The term "Khazarian Mafia" was coined by a man named Gordon Duff. Gordon publishes articles at a website called Veterans Today.
The research below will demonstrate that Gordon Duff is a man who absolutely hates Trump. He absolutely hates Q. He has TDS and has made claims about Trump so outrageous that he makes CNN look fair and balanced.
Why am I posting this article? Because he is ground zero when it comes to all commentary and research on the Khazarian Mafia.
What is the original document outlining the "Khazarian Mafia"?
The document, published on March 11, 2015, is available here:
When did the term "Khazarian Mafia" come into use?
The term was apparently first coined by Gordon Dufff, during a "Syrian Conference on Combatting Terrorism and Religious Extremeism" on December 1, 2014.
At the Syrian Conference on Combating Terrorism and Religious Extremism (December 1, 2014), in his keynote address, Veterans Today Senior Editor and Director Gordon Duff disclosed publicly for the first time ever
Was the term "Khazarian Mafia" ever used before then?
No.
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=2010-03-12%202025-04-12&q=khazarian%20mafia&hl=en
The timing of Gordon Duff publishing his original document coincides with the huge initial spike in search interest on Google.
Who are the people who coined and defined the term "Khazarian Mafia"?
The original conference speech in 2014 was given by Gordon Duff. The original document oulining the contents of the speech was posted in 2015 by Preston James and Mike Harris.
Preston James and Mike Harris list Gordon Duff as an informational reference in their document.
Do the authors of the "Khazarian Mafia" document and speech have anything in common?
They all work for the Veterans Today website http://veteranstoday.com/
Gordon Duff, referred to as Veterans Today "Senior Editor", manages the "world's largest private intel organization" and regularly consults governments: https://veteranstoday.com/author/gordonduff/
Gordon is an accredited diplomat and is generally accepted as one of the top global intelligence specialists.
Preston James claims he has ties to "Intel": https://veteranstoday.com/author/jim/
Retired after serving the community for over 36 years during which time there were numerous contacts with those associated with Intel and Law Enforcement.
Mike Harris is Veteran's Today Financial Editor who worked for congress: https://veteranstoday.com/author/harris/
Mr. Harris served as a technical advisor to the Committee on Science and Technology of the US Congress, as well as sitting as Chairman of various boards over the years
What is Does Gordon Duff Think of Trump?
Donald Trump is a Hoax, Only a Bit Gay and Jewish as Well
https://veteranstoday.com/2018/04/28/donald-trump-is-a-hoax-and-only-a-bit-gay-and-jewish-as-well/
The real “ring of truth.” Let’s say you are a testosterone-charged “man’s man,” visiting Moscow with two of the best of the best of Russia’s call girl community in your hotel room. Every drug imaginable is available and your history is exactly that, or is claimed to be, drug and sex orgies with supermodels, prostitutes, porn queens and even “not so willing” hotel maids.
Instead, you pay them to urinate on a bed. Some might call it a waste. Others might call it something else, a minor “in the closet” secret for some, but a “huuge” secret for the former “Queen” of New York’s underground club scene of the 70’s and 80’s.
What does Gordon Duff think of Q?
We are seeing, though Qanon deception, a Trump regime steeped in the occult, steeped in ritual child abuse and in hatred of conventional Christianity.
The article insists Trump is the one participating in child sacrifice because of "qanon".
What else does Gordon Duff think of Trump?
Here he is accusing Trump of being guilty in 10 child rape cases.
Five of the six alleged incidents took place at two of Trump’s best-known properties — Trump Tower in New York City and Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, FL. The exception is incident No. 4, which is the most recent (2012) and took place at Albemarle Estate at Trump Winery. Donald and Eric Trump opened the facility as a bed-and-breakfast in May 2015.
What kind of information does Veterans Today push?
Since authors at Veterans Today are the origin of the Khazarian Mafia story, and because the authors claim to have high intel sources -- it is valuable to see what other kinds of information VT is engaged in.
Gordon Duff calling "qanon" Horse Shit:
Veterans Today gloating over the fact that Trump was banned from Facebook for 2 years:
https://veteranstoday.com/2021/06/04/facebook-dumps-trump-for-two-years/
Editor’s Note: What can I say? It could not happen to a more ‘un-nice guy’. This is an indication that the freebie publicity that Trump so loved will be turned off at Facebook through the next midterm Congressional elections.
