Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

38
Candace Owens now says that Trump betrayed Charlie Kirk... (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 243 days ago by valley-lily 243 days ago by valley-lily +38 / -0
49 comments download share
49 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (49)
sorted by:
▲ 34 ▼
– valley-lily [S] 34 points 243 days ago +34 / -0

Sorry guys but I can't take her seriously anymore. I know I'm in the minority in this regard on this board, but this is utterly ridiculous.

Either she brings receipts for Trump calling out a hit on Charlie, or that's it. I'm done. I cannot believe that, in any timeline, Trump would want Charlie Kirk, one of his biggest supporters and one of the biggest reasons why the youth of this country has swung further right, to be assassinated in one of the most horrific ways possible. This is absolutely NOT what Trump or the White Hats would do, this is beyond the pale.

And her having a "dream" where Charlie told her he was betrayed? SIGH

Not all dreams are from God or are good.

Jeremiah 23:32: "Behold, I am against those who prophesy lying dreams, declares the Lord, and who tell them and lead my people astray by their lies and their recklessness, when I did not send them or charge them. So they do not profit this people at all, declares the Lord."

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– GGRockz 13 points 243 days ago +13 / -0

You are 💯% correct.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– DRan 9 points 243 days ago +9 / -0

Vice President JD Vance said Kirk’s influence continued past the inauguration.

“So much of the success we’ve had in this administration traces directly to Charlie’s ability to organize and convene,” Vance said on X late Wednesday. “He didn’t just help us win in 2024, he helped us staff the entire government.”

We all (should've) seen that video by now but here is a random article that has the quote in it. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/how-charlie-kirk-helped-shape-a-conservative-force-for-a-new-generation

Trump wouldn't have had him taken out.

“Some people said he might be President someday. I told him, I said, ‘Charlie, I think you have a good shot someday at being President,’” Trump said at the time.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/10/charlie-kirks-widow-reveals-he-likely-would-have/

That is what got him killed. Connect the dots from there who did it.

Side note: Wasn't she claiming not long ago it was that one Mideast country that did it? I can't seem to remember the name of that country right now. /s Now she is saying Trump called a hit on him? The dots are forming a solid line. Me thinks anyway.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– eagledriver 4 points 242 days ago +4 / -0

valley_lily...NO YOU ARE NOT!!!!! I have ALWAYS had a gut feeling about this human being and everything she has done has made her either rich or enlivened in the annals of the Repubs...she is dirtier than a "condom that has been worn for 8 weeks."...

Apologize for the analogy but she is one VERY DISGUSTING HUMAN BEING!!!!!!

'Nough Said!!!!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– TV17Q 14 points 243 days ago +14 / -0

I shut her off years ago. Toxic.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Seret 9 points 243 days ago +9 / -0

I stopped giving her much care when she decided to insert herself into Steven Crowder's divorce. I haven't been impressed by what I've seen of her ever since,

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– valley-lily [S] 8 points 243 days ago +8 / -0

I did like her in the past, it was nice to see former black leftists have a change of mind and heart, but these past couple of years have been insane. She says she was best friends with Charlie, but if that was the case why did she refuse to go to his funeral? The one time it would be appropriate to show her support for him? She's grifting like crazy and using Charlie's death to throw herself into the spotlight. Demon behavior.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– DRan 8 points 243 days ago +8 / -0

former black leftists have a change of mind and heart

Did she?.....

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– valley-lily [S] 6 points 243 days ago +6 / -0

Well, she seemed to, but now it's clear she's either reverted back or never changed at all.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– DRan 9 points 243 days ago +9 / -0

I vote she never changed but either way, that was my point. And it appears we have a Candace shill in the thread downdooting kek.

I suppose there is always a chance it's some kind of WH psyop for whatever reason, however, I don't trust her given her track record.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– valley-lily [S] 7 points 243 days ago +7 / -0

Yeah I was wondering about the downvotes, lol. Some people love a crazy no matter what.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Zromrlhzrd 13 points 243 days ago +13 / -0

Candace is clearly no longer stable and I wish her well. CHARLIE KIRK CHOSE HIS OWN PATH!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Westiemom3 12 points 243 days ago +12 / -0

This chick has lost it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– GGRockz 10 points 243 days ago +10 / -0

I saw this.

