The Federal Government, under my auspices as President of the United States of America, has stepped into the complete criminal mess that was Washington, D.C., our Nation’s Capital. Because of this, D.C. has gone from one of the most dangerous and murder ridden cities in the U.S.A., and even around the World, to one of the safest - In just a few weeks. The “place” is absolutely booming, with restaurants, stores, and businesses packed and, for the first time in decades, virtually NO CRIME. It has been a beautiful thing to watch but, now, under pressure from the Radical Left Democrats, Mayor Muriel Bowser, who has presided over this violent criminal takeover of our Capital for years, has informed the Federal Government that the Metropolitan Police Department will no longer cooperate with ICE in removing and relocating dangerous illegal aliens. If I allowed this to happen, CRIME would come roaring back. To the people and businesses of Washington, D.C., DON’T WORRY, I AM WITH YOU, AND WON’T ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN. I’ll call a National Emergency, and Federalize, if necessary!!! Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!! President DJT
Joy-1-Daughter: I do hope that you are NOT EXPECTING OVERTIME??? Right?????
This is my first day to really post, laid up in heart ward, NOTHING Serious...Just PTSD COMING to the forefront!!!! But I love you're postingS so, please....KEEP THEM COMING!!!!!
Wonder what he means using the quotation marks around place? Maybe hinting that it can't be called a city? Thus, why does a non-city even need a mayor?
By definition, a mayor is an elected official of a city or town, and D.C. is neither.
No, you cannot declare D.C. the 51st state. As a matter of fact, no state can be declared into existence, or out of existence, but you know this.
Here is how D.C. would be handled.
The part of D.C. that was ceded by Maryland, and part ceded by Virginia, would go back to those states respectfully. Only an area, very small that comprises the White House, Congress, and other key government buildings would remain the District of Columbia.
The people of DC can vote on wanting to be a state, then send it to congress. Congress would hold a vote and a simple majority vote would send the approved move up to the President who just signs off on it like any other bill.
During that process the people of DC must create a state constitution and vote on its approval.
That's it. It's not a declaration, but it's not that hard either. How do you think we got West Virginia and South Dakota?
"expel all of our enemies from it and declare it the 51st state."
Your claiming FALSE something I never said fren.
I said: No, you cannot declare D.C. the 51st state. As a matter of fact, no state can be declared into existence, or out of existence then you launch off into some process by which D.C. might become a state.
You scenario where D.C. could become a state by local vote, and congressional actions has major hurdles. D.C. is not like West Va, or South Dakota
Process for D.C. Statehood D.C. cannot become a state through a local vote alone. Statehood would require a combination of local action, congressional approval, and potentially a constitutional amendment due to D.C.'s unique status.
The steps typically proposed are: Local Initiative: D.C. residents could vote in a referendum to express support for statehood, as they did in 2016 when 86% approved a statehood proposal. However, this vote is symbolic and has no legal effect without federal action.
The D.C. government could draft a state constitution, as it did in 2016, to outline the structure of a potential state (proposed name: "New Columbia" or "State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth").
Congressional Approval: Legislation: Congress must pass a bill to admit D.C. as a state. This would typically involve a simple majority in both the House and Senate, as seen with other states admitted under Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1, which governs the admission of new states.
Challenges: The bill would need to address D.C.'s federal district status. Most proposals suggest carving out a smaller federal enclave (e.g., encompassing the Capitol, White House, and key federal buildings) to preserve the constitutional requirement for a federal district, while granting the remaining residential and commercial areas statehood.
Presidential Approval: The president would need to sign the statehood bill into law, though a veto could be overridden by a two-thirds majority in Congress.
Potential Constitutional Amendment: Some scholars argue that D.C.'s status as the federal district means statehood could require a constitutional amendment to alter its designation under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17. An amendment would need:Two-thirds approval in both the House and Senate.
Ratification by three-fourths (38) of the states.
Others contend a simple act of Congress could suffice if the federal district is redefined, as Congress has plenary power over D.C. (e.g., precedents like the 1801 Organic Act or the 1973 Home Rule Act show Congress can modify D.C.'s governance without an amendment).
