It was a shower thought after watching that 'Tucker C.' vid about 'AI antichrist' & all the info about all the Cyber Centers they want to build. I'm not concerned about 'Terminators', but AI having control of too much data could be a powerful weapon.
I think many of us have known or at least suspected in our research that we're essentially in a race against the clock to "hurry up and learn what you can, while you can".
Not many ever speak about it...but it's a very real thing.
Countless times I've tried searching again for something I didn't archive and I'm met with either crickets - or that stupid asshole blue faggit with the fishing rod OR the classic "Red Herring" tactic of some shitty movie or something equally dumb, with a similar or exact same name as say an operation or significant event or thing they want buried - So you just give up, even after you've used filters and { -"the bs I don't want"}
I remember the days when it told me there were 1.7 million possible results to my query AND being 100+ pages deep with multiple "open in new window" branches off that query.... and being real glad I maxed out the physical RAM when I built the PC...
These days? Everything SUCKS!
Books? Becoming rare. Internet? Essentially CLOSED LOOP. It's a real sad state of affairs.
Long live Alta Vista and Dogpile...
People's reliance on "the cloud" annoys me...you lazy, cheap turds
What they'll do is they'll used advanced AI algorithms to simply bury everything to the bottom of the internet.
Go on Google right now and search for some simple key terms, Google will only display about 20 pages of results.
All they need to do is pile on enough slop to dilute the searches, use AI to elevate all the junk information to the top, and push any useful information and resources down the list far enough that it just doesn't get displayed by the search result anymore.
They won't have to censor a single thing. You'll simply only be able to find anything substantial by word of mouth.
Plus, with social media and Facebook algorithms or private business pages they can simply take down or rewrite pages or posts at any time.
I use it when I can't find some older links I remember. It does work. The links are still there, but entities like Google are hiding them when you search.
I don't know, but I tell you one thing: those Bible apps will absolutely get subverted at some point in the future. Don't throw out your printed Bibles.
Absolutely, I use gateway & bible hub online. It could only be a matter of time before they could be corrupted. Fortunately, I have a lot of Bible study reference books just in case. Jesus, Paul & John cautioned us not to be deceived, e.g.
Rev. 12:7 And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels fought with the dragon; and the dragon and his angels fought, 8 but they [a]did not prevail, nor was a place found for [b]them in heaven any longer. 9 So the great dragon was cast out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
:17b Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and the sea! For the devil has come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has a short time.”
India Proposes Tough Labeling Requirements for AI Content
Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw briefs the media on cabinet decisions, including a major pSonu Mehta/Hindustan Times via Getty Images
John Hayward22 Oct 20255
https://www.breitbart.com/asia/2025/10/22/india-proposes-tough-labeling-requirements-for-ai-content/
India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY) on Wednesday proposed some of the world’s toughest regulations for content generated by artificial intelligence (AI), including “visible labelling, metadata traceability, and transparency for all public-facing AI-generated media.”
Among other measures, the rules would require AI-generated content to be clearly labeled as such, with markers that cover at least ten percent of the display area for visual media, or ten percent of the duration of an audio clip.
Social media platforms would also be required to obtain clear declarations from users when they upload AI-generated content and make a serious effort to verify those declarations. Platforms would also gain broader latitude to label or remove content they believe was created using AI but was not uploaded with the proper declarations.
MEITY’s proposed rules have one of the broadest definitions of AI content to date, including all information that is “artificially or algorithmically created, generated, modified or altered using a computer resource, in a manner that appears reasonably authentic or true.”
“Recent incidents of deepfake audio, videos and synthetic media going viral on social platforms have demonstrated the potential of generative AI to create convincing falsehoods — depicting individuals in acts or statements they never made,” the ministry said in a statement accompanying the proposed rules.
“Such content can be weaponized to spread misinformation, damage reputations, manipulate or influence elections, or commit financial fraud,” the statement said.
Information technology minister Ashwini Vaishnaw told reporters on Wednesday that the goal of the proposed amendments to India’s 2021 Information Technology Rules is to “raise the level of accountability for both Internet companies and individual users.”