Veterans Today stated Q is fake, and because of that ... people didn't rise up with their guns like they were supposed to.
https://veteranstoday.com/2019/03/13/qanon-hope-and-heartbreak/
Q (or QAnon) promised an end to these things, BY SO DOING SERVED ITS MAJOR PURPOSE: a lot of the most outraged and activist people deferred doing anything confrontational and kept their AR-15s on the mantle in the (ultimately vain) hope that some part of the system in some way would correct itself. So they waited and hoped, and kept waiting and hoping…
In summary, if they have bad research and bad takes on Trump and Q, why should anyone believe they have superior research skills when it comes to the Khazarian Mafia? If they don't believe the hundreds of solid Q proofs that were provided, how good of researchers could they really be? And what is the likelihood, with all their ties to intel, that they are simply engaged in pushing a psyop?
"Khazarian hypothesis" = some guy guesses about the genetics of Ashkenazi jews.
Do you think that somehow negates anything in my original post?
You harp on Gordon Duff and the term he uses. I show that is irrelevant.
Khazarian Mafia is completely 100% different than the Khazarian hypothesis.
They have as much in common as French people and French fries. The only thing similar is "Khazarian".
One is a guy guessing ethnicity of a group of people, the other insists that the Jews are responsible for everything evil in the world.
I can only presume you haven't read anything about the Khazarian hypothesis.
But you do dispute the Khazarian origin idea common to both Koestler and Duff.
Let me steelman your argument back to you in order to see if I understand your question properly.
The Khazarian hypothesis says Jews might come from Turkey instead of the middle east -- that's all, nothing more nothing less. No insinuation of "name stealers", no implications of anything sinister about them -- just a "hey, their genetics might come from this area instead of that area" ...
Then the next step is you want everyone to believe this is a previous recognition of all the theories behind the Khazarian Mafia -- that somehow use of the "Khazarian" term by Koestler is recognition of the concepts behind the Khazarian Mafia -- i.e. name stealers, that Jews are in control, etc.
Yes, I dispute that Koestler's use of the term has anything to do with Khazarian mafia. And no, I'm not just going to assume the name stealers and all the other rhetoric -- I'm sure if you had a reference for those you would have already used it.
It all started with Duff. Nothing about Koestler has anything to do with the concepts behind the Khazarian mafia or name stealers rhetoric.
the other insists that the Jews are responsible for everything evil in the world.
but isn’t that actually true?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7L9io-b9Uew
This is exactly what I'm talking about.
The CCP has 2 million spies in the US. They had hundreds of thousands of ballots that they burned at their embassy that were going to be used to overturn our elections.
You are completely oblivious to them as a threat. Will you hold up a photo of Mao standing next to a Jew 80 years ago and claim that Jews control China?
That's the problem with you guys. Any incredible piece of evidence and a jetpack to make a 1000-mile leap of logic is all you need to believe. You're gullible.
Being completely oblivious to all threats except the ones that come from Israel isn't something worth boasting about. Q believers are able to comprehend the threat of Mossad / Israel, but also multitask into seeing all the other threats out there without discounting them because there's no Jew to be seen.
The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler merely makes a hypothesis as to the race of the people, whereas the Veterans Today "intel asset" author who coined the term Kazarian Mafia blames them for all the world's problems.
Quite the difference
You should amend your OP to add clarity to the nuance pertaining to The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler. Just to shut the stupidity down. people love their pet psyops don't they?
Great post, I've been yelling that the whole "Jews run the world" psyop is coming from high level cabal intel assets for about three years now. This adds concrete support to that. (Well, I go one step further into the throne room of satan in Vatican City, but that's for another post 😆
Regardless of where the term comes from, genetic studies and linguistic analysis disproves the Khazarian hypothesis and it's a common trope to discredit Jewish history. Why would the Cohen priestly class that only passes down the male chromosome, share the same haplogroup across Ashkenazi's, Sephardim, and Mizrahis? It would not be possible if they were converted Turks. Also 30-60% of Ashkenazi DNA comes from the Levant. There was a poorly conducted study from a scientist that was out looking for it that tried to show Turkish origins and that study was later discredited.
Ted Pike did a documentary almost 40 years ago, where he went into a synagogue and showed a lot of information about what is in the Jewish Encyclopedia, which is the Jews' official documentation of their history.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6YiwvktXQryW
In it, we see references -- by Jews themselves -- that they are Edomites of biblical times, and also Khazarians of 1,200 years ago.
