Charlie was wearing a necklace. There is no evidence he was wearing bullet proof vest and why would he have needed to wear one? Previous to this he was never considered a likely target for an assassination.
This killing surprised everyone but the people that planned it.
Instead of trying to put a bullet proof vest on him let's first answer why there was a guy to his right that looked like he was firing a gun straight at Charlie the second the gunshot we are told came from Tyler Robinson rang out.
Erika Kirk gave an interview with the NYT and said Charlie never wore a bulletproof vest. I think she would know.
oh? You got a link because earlier today someone claimed that she said he wouldnt do an event without one.
72 hour rule might not work in this case. Hopefully it's not the 72 year rule
can you link that plz?
Necklace......goto 2:51
https://rumble.com/v6z5jjg-the-charlie-kirk-assassination-hoax-full-breakdown.html
This is even easier -- the exact same photo, but in high-res: https://imgur.com/a/5NkE2Ag
I never trust really low-res images...
Ok thx, will delete
What is this? (in the picture)
His necklace
Charlie was wearing a necklace. There is no evidence he was wearing bullet proof vest and why would he have needed to wear one? Previous to this he was never considered a likely target for an assassination.
This killing surprised everyone but the people that planned it.
Instead of trying to put a bullet proof vest on him let's first answer why there was a guy to his right that looked like he was firing a gun straight at Charlie the second the gunshot we are told came from Tyler Robinson rang out.
Dude. A necklace.