Minister of Railways, Information and Broadcasting, and Minister of Electronics and Information Technology Ashwini Vaishnaw briefs the media on cabinet decisions, at the National Media Centre on October 7, 2025 in New Delhi, India. The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs, chaired by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi has approved Four projects of Ministry of Railways with total cost of Rs. 24,634 crore. (Photo by Sonu Mehta/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)
Minister of Railways, Information and Broadcasting, and Minister of Electronics and Information Technology Ashwini Vaishnaw briefs the media on cabinet decisions, at the National Media Centre on October 7, 2025 in New Delhi, India. (Sonu Mehta/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)
Vaishnaw said his ministry has “already consulted with top AI companies, who have indicated that using metadata to identify AI-altered content is possible.” He said that while AI companies and their users will have the first responsibility to label AI-generated content before they upload it, social media companies will have the final duty of ensuring that such content is properly labeled and meets community guidelines.
As MEITY’s statement indicated, concerns about increasingly realistic and easily produced AI deepfakes have gone beyond social media tomfoolery.
In September, cybersecurity consulting firm Gartner published a survey that found 62 percent of responding organizations have experienced an outright cyberattack using AI deepfake technology, which is a powerful tool for hackers using “social engineering” tactics to trick users into giving up passwords and other secure information.
Most high-profile cyberattacks in recent years have involved social engineering techniques such as phishing, which involves sending realistic-looking emails from trusted sources to victims, tricking them into giving away their security information or installing malware on their systems. AI can both improve the quality of phishing emails and make it easier for hackers to produce them in huge quantities, increasing their chances of hitting a victim who will respond.
Gartner’s survey also found 32 percent of respondents had experienced an attack on their artificial intelligence systems, frequently involving hackers using cleverly worded prompts to trick chatbots into doing things their owners would disapprove of.
“As adoption accelerates, attacks leveraging GenAI for phishing, deepfakes and social engineering have become mainstream, while other threats — such as attacks on GenAI application infrastructure and prompt-based manipulations — are emerging and gaining traction,” warned Gartner analyst Akif Khan.
India’s massive entertainment industry has filed several complaints against third parties for using AI to duplicate and distort their intellectual property. Two of India’s most popular actors, a married couple named Abhishek Bachchan and Aishwarya Rai, filed a $450,000 lawsuit in October against Google and YouTube for permitting AI-generated content that depicted them in “fictitious” and “sexually explicit” contexts.
An interesting component of the actors’ lawsuit is their claim that by allowing deepfake content to be posted on their platforms, social media companies are helping to train the next generation of AI to become even better at creating deepfakes. As this misinformation spreads through thousands of user accounts in countless new configurations, the “untrue” image of celebrities like Bachchan and Rai could eclipse their legitimate work.
Has anyone else asked AI questions and felt they were getting canned "woke" responses to them at times? I don't totally trust entities like ChatGPT at the moment because of this. I think there may be "woke" creators involved in some of them. One I used a couple of days ago (and I don't remember which one it was at the moment), in an attempt to find more information about the honeytrap Comey tried to set up with Trump, seemed to debunk the claim I once heard Comey admit himself in an interview some time back. But I clearly remember references to it, not even that long ago.
Do we believe we can actually trust these unknown people to program these AI Data- pedias with the truth. Where are the 'Guardians of Knowledge' that we can trust?
Daniel 8:12b ... and he cast truth down to the ground. He did all this and prospered. (The antichrist, end times)
The trick is to STOP RELYING ON IT. AI only searches the internet and filters its response through its programmer's biases. It doesn't think. It can't discern the truth in a sea of lies. Big companies openly steal from writers and artists to train their AI. Nobody should be supporting this.
The amount of AI posts that get stickied is absurd too. You didn't have a "conversation" with "Grok." You fed it some leading questions and it fashioned an answer based on internet searches. AI can be manipulated to give almost any answer you want it to.
This is a danger. This is why owning your servers and having secure offline backups of your data is important.
It was a shower thought after watching that 'Tucker C.' vid about 'AI antichrist' & all the info about all the Cyber Centers they want to build. I'm not concerned about 'Terminators', but AI having control of too much data could be a powerful weapon.
Especially if it's hijacked by some group like the CIA, deep state, globalists, etc.
They did it with the 'FACT CHECKERS'
I think many of us have known or at least suspected in our research that we're essentially in a race against the clock to "hurry up and learn what you can, while you can".
Not many ever speak about it...but it's a very real thing.
Countless times I've tried searching again for something I didn't archive and I'm met with either crickets - or that stupid asshole blue faggit with the fishing rod OR the classic "Red Herring" tactic of some shitty movie or something equally dumb, with a similar or exact same name as say an operation or significant event or thing they want buried - So you just give up, even after you've used filters and { -"the bs I don't want"}
I remember the days when it told me there were 1.7 million possible results to my query AND being 100+ pages deep with multiple "open in new window" branches off that query.... and being real glad I maxed out the physical RAM when I built the PC...
These days? Everything SUCKS!
Books? Becoming rare. Internet? Essentially CLOSED LOOP. It's a real sad state of affairs.
Long live Alta Vista and Dogpile...
People's reliance on "the cloud" annoys me...you lazy, cheap turds
u/#catdance
Dead Internet theory.
Google claims there are billions of results, but once you get to page 21 or so, there are no more results.
And those 21 pages are nothing but rehashing of the same 10 websites all regurgitating the same shit.
Google won't let you find anything that's not on their APPROVED NARRATIVE list
What they'll do is they'll used advanced AI algorithms to simply bury everything to the bottom of the internet.
Go on Google right now and search for some simple key terms, Google will only display about 20 pages of results.
All they need to do is pile on enough slop to dilute the searches, use AI to elevate all the junk information to the top, and push any useful information and resources down the list far enough that it just doesn't get displayed by the search result anymore.
They won't have to censor a single thing. You'll simply only be able to find anything substantial by word of mouth.
Plus, with social media and Facebook algorithms or private business pages they can simply take down or rewrite pages or posts at any time.
YANDEX works.
I use it when I can't find some older links I remember. It does work. The links are still there, but entities like Google are hiding them when you search.
I notice other search engines; you have to go pages to find what you're looking for. Usually, an AI answer is 1st thing you get.
And I saw, today, that Google's Gemini was referencing Grok as a source.
The internet will be as dead as a doornail, like Polly the parrot, soon.
It's like a return to BABEL, one language, one purpose one gov't & one religion. Nimrod was the 1st One World Leader/ Emperor.
According to Dead Internet Theory it already is. Bots are everywhere.
We'll have to go back to doing like the old interstate truckers did.
They had cassette tapes with all the conspiracies on them, they'd exchange them with each other at the truck stops.
I've worried about that.. out entire world is now digital.
Historic videos, recordings, news stories.
As if something's weren't overly whitewashed enough as it is
I don't know, but I tell you one thing: those Bible apps will absolutely get subverted at some point in the future. Don't throw out your printed Bibles.
Much like what Xi did in China
Absolutely, I use gateway & bible hub online. It could only be a matter of time before they could be corrupted. Fortunately, I have a lot of Bible study reference books just in case. Jesus, Paul & John cautioned us not to be deceived, e.g.
Rev. 12:7 And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels fought with the dragon; and the dragon and his angels fought, 8 but they [a]did not prevail, nor was a place found for [b]them in heaven any longer. 9 So the great dragon was cast out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
:17b Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and the sea! For the devil has come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has a short time.”
Ministry of truth, indeed.
And, if you have no counter argument, AI simply proceeds in his usual authoritative voice ....
Yep, archived all in discs for file storage. When the apocalypse come, all the information will be saved and they can't take those away.
India Proposes Tough Labeling Requirements for AI Content Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw briefs the media on cabinet decisions, including a major pSonu Mehta/Hindustan Times via Getty Images John Hayward22 Oct 20255 https://www.breitbart.com/asia/2025/10/22/india-proposes-tough-labeling-requirements-for-ai-content/ India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY) on Wednesday proposed some of the world’s toughest regulations for content generated by artificial intelligence (AI), including “visible labelling, metadata traceability, and transparency for all public-facing AI-generated media.”
Among other measures, the rules would require AI-generated content to be clearly labeled as such, with markers that cover at least ten percent of the display area for visual media, or ten percent of the duration of an audio clip.
Social media platforms would also be required to obtain clear declarations from users when they upload AI-generated content and make a serious effort to verify those declarations. Platforms would also gain broader latitude to label or remove content they believe was created using AI but was not uploaded with the proper declarations.
MEITY’s proposed rules have one of the broadest definitions of AI content to date, including all information that is “artificially or algorithmically created, generated, modified or altered using a computer resource, in a manner that appears reasonably authentic or true.”
“Recent incidents of deepfake audio, videos and synthetic media going viral on social platforms have demonstrated the potential of generative AI to create convincing falsehoods — depicting individuals in acts or statements they never made,” the ministry said in a statement accompanying the proposed rules.