Their DNA has been mixed over the years with other races/ethnicities, as well.
Ashkenazi lived among the Germanic people and mixed to some degree with them. The Sephardics mixed with Turks and others. This is why there are differences in appearance among Jews, but they are all Jews.
There is no such thing as a "fake Jew."
We know that the Jews have a long history of name stealing. Goldberg is a German name, for example. Likewise, they falsely claim to be the Israelites of the Bible, when in fact they are descendants of the Edomites, who were mixed with Canaanites and Kenites.
Centuries later, some of them further mixed with Europeans, Asians, and others. There is some good evidence that many Hispanics have Jew blood in their ancestry, as well.
Hold on. The invented lore of muh "name stealers" is that actual Jewish people with actual Jewish last names went riding down the road on a cart, and were ransacked by bad people who killed them and then took over their names.
Demonstrating that Goldberg is only a German name would prove the exact opposite. At best you could claim that actual Jews were riding down the road in a cart, were ransacked, killed and then the bad guys refused to take their last names.
Also, when Jennifer Cohen marries Gerald Goldberg, and their children all receive the Goldberg last name, you think this is evidence that Gerald is a name stealer and thus proves the existence of the Khazarian Mafia?
You're a gullible lot.
That isn't the allegation. The allegation is that the Khazarians used to be bandits along the silk road who would murder travellers and assume their place. The people they murdered weren't Jewish people, they were just anyone who happened across the Khazarians.
The allegation further goes that Yaroslav I put a stop to it, forcing the Khazarians to convert from Tengrism to an Abrahamic religion. The Khazarians chose Judaism for its tradition of Babylonian Talmudism.
Why so offended? He is right the name changes are real historically.
I don't believe this to be true at all. Jews historically don't have last names, last names were adopted assimilate into European society. Goldberg just means gold mountain from German, but often they would use their profession as their last names as well. Traditionally, the last name was "Son of <your father's name>. It was common for conversos from the Spanish Inquisition would used nature or animals for their last names like Carneiro or Lobo, it doesn't make them name stealers. Also haven't denied that the cultures were mixed at some point in the line, but the Cohen or Levi traits would have passed down the paternal line based on the rules and this is proven to be true. If Ashkenazis were converted turks the Kohanim would not share the same haplogroup as Cohen's that are Sephardi or Mizrahi and they would not have 30-60% of their DNA from the Levant. That narrative just doesn't add up.
Based on biblical history and archaeology, I believe the Exodus narrative may not have occurred exactly as described in the Bible. Instead, for me it likely reflects the historical expulsion of the Hyksos from Egypt before the New Kingdom period. The Levites, possibly the only tribe originating from Egypt, were not allocated land in Israel but were dispersed across the kingdom to serve as priests and their names sound more Egyptian then the rest like Pinchas (Phinehas), Aaron (aḥa-rw), Hophni, and Moses (Egyptian word ms or mes meaning “born of"). Perhaps in relation to the expulsion of Akhenaten's monotheism; Moses is roughly 60–80 years after the abandonment of Atenism.
I believe Bibi Netanyahu also has a name change or two in his life.
But you didn't answer the question originally. Why would Cohens across the different regions share the same subclad of a haplogroup (J1c3d) if they were converted Turks? If they were converted Turks they would not share it.
Not to mention the 2013 study by Behar et al., titled "No Evidence from Genome-Wide Data of a Khazar Origin for the Ashkenazi Jews that did a more comprehensive analysis.
As a side note, I find it compelling that the tribe of Dan might be linked to the Denyen, a Sea Peoples group from the Bronze Age collapse who were of Aegean origin. The Song of Deborah (Judges 5:17) is said to be the oldest passage in the Torah, describes Dan as lingering “by the ships,” suggesting a maritime culture akin to the Denyen and was put in a negative light for not not helping like the other tribes. Archaeological finds at Tel Dan, like Aegean-style pottery. Jacob’s blessing in Genesis 49:16 (“Dan shall judge his people, as one of the tribes of Israel”) affirms their inclusion but it's interesting why Dan is singled out. Samson story (who comes from Dan) kind of reads like a Greek hero story. And were situated right above the Philistines, who were also of Greek descent and one of the Sea Peoples.