obvious conclusions?". And I'd say, that is the $64K question, isn't it? The only answer I can offer you is, they're profoundly brainwashed. Nothing else makes sense.
These scientismists gave up trying to transfer fluids of sick people to healthy people in the early 1950s because it never worked. They then shifted to their silly "viral culturing" manufacturing technique for the next 50 years to hide their failures at proving germ theory at large. And now the whole "discipline" is even further obfuscated by this genetic assembly nonsense.
Germ theory is a a hoax. Contagion is a myth. And boogeyman-viruses don't even exist. It's this simple. This is what REAL SCIENCE demonstrates. But it's not what the controlling cabal wants. They want their slaves to be fearful which causes them to give all their power away to cabal-endorsed experts.
This is their game. You can play theirs or yours. It's your choice.
Their 8UII-5H1T variant can FK-0V
https://odysee.com/@HumanitysVault:a/Hear-Me-Loud-and-Hear-me-Clear---There-is-No-Covid---Never-Was---It's-a-Magic-Show---Amandha-Vollmer:4
She swears lots too π€
Is it time to see the VET YET? π€π€¨π
When they tried that they ended up with Monkeypox.
π€£π€£ supreme dad joke ππ»
What the vaccine's did was lower/hurt the immune system permanently. This is the sales job to cover that up.
Think Mad Men.
Ok. So, why don't we make up a new variant and sell more product?
You sir are not one of my vassels?
Cheers though!
So this new "variant" is a disease of the vaccinated. Yup, sounds about right.
"βIt is normal for viruses to mutate and change over time,β Dr Alex Allen, Consultant Epidemiologist of UKHSA said, adding that it continues to monitor all strains of Covid in the UK."
Yes, it is normal for viruses to mutate, but such mutations are nearly ALWAYS to more benign, less harmful forms. If a virus "mutates" to a strong variant, it's probably due to gain of function laboratory interference than natural.
πππ Thank you!
At least I can laugh at some people driving alone in their cars with masks again... I missed that.
Donβt forget the mask over the air ventsπ
This again? Iβm played outta of this garbage
They don't mutate as quickly as this, they mutate over the course of many years
What few people realize is the way the brainwashed scientism-ists do "genetic assembly" to INVENT their Frankenstein-esque boogeyman-viruses. The last time I heard a count, in mid-2022 the count was over 400,000 "variants" of CONVID. This process is what they call "genetic sequencing" which they do for all living, known life forms........except for phake and ghey boogeyman-viruses.
Because nobody can find boogeyman-viruses in reality - e.g. in the fluids or tissues of a sick human or animal - they have to MANUFACTURE what they fraudulently CLAIM to be boogeyman-viruses. From 1954 to 1999 they used their phony-baloney "viral culturing" manufacturing technique. But in the last 25-odd years, they prefer their "genetic assembly" manufacturing technique.
Their technique all starts with a completely made-up "model" of what these scientismists CLAIM that a boogeyman-viruses genetically looks like. Recalling of course, that they can't find them in reality.
Now, these scientismists (virologists) take a sample of tissue/fluid from a sick person and run in through a genetic sequencing software program. They instruct the program to remove all known and catalogued human RNA/DNA strands from the mixture. This leaves them with a hodgepodge mixture of tiny bits and pieces of unknown, uncatalogued strands of RNA/DNA.
And here's the big "look the other way" part that all virologists must agree to. All those tiny bits of RNA/DNA that is uncatalogued and is therefore of "unknown provenance" is what they use as the basis of building their imaginary boogeyman-viruses. When they are asked the very simple and obvious question -> "Could those bits and pieces of unknown RNA/DNA simply be broken-down human RNA/DNA?". The virologists are forced to admit that it COULD BE...and in fact, that some of it is CERTAINLY exactly this.
And to wit, they can't differentiate between broken down human RNA/DNA and what they CLAIM is broken down boogeyman-virus RNA/DNA, as it's all made of the same basic building blocks of nucleic acid - (A) adenine; (C) cytosine: (G) guanine; (T) thymine (and in RNA exclusively (U) uracil.
All life forms, bar none, are made of these 4/5 basic building blocks. Simply put, you could throw a frog, carrot, dog, lettuce, mosquito into a blender and take the resulting RNA/DNA bits and pieces and use a genetic sequencing software program to assemble the human genome (genetic profile).
If you can understand this, you can then understand how they ASSEMBLE fairy-tale boogeyman-viruses out of their mixtures. And then it becomes painfully obvious how every time a virologist runs a unique sample of human fluids and tissues through their sequencing software, the software builds a "slightly different" version of a boogeyman-virus that looks similar to, but never identical to their original man-made "model" of a boogeyman-virus. Hence, 400,000 variants. In fact, they've never built the EXACT SAME boogeyman-virus once. Every run through the sequencing software generates a new and unique "variant".
It's worth noting also that these virologists have never find a FULLY INTACT BOOGEYMAN-VIRUS in their fluid and tissue samples. They have billions upon billion of strands of RNA/DNA, some which match fully defined human genetics...but never a fully intact boogeyman-virus.
The best analogy to explain this is as follows. Imagine we go to the Library of Congress, remove all copies of Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet", then shred every book in the library. And then task someone with piecing together all the shreds of books to re-assemble the words (RNA/DNA) that constitute the Romeo and Juliet book. Obviously, this could be easily done as Romeo and Juliet is just a collection of English letters and words, just as all life forms are a collection of letters (ATGCU).
And this is EXACTLY how virologists ASSEMBLE what they fraudulently claim are boogeyman-viruses. They could just as easily instruct their software programs to assemble partial carrots, mosquitoes, frogs, dogs, humans, etc.
If you get it, the obvious question is; "well why don't these virologists and scientismists arrive at these painfully obvious conclusions?". And I'd say, that is the $64K question, isn't it? The only answer I can offer you is, they're profoundly brainwashed. Nothing else makes sense.
These scientismists gave up trying to transfer fluids of sick people to healthy people in the early 1950s because it never worked. They then shifted to their silly "viral culturing" manufacturing technique for the next 50 years to hide their failures at proving germ theory at large. And now the whole "discipline" is even further obfuscated by this genetic assembly nonsense.
Germ theory is a a hoax. Contagion is a myth. And boogeyman-viruses don't even exist. It's this simple. This is what REAL SCIENCE demonstrates. But it's not what the controlling cabal wants. They want their slaves to be fearful which causes them to give all their power away to cabal-endorsed experts.
This is their game. You can play theirs or yours. It's your choice.
if the PCR test is barely better than flipping a coin to even detect someone has covid, how are they pinpointing different variants that people have?
Where is people's common sense?
For years they told us variants become weaker not stronq.