Doubtful.
Only because there was a car lot in town back in the 90s that sold lemon cars — cars that run well and check out initially but later develop issues. You know, a car that runs well and checks out until a month later. Anyways, the owner sold the company right before the lemon law was passed in my state. A few people were still able to take the original owner to court and sue him for selling them a lemon car.
Apples vs Oranges??
Not sure if the orginal owners of Domnion company can be compared to what I just typed, but it makes sense that a company can be held liable after the fact of it being sold seems like good news or maybe Im just too hopeful and light hearted.
I seem to recall that the "dominion" company structure was not very transparent in that there was not just a limited company with shareholders. There were several companies in the chain. I believe that is why some court cases might have failed because they were suing the wrong entity. We might know the machines as Dominion but the error could have been in the software which might not be Dominion, for instance.
Also, limited companies are independent entities. They are not the same as their owners and the directors just work for them. Directors could be liable, though.
Companies can go out of business but someone can create a new one with the same name and shareholders etc but the companies are different.
I feel sure that something may well have been worked out here to benefit somebody somewhere.
This is pretty interesting. Why did they sell? They HAVE to rig! Surely rigged elections are worth billions to them.
They can’t? It’s over?
Does it get the previous owners off the hook for their past events?
Doubtful. Only because there was a car lot in town back in the 90s that sold lemon cars — cars that run well and check out initially but later develop issues. You know, a car that runs well and checks out until a month later. Anyways, the owner sold the company right before the lemon law was passed in my state. A few people were still able to take the original owner to court and sue him for selling them a lemon car.
Apples vs Oranges?? Not sure if the orginal owners of Domnion company can be compared to what I just typed, but it makes sense that a company can be held liable after the fact of it being sold seems like good news or maybe Im just too hopeful and light hearted.
Caveat: I am not an expert in any of this.
I seem to recall that the "dominion" company structure was not very transparent in that there was not just a limited company with shareholders. There were several companies in the chain. I believe that is why some court cases might have failed because they were suing the wrong entity. We might know the machines as Dominion but the error could have been in the software which might not be Dominion, for instance.
Also, limited companies are independent entities. They are not the same as their owners and the directors just work for them. Directors could be liable, though.
Companies can go out of business but someone can create a new one with the same name and shareholders etc but the companies are different.
I feel sure that something may well have been worked out here to benefit somebody somewhere.
My BlackBerry is not working... 😁😁😁
Hilarious...you could see in the bit about the dongle they were trying to hide the smiles..
LOLS!!!! Thanks for the first bellylaugh of the day!! 😁🤣😂
Nope. But now we have a way to look inside their system.
No.
Perhaps this war with Venezuela is not mainly about drugs.
I think like Twitter they were seized and sold under trumps EOs.