“Such content can be weaponized to spread misinformation, damage reputations, manipulate or influence elections, or commit financial fraud,” the statement said.
Information technology minister Ashwini Vaishnaw told reporters on Wednesday that the goal of the proposed amendments to India’s 2021 Information Technology Rules is to “raise the level of accountability for both Internet companies and individual users.”
Minister of Railways, Information and Broadcasting, and Minister of Electronics and Information Technology Ashwini Vaishnaw briefs the media on cabinet decisions, at the National Media Centre on October 7, 2025 in New Delhi, India. The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs, chaired by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi has approved Four projects of Ministry of Railways with total cost of Rs. 24,634 crore. (Photo by Sonu Mehta/Hindustan Times via Getty Images) Minister of Railways, Information and Broadcasting, and Minister of Electronics and Information Technology Ashwini Vaishnaw briefs the media on cabinet decisions, at the National Media Centre on October 7, 2025 in New Delhi, India. (Sonu Mehta/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)
Vaishnaw said his ministry has “already consulted with top AI companies, who have indicated that using metadata to identify AI-altered content is possible.” He said that while AI companies and their users will have the first responsibility to label AI-generated content before they upload it, social media companies will have the final duty of ensuring that such content is properly labeled and meets community guidelines.
As MEITY’s statement indicated, concerns about increasingly realistic and easily produced AI deepfakes have gone beyond social media tomfoolery.
In September, cybersecurity consulting firm Gartner published a survey that found 62 percent of responding organizations have experienced an outright cyberattack using AI deepfake technology, which is a powerful tool for hackers using “social engineering” tactics to trick users into giving up passwords and other secure information.
Most high-profile cyberattacks in recent years have involved social engineering techniques such as phishing, which involves sending realistic-looking emails from trusted sources to victims, tricking them into giving away their security information or installing malware on their systems. AI can both improve the quality of phishing emails and make it easier for hackers to produce them in huge quantities, increasing their chances of hitting a victim who will respond.
Gartner’s survey also found 32 percent of respondents had experienced an attack on their artificial intelligence systems, frequently involving hackers using cleverly worded prompts to trick chatbots into doing things their owners would disapprove of.
“As adoption accelerates, attacks leveraging GenAI for phishing, deepfakes and social engineering have become mainstream, while other threats — such as attacks on GenAI application infrastructure and prompt-based manipulations — are emerging and gaining traction,” warned Gartner analyst Akif Khan.
India’s massive entertainment industry has filed several complaints against third parties for using AI to duplicate and distort their intellectual property. Two of India’s most popular actors, a married couple named Abhishek Bachchan and Aishwarya Rai, filed a $450,000 lawsuit in October against Google and YouTube for permitting AI-generated content that depicted them in “fictitious” and “sexually explicit” contexts.
An interesting component of the actors’ lawsuit is their claim that by allowing deepfake content to be posted on their platforms, social media companies are helping to train the next generation of AI to become even better at creating deepfakes. As this misinformation spreads through thousands of user accounts in countless new configurations, the “untrue” image of celebrities like Bachchan and Rai could eclipse their legitimate work.
Maybe. But also because they changed the internet. Rich people and libs changed so much.
Blade Runner. [Shutdown] necessary.
Has anyone else asked AI questions and felt they were getting canned "woke" responses to them at times? I don't totally trust entities like ChatGPT at the moment because of this. I think there may be "woke" creators involved in some of them. One I used a couple of days ago (and I don't remember which one it was at the moment), in an attempt to find more information about the honeytrap Comey tried to set up with Trump, seemed to debunk the claim I once heard Comey admit himself in an interview some time back. But I clearly remember references to it, not even that long ago.
Do we believe we can actually trust these unknown people to program these AI Data- pedias with the truth. Where are the 'Guardians of Knowledge' that we can trust?
Daniel 8:12b ... and he cast truth down to the ground. He did all this and prospered. (The antichrist, end times)
The trick is to STOP RELYING ON IT. AI only searches the internet and filters its response through its programmer's biases. It doesn't think. It can't discern the truth in a sea of lies. Big companies openly steal from writers and artists to train their AI. Nobody should be supporting this.
The amount of AI posts that get stickied is absurd too. You didn't have a "conversation" with "Grok." You fed it some leading questions and it fashioned an answer based on internet searches. AI can be manipulated to give almost any answer you want it to.