brother, that man was adjusting his shirt sleeve. these low resolution videos are fueling the confusion. high resolution videos exist and anyone citing a low resolution, blurry, video for ants is selling something
The text in the link says it's a "tiny 1.5-inch barrel." If so, the accuracy would be quite limited. The relic firearm shown might be useful at a very close distance, like in a phone booth, but not much beyond that. Also, any persons close to the shooter would have heard the shot.
And finally, the physics: Charlie's body was thrown to his right, indicating a shot that came from his left... not directly in front of him.
To go way down a theoretical rabbit hole here, a small weapon containing an exploding bullet (remember, they said they did not find the bullet) and the glasses he was wearing provided some sort of maybe Bluetooth connection to the gun providing a targeting system that whatever his eye looked at could have sent micro adjustments to the weapon that had the barrel on some sort of micro gimble and with the blink of an eye triggered the weapon to go off. Crazy? Far fetched? Maybe? But it is absolutely plausible because they have not yet tied a projectile back to the "shooters" gun.There are not many countries that would build something that sophisticated. Maybe a country that designed an exploding pager was involved? Just completely speculating but everything I feel is still on the table.
Even the kids mocking have the impact from right to left. Back to front.
What you do see is a number of people right around the area at the fence or inside that all look... unfazed by the event.
Starting from Charlies 5 o'clock.
5 o'clock : man in black shirt behind Charlie. Then gun in white shirt makes hand gestures.
3 o'clock : 3 people inside fence guy in green shirt looks like gun under arm. Woman in blue and white dress starts recording. Man next to her black and red trump hat. They don't react.
Man and woman don't flinch. Gun in green does a dress right dress sort of thing and puts his weapon away. (It looks that way if you scrub the video slowly back and forth)
12 o'clock : Man in brown shirt. Arms looks like he is an operator. He doesn't flinch with the crowd.
I don't know the whole of what actually happened, but this is certainly nonsense. Yes, the sound of the report does happen as the guy adjusts his sleeve. The thing is that the report arrived after the bullet. Watch when Charlie is hit, a fraction of a second before the sound.
Brown shirt guy was part of Kirk's protection detail, like to two guys on stage with him. Besides his "close in" security, there are other detailees who are in the crowd to identify potential threats before they can act out.
The guy in the brown shirt barely even touches his arm, also he reacts very shocked and surprised when he sees what happened to Charlie. This guy is not the shooter, he was part of Charlie's detail.
Also, I can't understand why everyone is forgetting the video that captures the shooting from far away. Remember that one? This one: https://x.com/AustinConserve/status/1965849466499629447 It was videoed by a student at the top of one of the buildings right next to the one where the shooter probably was. We know this because as soon as the shot goes off, everyone there on that building turns their heads RIGHT, towards the roof where the shooter was. You can't fake a sound like that coming from far away but then have the shot actually be from right next to Charlie. And there's no way on God's green earth anybody can line up sounds like that coming from different directions. Not when everyone there has clearly stated the sound came from that roof.
You all WANT there to be something more to this story, and I get it. I'm positive this was not a "lone shooter" scenario, that Robinson was being goaded on by either tranny activists, CIA, or more. BUT if the CIA can get away with brainwashing a single individual to carry out their will, then they will take that easy path if it means they don't have to really get in the fight. If they ensured that they could get Robinson to do it, then they wouldn't need secret "cellphone guns" to kill Charlie right next to him, when everyone was looking directly at him.
Also, in the video, you can CLEARLY see that Charlie's body gets hit from the front of his chest/body mass as there is a ripple that goes out from the center of his shirt, and his body is pushed back into his chair. Yes, he does lean over to his left side (our right side when watching), but maybe that's because...his neck was shot on his left side and his body is naturally leaning in that direction.
Sorry guys, but I'm just not buying these theories that Charlie was shot by some secret gun behind him, or by tiny laser beams from a guy's sleeve. It's crap like this that makes our movement look insane to regular people.
The green shirt guy is the standing in an odd position facing to the side. Could that be because of sun? I don't know but it's odd. Did they recover the bullet?
Hummm, the more you look at.. very strange wound thou, more like exit than entrance. Timing is something else, like perfect.. But, we are looking down the barrel. and from shooting .22's... the shorter barrel, they really breath fire! and 1.5 is really short.. ?
Zero recoil. Physics doesn't work like that.
brother, that man was adjusting his shirt sleeve. these low resolution videos are fueling the confusion. high resolution videos exist and anyone citing a low resolution, blurry, video for ants is selling something
The text in the link says it's a "tiny 1.5-inch barrel." If so, the accuracy would be quite limited. The relic firearm shown might be useful at a very close distance, like in a phone booth, but not much beyond that. Also, any persons close to the shooter would have heard the shot.
