Let's reexamine Senate Anon
(kerfuffled1.wordpress.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
This was very interesting to read. I think the Senator that was discussed was David Vitter of LA. I wasn’t around for VOAT, but this does appear to be a first attempt by WHs to awaken individuals and get them to take action. Guess they were trying to figure out the best methods of getting their information across in order to prompt action.
Yeah, and to make sure the channel was secure for communications. One difference I noted is that SAnon wanted us to wear body cams and follow creeps around, whereas Q didn't. Q was 'we have it all'.
Correctamundo
Very good point. The body cam idea did seem quite dangerous.
Maybe wasn't talking to everyone.
Possibly. I wasn’t on VOAT so I don’t have the full context. Some info seems to be left out, but I wouldn’t know for sure.
Well, take a second and ponder what he is saying here:
You don't livestream or share the evidence with law enforcement or public officials, you collect the info that you can by casually investigating their inner circle, try to catch an interview with them and ask them questions about their relationships. People, especially local politicians and sheriffs, aren't good at on the spot disinfo or manipulation, they usually crack pretty easily, or at least give you more hints to what you should look into next. They are good at investigating others, but not good at being investigated themselves. Carrying a bodycam or any recording device is the same tactic they used for blackmail, so can we! We don't have to share anything with anyone we don't want to. Its only illegal to present that type of evidence in a court of law without the person knowing, but it doesn't matter if you don't pursue them in court or law enforcement. Just don't go public with the evidence on your own too quickly! The paranoia is what gets them, not the actual evidence.
All it takes is you giving that info to other anons, and now you have a community that has the same information that can go investigate even further. This is exactly how the chans and other internet sites were able to amass such a massive amount of information, and it only took a few leads to get it started (and i don't believe any were military), and it continues here. Only difference with Q is that the team wanted to solidify the direction we were going in and elevate our research capabilities, and a pulse check of sorts, i guess.
This is why he is saying we should have pushed harder on pizzagate. We were all over it, but we backed off from being afraid we would be targeted. We wouldn't have been, nor our lives probably really threatened because we are such a tight network they couldn't come after all of us at once. And even if they did, one would turn into thousands that would blow the whistle, and they would be cornered. This is why they live everyday in fear still, so the only thing they can do is run disinfo, demoralization ops against the populace and gaslight our friends and family into shunning us. Every single disinfo op since 9/11 has been targeted at us, in an attempt to keep us demoralized. A multi trillion dollar blood money behemoth, against a bunch of bumbling autists and retards.
Indeed. A very important distinction. Personally, I do not think Senate anon and Q were related. Very different tone and strategems.
Before the Q drop backchannel op went live, the military considered taking over the Obama gov by force/coup. The Q op was the alternative to a coup which would've resulted in civil war/bloodshed. So there was definitely a few factions including millitary intelligence making different moves leading up to the first Qdrop (plus some subterfuge and decoys in the mix). SenateAnon would probably tie in with all that.
The planned Obama coup was discussed frequently in early reddit/voat days, but those sources are almost impossible to find now. Obamas purging of senior military generals including high ranks is related (197 generals purged, including 37 four star generals according to grok...McKiernan, Mattis, and Flynn were the most well known).
https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2013/11/18/is-obama-purging-the-military-of-dissent/
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obama-fired-top-military-officers-align-pentagon-his-policy-vision-now-trump-set-do-same
Also the nuke that went missing for 36 hours in 2007 was thought to be related.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_United_States_Air_Force_nuclear_weapons_incident
I had forgotten about this statement by SenateAnon: "Everyone freaked out about pizzagate. You guys backed off too soon, and stayed too geographically isolated. This goes on everywhere. You can take them down and they know it."
Thats very similar to the tweet by the NSA account in 2016 (NSA posted it months before the first Qdrop - similar timeframe to SenateAnon posts).
Qdrop 4588 included the exact same words.
Thank you for that information.
I updated the above with some links about Obamas purging of high military ranks (including Flynn) while all that was happening.
I had read somewhere, quite a while back, that Obama’s “purging” included killing high military ranks. Do you know if there’s any truth to that?
Voat.xyz/upgoat
Proud to be your 17th updoot, fren!