This dude is soooo onto it. I like him. Always a fire, tossle in an architectural contest winner, massive projects with no power tools and no population to speak of. Yep. All a lie. I think Freemasons call themselves that because they "found" all the masonry. IMHO
this is my fave documentary tbh, don't care who makes it cos it doesn't change the fact that these buildings exist? and so many questions need to be answered.. also to understand the current situation of this world we must go all the way back and understand or be aware of who the "game designers" are. I'd encourage you to give the video a shot, if 10 mnutes in you don't like it, just turn it off.. but a plethora of information in a nutshell you wouldn't find elsewhere. Cheers, Fren.
This dude is soooo onto it. I like him. Always a fire, tossle in an architectural contest winner, massive projects with no power tools and no population to speak of. Yep. All a lie. I think Freemasons call themselves that because they "found" all the masonry. IMHO
So, the Parthenon and other ancient Greek and Roman classic buildings were impossible? Block and tackle did not exist? The multiplicative pulley didn't exist? There were no horses and oxen? Better to understand how they were built, than to imagine how they were not.
Because "all of history" is not a lie. Things we thought were a lie (fiction) turned out to be true (e.g., Troy).
You can't prove a lie unless you have access to the truth. How can that be possible if everything is "all a lie"? If it is all a lie, there can be no history or knowledge. Technology would be impossible. Civilization would not happen.
Stop arguing. I'll think whatever I damn well please. If you think you're educating me, you're dumb, my IQ is 139 and I'm perfectly capable of holding multiple avenues of thoughts and reason in my mind at any given time. You have no idea what really happened 100 years ago because you weren't there and history is a set of agreed upon lies. Go research something and leave me alone.
Oh, sure. You can be impervious to reason because you want to be. Lots of wisdom in that.
And, sadly, the evidence is that I am not educating you. My IQ is 146 and I happen to be deeply concerned about how we know things, because I spent my adult life in technology, which is an impossibility if what we know is a lie. (You seem not to have contemplated the implications of your statement.) I may not know what really happened 100 years ago, but I surely know about 70 years ago, and my parents give me about another 30 years back from that. How old are you, that you can be so blithe about times you don't know anything about?
Your remark on history is barely an opinion, probably picked up somewhere else from a cynic. Again, how could anyone know this, without reference to the truth? If there is truth to refer to, then the statement is an internal contradiction.
You were the first one to toss out a bold statement, and I just followed up on it. It now appears you have no stomach for defending your position rationally. You just want to run away.
Go away. My words and thoughts are mine alone. Think whatever you want and just go away. You miss the whole point. I don't want to give you, nor do I owe you any explanation about anything. I have solid morals and a lot of experience. Now, do go research something and put in in a useful thread for the community and stop harassing people who don't exactly think like you. Pitiful.
Your words and thoughts here are public, so get used to them being considered and remarked. You want me to go away, but you don't want to go away. Or you would (at least from this encounter). The challenge is whether you can resist responding.
The point is whether what we know of the world is nothing but lies. You espouse it, I question it, and you are allergic to questions and logical implications. I don't think you have any confidence in your position.
I don't take reading or writing assignments from anyone. And, at last (!), you conclude with an insult. I love it. They are the seal of a failed debate.
So many anomalies, I visited this place in the arsehole of nowhere on an island in western Finland a couple of years back. Apparently built in 1812, no machinery, materials even roads locally.
A post office, no population, no city, nothing. But a two storey stone building with a basement was built. Just think of the materials required to build this structure, and the planning and precision. It’s crazy.
Yeah exactly, if you're going to build something like this with ancient tech like horses, carriages, ropes, labors, you need ALOT of people. But the population is scarce and the educated people skilled laborers were even more scarce back then.. how is it possible to carry such heavy materials back and forth only with horses and for them to build them so tall, why? so many questions.
Have you noticed the doors on these buildings are gigantic as well.. who were they building it for?
"Old World Order" documentary depicted it pretty well.
The term "L war & navy dept 1B" is likely a reference to a historical document classification system from the U.S. War Department, which operated until 1947
. Given that this type of file notation is no longer in use, its precise meaning depends on the specific era and context of the document from which it was taken.
Here is a breakdown of what the elements of the code likely signify:
L: In some historical military and naval classification systems, "L" designated a specific type of information or equipment. For example, during World War II, the U.S. Navy used "L" to classify gliders and other aircraft types.
War & Navy Dept: This refers to the United States War Department and the U.S. Navy Department. These were separate executive departments until they were merged in 1947 by the National Security Act, which created the National Military Establishment (later renamed the Department of Defense).
1B: This part of the code almost certainly refers to a specific subcategory within the larger document classification system. The U.S. War Department used a "Decimal File System" where numbers and letters represented different subjects and sub-subjects. The "1" would represent a major subject, and "B" would specify a particular file series or sub-topic under that heading.
This dude is soooo onto it. I like him. Always a fire, tossle in an architectural contest winner, massive projects with no power tools and no population to speak of. Yep. All a lie. I think Freemasons call themselves that because they "found" all the masonry. IMHO
Have you seen this documentary.. i think you'll enjoy it
Old World Order in Rumble LINK
Normally would be up my alley but very hesitant to trust a Stew Peters joint.
this is my fave documentary tbh, don't care who makes it cos it doesn't change the fact that these buildings exist? and so many questions need to be answered.. also to understand the current situation of this world we must go all the way back and understand or be aware of who the "game designers" are. I'd encourage you to give the video a shot, if 10 mnutes in you don't like it, just turn it off.. but a plethora of information in a nutshell you wouldn't find elsewhere. Cheers, Fren.
Free masonry? Why not? Lol
This dude is soooo onto it. I like him. Always a fire, tossle in an architectural contest winner, massive projects with no power tools and no population to speak of. Yep. All a lie. I think Freemasons call themselves that because they "found" all the masonry. IMHO
So many cities were “found”ed.
Yes!! I think he’s totally right in how that verbiage is used!
I agree.. that's why it's free, they found it ..kek
So, the Parthenon and other ancient Greek and Roman classic buildings were impossible? Block and tackle did not exist? The multiplicative pulley didn't exist? There were no horses and oxen? Better to understand how they were built, than to imagine how they were not.
Duh, I know the story. Jeez. Just a thought experiment. All of history is a lie, so why not?
Because "all of history" is not a lie. Things we thought were a lie (fiction) turned out to be true (e.g., Troy).
You can't prove a lie unless you have access to the truth. How can that be possible if everything is "all a lie"? If it is all a lie, there can be no history or knowledge. Technology would be impossible. Civilization would not happen.
Stop arguing. I'll think whatever I damn well please. If you think you're educating me, you're dumb, my IQ is 139 and I'm perfectly capable of holding multiple avenues of thoughts and reason in my mind at any given time. You have no idea what really happened 100 years ago because you weren't there and history is a set of agreed upon lies. Go research something and leave me alone.
Oh, sure. You can be impervious to reason because you want to be. Lots of wisdom in that.
And, sadly, the evidence is that I am not educating you. My IQ is 146 and I happen to be deeply concerned about how we know things, because I spent my adult life in technology, which is an impossibility if what we know is a lie. (You seem not to have contemplated the implications of your statement.) I may not know what really happened 100 years ago, but I surely know about 70 years ago, and my parents give me about another 30 years back from that. How old are you, that you can be so blithe about times you don't know anything about?
Your remark on history is barely an opinion, probably picked up somewhere else from a cynic. Again, how could anyone know this, without reference to the truth? If there is truth to refer to, then the statement is an internal contradiction.
You were the first one to toss out a bold statement, and I just followed up on it. It now appears you have no stomach for defending your position rationally. You just want to run away.
Go away. My words and thoughts are mine alone. Think whatever you want and just go away. You miss the whole point. I don't want to give you, nor do I owe you any explanation about anything. I have solid morals and a lot of experience. Now, do go research something and put in in a useful thread for the community and stop harassing people who don't exactly think like you. Pitiful.
Your words and thoughts here are public, so get used to them being considered and remarked. You want me to go away, but you don't want to go away. Or you would (at least from this encounter). The challenge is whether you can resist responding.
The point is whether what we know of the world is nothing but lies. You espouse it, I question it, and you are allergic to questions and logical implications. I don't think you have any confidence in your position.
I don't take reading or writing assignments from anyone. And, at last (!), you conclude with an insult. I love it. They are the seal of a failed debate.
So many anomalies, I visited this place in the arsehole of nowhere on an island in western Finland a couple of years back. Apparently built in 1812, no machinery, materials even roads locally.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/L4uxGyJgtxoei6GTA?g_st=ic
A post office, no population, no city, nothing. But a two storey stone building with a basement was built. Just think of the materials required to build this structure, and the planning and precision. It’s crazy.
Yeah exactly, if you're going to build something like this with ancient tech like horses, carriages, ropes, labors, you need ALOT of people. But the population is scarce and the educated people skilled laborers were even more scarce back then.. how is it possible to carry such heavy materials back and forth only with horses and for them to build them so tall, why? so many questions.
Have you noticed the doors on these buildings are gigantic as well.. who were they building it for?
"Old World Order" documentary depicted it pretty well.
https://rumble.com/embed/v55ycne/
I'm wondering what the lettering on the side of the trolley says.
Opening image in new tab and zooming in, best I can make out is L WAM & Navy DERTS
is it War & Navy department?
I asked AI
The term "L war & navy dept 1B" is likely a reference to a historical document classification system from the U.S. War Department, which operated until 1947 . Given that this type of file notation is no longer in use, its precise meaning depends on the specific era and context of the document from which it was taken. Here is a breakdown of what the elements of the code likely signify:
There are ample photographs of the U S Capitol being built. It was without a dome during the Civil War.
From the 1800s
https://x.com/mylunchbreak_/status/1963966334422675471?s=46