Trump was close to Charlie Kirk.

Trump himself was shot at but by the Grace of God was saved.

There is no way she is correct on this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Icantdothis2 4 points 242 days ago +4 / -0

I dont think she meant it that way at all.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– GGRockz 4 points 242 days ago +4 / -0

Then what did she mean?

She has been going after Trump for a while now.

This is not the first time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Icantdothis2 4 points 242 days ago +4 / -0

She meant that Trump, who allegedly loved Charlie so much, and after Charlie worked so hard to get him re-elected, has just moved on from watching his live assassination in front of the world. She feels like he's not trying to find out what really happened, and hes letting the FBI cover up the truth. People think they can name a street after Charlie or make some donations and its all good. Its not, and millions of people agree with her. She wants the truth.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GGRockz 2 points 242 days ago +2 / -0

That is your opinion.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Stormeyworld13 2 points 242 days ago +2 / -0

But she did say or implied that President Trump sent to kill Charlie.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Icantdothis2 2 points 242 days ago +2 / -0

I don't believe she did. People also say she said Israel killed Charlie. Those words have never come out of her mouth.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– standwithuQ 9 points 243 days ago +9 / -0

She feels Trump failed him because the story of the killer is so obviously fake and he's willing to just move on. I believe the entire thing was staged.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– valley-lily [S] 7 points 243 days ago +7 / -0

Charlie's death was staged? Oh sure, like how Trump's assassination attempt was staged, right? Get freaking real.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– MAGASamson 8 points 243 days ago +8 / -0

I'm done. I've held my peace and kept patience; however, this is a bridge too far.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– DivergentSequel 8 points 243 days ago +8 / -0

Wow. Did you all watch the video? She did not say Trump sent the hit on Charlie. She did however imply that Trump knows something. You guys really believe Trump does NOT know what happened?

You may not like her, but you cannot discredit her outright for things she did not say. Time will tell what the truth is, period.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– valley-lily [S] 4 points 243 days ago +4 / -0

She definitely implied that Trump had something to do with it, and that he betrayed Charlie. At this point she thinks everyone betrayed him except herself. Self-aggrandizing at its finest.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– DivergentSequel 4 points 243 days ago +4 / -0

Maybe you should correct your initial statement then. Like I said:

"She did not say Trump sent the hit on Charlie." and "You may not like her, but you cannot discredit her outright for things she did not say."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– valley-lily [S] 3 points 242 days ago +3 / -0

To quote TrueAnon:

"As soon as they give you a boulevard and a holiday, they definitely have killed you. That is no question. They killed you,” she said. “That’s their signature thing. That’s what they do. It’s the fed signature." Trump gave him the National day of remembrance, so yes, she's saying he had him killed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DivergentSequel 1 point 242 days ago +1 / -0

I think you're conflating two things.

She said it herself. I'll use your quotes: "As soon as **they give you a boulevard and a holiday, **they definitely have killed you." " That’s what **they do. It’s the **fed signature."

Trump is a him, not a they. Trump is the President, not a fed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Icantdothis2 3 points 242 days ago +3 / -0

You must have a comprehension problem. She did not imply Trump had something to do with it. She's talking about how he's just moved on from a public assassination of the guy who got him elected in 2024 and whom he allegedly really cared about.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– valley-lily [S] 2 points 242 days ago +2 / -0

So we're just going straight to insults. Good to know you're taking this seriously.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DivergentSequel 3 points 242 days ago +3 / -0

Looks like Icantdothis2 was making an observation. That is different from an insult. Perhaps you may be holding negative feelings for Candace and it's clouding your ability?

Other users are having the same problem. Leave emotion out of it and you can discern the truth a lot easier.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– valley-lily [S] 1 point 240 days ago +1 / -0

Nope, I really didn't have an opinion on Candace much before this, but this is just crazy behavior from her. Can't condone it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 243 days ago +6 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– MechanicalNecro 6 points 243 days ago +6 / -0

Yikes. I wonder where she got this info from, because right now she's looking like a useful idiot.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– valley-lily [S] 5 points 243 days ago +5 / -0

From nowhere or from the bottom of a whiskey glass.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TaQo 5 points 243 days ago +5 / -0

I see Candice and her show as fodder.