And finally, the physics: Charlie's body was thrown to his right, indicating a shot that came from his left... not directly in front of him.
To go way down a theoretical rabbit hole here, a small weapon containing an exploding bullet (remember, they said they did not find the bullet) and the glasses he was wearing provided some sort of maybe Bluetooth connection to the gun providing a targeting system that whatever his eye looked at could have sent micro adjustments to the weapon that had the barrel on some sort of micro gimble and with the blink of an eye triggered the weapon to go off. Crazy? Far fetched? Maybe? But it is absolutely plausible because they have not yet tied a projectile back to the "shooters" gun.There are not many countries that would build something that sophisticated. Maybe a country that designed an exploding pager was involved? Just completely speculating but everything I feel is still on the table.
Think of the CIAs heart attack weapon. Cutting edge technology back in the day in clandestine spy vs spy operations….
Yeah those exploding pager guys... Hmmm
LOL I am sorry but one day you will look back on this post and say no there is no way I could write something so idiotic.
But you were right about the pagers I thought that was genius.
Playing devil's advocate here. I don't think the brown shirt guy killed him. But the exploding pager making people I DO feel were responsible.
Even the kids mocking have the impact from right to left. Back to front.
What you do see is a number of people right around the area at the fence or inside that all look... unfazed by the event.
Starting from Charlies 5 o'clock.
5 o'clock : man in black shirt behind Charlie. Then gun in white shirt makes hand gestures.
3 o'clock : 3 people inside fence guy in green shirt looks like gun under arm. Woman in blue and white dress starts recording. Man next to her black and red trump hat. They don't react.
Man and woman don't flinch. Gun in green does a dress right dress sort of thing and puts his weapon away. (It looks that way if you scrub the video slowly back and forth)
12 o'clock : Man in brown shirt. Arms looks like he is an operator. He doesn't flinch with the crowd.
Camera behind Charlie is removed right after tainting the crime scene.
This one I place close to the bottom of other shooter ideas.
I don't know the whole of what actually happened, but this is certainly nonsense. Yes, the sound of the report does happen as the guy adjusts his sleeve. The thing is that the report arrived after the bullet. Watch when Charlie is hit, a fraction of a second before the sound.
Brown shirt guy was part of Kirk's protection detail, like to two guys on stage with him. Besides his "close in" security, there are other detailees who are in the crowd to identify potential threats before they can act out.
You guys honestly need to stop. He had nothing in his hand. NOTHING.
#1 He sure didn't take long to set up the shot. #2 but that is a very wierd hand movement and absolute alignment with the shot sound.
Very strange indeed.
Yeah no. You are not helping by peddling this garbo.
Interesting. From the day of the assassination, I've been saying that it in no way sounded like a high powered rifle.
The guy in the brown shirt barely even touches his arm, also he reacts very shocked and surprised when he sees what happened to Charlie. This guy is not the shooter, he was part of Charlie's detail.
Also, I can't understand why everyone is forgetting the video that captures the shooting from far away. Remember that one? This one: https://x.com/AustinConserve/status/1965849466499629447 It was videoed by a student at the top of one of the buildings right next to the one where the shooter probably was. We know this because as soon as the shot goes off, everyone there on that building turns their heads RIGHT, towards the roof where the shooter was. You can't fake a sound like that coming from far away but then have the shot actually be from right next to Charlie. And there's no way on God's green earth anybody can line up sounds like that coming from different directions. Not when everyone there has clearly stated the sound came from that roof.
You all WANT there to be something more to this story, and I get it. I'm positive this was not a "lone shooter" scenario, that Robinson was being goaded on by either tranny activists, CIA, or more. BUT if the CIA can get away with brainwashing a single individual to carry out their will, then they will take that easy path if it means they don't have to really get in the fight. If they ensured that they could get Robinson to do it, then they wouldn't need secret "cellphone guns" to kill Charlie right next to him, when everyone was looking directly at him.
Also, in the video, you can CLEARLY see that Charlie's body gets hit from the front of his chest/body mass as there is a ripple that goes out from the center of his shirt, and his body is pushed back into his chair. Yes, he does lean over to his left side (our right side when watching), but maybe that's because...his neck was shot on his left side and his body is naturally leaning in that direction.
Sorry guys, but I'm just not buying these theories that Charlie was shot by some secret gun behind him, or by tiny laser beams from a guy's sleeve. It's crap like this that makes our movement look insane to regular people.
Rant over.
BINGO!!!
The green shirt guy is the standing in an odd position facing to the side. Could that be because of sun? I don't know but it's odd. Did they recover the bullet?
Just stop it.
Hummm, the more you look at.. very strange wound thou, more like exit than entrance. Timing is something else, like perfect.. But, we are looking down the barrel. and from shooting .22's... the shorter barrel, they really breath fire! and 1.5 is really short.. ?
Last thing he said was ''violence''