Key Obstacles Political Resistance: Statehood is politically contentious. D.C.'s heavily Democratic voting base (e.g., 92% voted for Biden in 2020) raises concerns among some Republicans about adding two likely Democratic senators, shifting Senate balance. This has historically stalled statehood bills (e.g., H.R. 51 passed the House in 2020 and 2021 but failed in the Senate).
Constitutional Debate: Some argue that creating a state from the federal district violates the Constitution's intent for an independent capital. Others counter that Congress’s authority over D.C. allows it to redefine the district’s boundaries.
23rd Amendment Issue: The 23rd Amendment (1961) grants D.C. electoral votes for president. If D.C. becomes a state, this amendment might need repeal or clarification, as the reduced federal enclave (with few residents) could still retain three electoral votes, creating an imbalance. Repeal would require a constitutional amendment.
Historical Precedent No federal territory like D.C. has become a state without significant federal action. Territories like Alaska and Hawaii became states through congressional acts after meeting criteria like population and governance stability. D.C.’s unique constitutional role complicates this process.
Retrocession (returning D.C. to Maryland, as was done with Virginia’s portion in 1846) is an alternative to statehood but faces resistance from both D.C. and Maryland residents. (This is what I mentioned in part)
Current Status (as of September 15, 2025) Recent legislative efforts, like H.R. 51, have pushed for statehood, but none have succeeded in becoming law. No major updates in 2025 (based on available data) indicate a change in D.C.’s status.
A local vote in D.C. can signal support but lacks legal weight without Congress acting. No single vote process within D.C. can achieve statehood due to its federal status.
Conclusion Washington, D.C., cannot become a state solely by a local vote due to its constitutional designation as the federal district. Statehood would require congressional legislation to admit D.C. as a state and likely redefine the federal district, with potential need for a constitutional amendment to address Article I and the 23rd Amendment. Political and legal challenges make this a complex process beyond D.C.’s unilateral control.
I appreciate you just went and asked ChatGPT and then vomited that response here, but this is saying exactly what I said. Locals vote, congress votes, locals make a constitution, president signs.
It's not rocket science, it's written in our own laws.
DC is considered "Occupied Territory" of the US, as I believe the British managed to bankrupt the US by creating the US civil war. Then they helped usher in The Organic Act of 1871, which sold out that patch of land as a sovereign entity to rule the rest of the US (therefore considered "occupied territory" of the US). Maybe a wordsmith or historian can correct that if I missed something or in error.
There are markers on the borders of DC. One side is the jurisdiction of the United States, the other side is the jurisdiction of Maryland. DC is the seat of the federal government. Outside of the Art 1 Sec 8 Clause 17 of the Constitution and a few special definitions in federal law, the Federal Government (United States) does not have general jurisdiction in the states of the union, but it does in DC, the territories, and federal enclaves.
In the general definitions of the Internal Revenue Code, DC is the United States, and not elsewhere.
Perhaps you remember a feature in Reader's Digest called Life in these United States. 'These' is used because in this case United States is plural. On the other hand, The United States is an entity, not are entities.
The Federal Government, under my auspices as President of the United States of America, has stepped into the complete criminal mess that was Washington, D.C., our Nation’s Capital. Because of this, D.C. has gone from one of the most dangerous and murder ridden cities in the U.S.A., and even around the World, to one of the safest - In just a few weeks. The “place” is absolutely booming, with restaurants, stores, and businesses packed and, for the first time in decades, virtually NO CRIME. It has been a beautiful thing to watch but, now, under pressure from the Radical Left Democrats, Mayor Muriel Bowser, who has presided over this violent criminal takeover of our Capital for years, has informed the Federal Government that the Metropolitan Police Department will no longer cooperate with ICE in removing and relocating dangerous illegal aliens. If I allowed this to happen, CRIME would come roaring back. To the people and businesses of Washington, D.C., DON’T WORRY, I AM WITH YOU, AND WON’T ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN. I’ll call a National Emergency, and Federalize, if necessary!!! Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!! President DJT
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/115206570863756188
This fits in with POTUS' message yesterday...
Teams on standby.
u/#q206
Joy-1-Daughter: I do hope that you are NOT EXPECTING OVERTIME??? Right?????
This is my first day to really post, laid up in heart ward, NOTHING Serious...Just PTSD COMING to the forefront!!!! But I love you're postingS so, please....KEEP THEM COMING!!!!!
Oh my fren! I thought you were quiet.
PRAYERS UP NOW! 🙏🤍
Take care fren...
"place"
Wonder what he means using the quotation marks around place? Maybe hinting that it can't be called a city? Thus, why does a non-city even need a mayor?
By definition, a mayor is an elected official of a city or town, and D.C. is neither.
How about that! Good catch.
You have been prepared for what is about to take place. DARK TO LIGHT. ENJOY THE SHOW! WWG1WGA!!! Q
u/#q3014
I REALLY DO HOPE that the MOAB lands COMPLETELY IN THEIR A$$ES and there is NO EXTRACTION!!!!!!!!....ohhh MY!!!!!
Get rid of Bowser. Send her on a charity mission to Afghanistan.
And send Donna Brazile with her!
Yes please federalize D.C. expel all of our enemies from it and declare ot the 51st state.
No, you cannot declare D.C. the 51st state. As a matter of fact, no state can be declared into existence, or out of existence, but you know this.
Here is how D.C. would be handled.
The part of D.C. that was ceded by Maryland, and part ceded by Virginia, would go back to those states respectfully. Only an area, very small that comprises the White House, Congress, and other key government buildings would remain the District of Columbia.
This is false.
The people of DC can vote on wanting to be a state, then send it to congress. Congress would hold a vote and a simple majority vote would send the approved move up to the President who just signs off on it like any other bill.
During that process the people of DC must create a state constitution and vote on its approval.
That's it. It's not a declaration, but it's not that hard either. How do you think we got West Virginia and South Dakota?
"expel all of our enemies from it and declare it the 51st state."
Your claiming FALSE something I never said fren.
I said: No, you cannot declare D.C. the 51st state. As a matter of fact, no state can be declared into existence, or out of existence then you launch off into some process by which D.C. might become a state.
You even admitted "It's not a declaration"
Hey, let's just take a breath, you're really riled up and getting emotional over this.
We're saying the same thing.
I hope you're ok fren.
Okay fren, but assure you I am not riled, or emotional over this.
Men can debate without loosing it.
Happy Trails To You!
You scenario where D.C. could become a state by local vote, and congressional actions has major hurdles. D.C. is not like West Va, or South Dakota
Process for D.C. Statehood D.C. cannot become a state through a local vote alone. Statehood would require a combination of local action, congressional approval, and potentially a constitutional amendment due to D.C.'s unique status.
The steps typically proposed are: Local Initiative: D.C. residents could vote in a referendum to express support for statehood, as they did in 2016 when 86% approved a statehood proposal. However, this vote is symbolic and has no legal effect without federal action.
The D.C. government could draft a state constitution, as it did in 2016, to outline the structure of a potential state (proposed name: "New Columbia" or "State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth").
Congressional Approval: Legislation: Congress must pass a bill to admit D.C. as a state. This would typically involve a simple majority in both the House and Senate, as seen with other states admitted under Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1, which governs the admission of new states.
Challenges: The bill would need to address D.C.'s federal district status. Most proposals suggest carving out a smaller federal enclave (e.g., encompassing the Capitol, White House, and key federal buildings) to preserve the constitutional requirement for a federal district, while granting the remaining residential and commercial areas statehood.
Presidential Approval: The president would need to sign the statehood bill into law, though a veto could be overridden by a two-thirds majority in Congress.
Potential Constitutional Amendment: Some scholars argue that D.C.'s status as the federal district means statehood could require a constitutional amendment to alter its designation under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17. An amendment would need:Two-thirds approval in both the House and Senate. Ratification by three-fourths (38) of the states.
Others contend a simple act of Congress could suffice if the federal district is redefined, as Congress has plenary power over D.C. (e.g., precedents like the 1801 Organic Act or the 1973 Home Rule Act show Congress can modify D.C.'s governance without an amendment).
Key Obstacles Political Resistance: Statehood is politically contentious. D.C.'s heavily Democratic voting base (e.g., 92% voted for Biden in 2020) raises concerns among some Republicans about adding two likely Democratic senators, shifting Senate balance. This has historically stalled statehood bills (e.g., H.R. 51 passed the House in 2020 and 2021 but failed in the Senate).
Constitutional Debate: Some argue that creating a state from the federal district violates the Constitution's intent for an independent capital. Others counter that Congress’s authority over D.C. allows it to redefine the district’s boundaries.
23rd Amendment Issue: The 23rd Amendment (1961) grants D.C. electoral votes for president. If D.C. becomes a state, this amendment might need repeal or clarification, as the reduced federal enclave (with few residents) could still retain three electoral votes, creating an imbalance. Repeal would require a constitutional amendment.
Historical Precedent No federal territory like D.C. has become a state without significant federal action. Territories like Alaska and Hawaii became states through congressional acts after meeting criteria like population and governance stability. D.C.’s unique constitutional role complicates this process.
Retrocession (returning D.C. to Maryland, as was done with Virginia’s portion in 1846) is an alternative to statehood but faces resistance from both D.C. and Maryland residents. (This is what I mentioned in part)
Current Status (as of September 15, 2025) Recent legislative efforts, like H.R. 51, have pushed for statehood, but none have succeeded in becoming law. No major updates in 2025 (based on available data) indicate a change in D.C.’s status. A local vote in D.C. can signal support but lacks legal weight without Congress acting. No single vote process within D.C. can achieve statehood due to its federal status.
Conclusion Washington, D.C., cannot become a state solely by a local vote due to its constitutional designation as the federal district. Statehood would require congressional legislation to admit D.C. as a state and likely redefine the federal district, with potential need for a constitutional amendment to address Article I and the 23rd Amendment. Political and legal challenges make this a complex process beyond D.C.’s unilateral control.
Thanks for the thorough breakdown anon
yw fren.
I appreciate you just went and asked ChatGPT and then vomited that response here, but this is saying exactly what I said. Locals vote, congress votes, locals make a constitution, president signs.
It's not rocket science, it's written in our own laws.
No they will get two commie senators.
Give the land back to maryland.
DC is considered "Occupied Territory" of the US, as I believe the British managed to bankrupt the US by creating the US civil war. Then they helped usher in The Organic Act of 1871, which sold out that patch of land as a sovereign entity to rule the rest of the US (therefore considered "occupied territory" of the US). Maybe a wordsmith or historian can correct that if I missed something or in error.
https://boundarystones.org/view.php?stone=EAST
There are markers on the borders of DC. One side is the jurisdiction of the United States, the other side is the jurisdiction of Maryland. DC is the seat of the federal government. Outside of the Art 1 Sec 8 Clause 17 of the Constitution and a few special definitions in federal law, the Federal Government (United States) does not have general jurisdiction in the states of the union, but it does in DC, the territories, and federal enclaves.
In the general definitions of the Internal Revenue Code, DC is the United States, and not elsewhere.
Perhaps you remember a feature in Reader's Digest called Life in these United States. 'These' is used because in this case United States is plural. On the other hand, The United States is an entity, not are entities.
What do you suppose "place" means?
You have been prepared for what is about to take place. DARK TO LIGHT. ENJOY THE SHOW! WWG1WGA!!! Q
u/#q3014
Well that's some positive news and made my day!
Now do California and arrest the LA Mayor and Governor Newsom.
And please restore our Second Amendment.
It's near impossible to purchase a firearm in CA.
Bowser belongs in a kennel.
Muriel Bowzer is a domestic terrorist. Arrest her for being a traitor.
YES! AND, Donna Brazile! 🤬
Who's Muriel Bowser? I don't watch the MSM. You guys are my news.
She's the Mayor of D.C.