Just a "heat sink" to cool people addicted to craic, scuttlebutt and gossip.

But hey - that's just my take. You don't have to agree.

This latest "off the rails" stunt is in line with the rest if her kayfabe skit AND she "took a break" recently - most likely - because her "organization" had to make adjustments to her script.

She's now playing the role of "cray cray black chick" and now everyone is going to pile on her, calling out the macron ding-dong thing, tpusa and now this. See? I TOLD YOU she was crazy or something to that effect. We've all seen this plenty of times before. It's a classic drama. Only the names change.

Now she'll take the heat from BOTH sides of the fence. Conservatives AND terrorists.

What's the effect that was created by her saying this? Division.

You should at this point SEE it clearly. Do you? Hello? Don't be so gullible, McFly

You should know by now, you don't just get hundreds of thousands or millions of viewers without the backing of "certain players".

They steered her where they wanted her to go. It's ALL drama...

I'll leave it there...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DivergentSequel 2 points 242 days ago +2 / -0

"macron ding-dong thing" -- favorite thing I read on the internet today! Kek

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TaQo 2 points 242 days ago +2 / -0

Once I was climbing the garden wall

I slipped and had a terrible fall

I fell so hard I heard bells ring

But held on to my ding-a-ling-a-ling

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– robistro 5 points 243 days ago +5 / -0

never watched her once.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– TexasPatriot_40 4 points 243 days ago +4 / -0

She is a nut.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– lukelog925 4 points 243 days ago +4 / -0

She's the only one that I've seen openly question the narrative of Israel being our greatest ally.

If her perspective is Trump betrayed Charlie because Trump hasn't made public the Kharzarian Mafia(KM) publically, then she's just as guilty as any of us being impatient since the 2020 election.

I don't know if she's an anon, but we don't known what the DS has on her, but she comes across as someone delaying coming out and blaming Israel (KM) for 9/11, etc.

For her and her families safety. If the KM, DS, can take out Charlie, they can take out Candace.

Saving Israel for last.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Corker56 4 points 243 days ago +4 / -0

Candace is one of the few asking some very uncomfortable questions. I'm going to ride with her a little longer and see where this goes. Hopefully, she'll be back soon.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MW_Freedom 3 points 243 days ago +3 / -0

buzzardsandbees

https://www.buzzardsandbees.com/

Edit: to whoever upvoted this comment you give me hope. It means you actually watch the entire long form of Candace's videos, and you understand why the link in my comment is important. Too many emotional reactions masquerading as informed.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TrueAnon 3 points 242 days ago +3 / -0

"As soon as they give you a boulevard and a holiday, they definitely have killed you. That is no question. They killed you,” she said. “That’s their signature thing. That’s what they do. It’s the fed signature."

Trump gave him the National day of remembrance, so yes, she's saying he had him killed.

Candace Owens is full of tee total BS! There are plenty of shills here that push her crap.

I have a simple test for "so-called" reporters and journalists. Do they stand by Trump? I voted for him, not them. I knew she was a self aggrandising idiot when she first interviewed Trump at the White House.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Icantdothis2 3 points 242 days ago +3 / -0

Thats not what she said, but, ok.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– baloneyman 3 points 243 days ago +3 / -0

Postpartum depression. She used to be great many years ago...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Debutante 2 points 243 days ago +2 / -0

She seems extremely upset by the death of her friend. I suspect she had deeper feelings for him than she is willing to admit and as a result is spiraling.

The fact that she did not attend Mr. Kirk's funeral is very telling. I, too, do not attend funerals of people I deeply love. I can't bear to see them dead. I prefer to have my memories of them as they were in life. So yes -- I'm betting Ms.Owens was deeply emotionally invested in Mr. Kirk. So I'm cutting her some slack in these wild theories she's coming up with in her grief.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 1Qbank 1 point 243 days ago +1 / -0

With this picture and the story line I can't help thinking is this a secret Opra daughter?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 243 days ago +3 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy