I sooooooooooooooooooooooo love Stephen Miller. In the first Trump admin, he was more of a hidden genius working in the background, but this time around POTUS has put him out there front and center. In some ways, I wish he were still a secret weapon so that he didn't get a a big target put on his chest.
But on the up-side, he's such a fantastic messenger and so awesome at laying out complex concepts so that everyone can understand them and see the common sense behind their approach to addressing/solving those issues.
"If officials cross that line into obstruction, into criminal conspiracy against the United States or against ICE officers, then they will face JUSTICE.”
Touch an ICE officer and get put in PRISON. 🔥
@StephenM"
ICE (with immunity) arrests foreign born judge without an oath (but theoretically with absolute immunity for NOT following the Constitution), who wins? The one engaged in "official acts", but DHS and ICE are both unconstitutional unless they are secretly part of or hired by DoW to secure the border (or deputized as US Marshals) with Article IV, Section 4 authority.
ANSWER: Neither publicly are engaged in "official acts" and both are subject to individual liability (without immunity) for violation of the Constitution per SCOTUS decision 7-1-2024. Further ruling on both likely needed.
Agreed. "Article III constitutional clarification" is what I meant. Specifically, SCOTUS set "official acts" as the bar for immunity for all of Executive Branch (Art II, 7-1-24), but did not define it. They likely will explicitly define it as "all acts in compliance with Article II of the Constitution", making 90% of gov't actions null and void (individuals are liable with zero immunity for unofficial acts), reinforcing removal of admin courts (6-27-24) and admin rules (6-28-24).
Immunity challenges are needed across the board. It could start with ICE. See 7-1-24 SCOTUS ruling that said "official acts only" get immunity. Official=Constitutional? If so, then judges without oaths or making rulings in violation of Const (using admin rules to intentionally subvert) auto-strips them of immunity. Trump v US (7-1-24): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf
Note that this applies to WHOLE Executive Branch. States, counties are all MUNICIPAL SERVICE CORPs owned by Teasury Dept, so it covers all officials down to the County Corp Treasurers engaged in fraud and money laundering with property taxes.
"Immunity from the Const" after swearing an oath to uphold it is the specific judicial issue all the way down to the county level. You might be surprised to learn that most state judges in CA, and nearly all Fed judges appointed by Obama and Biden have no oaths. This is intentional so they cannot be prosecuted for the obvious treason they are all engaged in (to avoid default execution). No oath, yet absolute immunity? Problem.
Easy fix is:
...no oath, then no immunity of any kind because all acts are UNOFFICIAL.
This is an obvious, logical extension of 7-1-24 precedent extended to all three branches.
I sooooooooooooooooooooooo love Stephen Miller. In the first Trump admin, he was more of a hidden genius working in the background, but this time around POTUS has put him out there front and center. In some ways, I wish he were still a secret weapon so that he didn't get a a big target put on his chest.
But on the up-side, he's such a fantastic messenger and so awesome at laying out complex concepts so that everyone can understand them and see the common sense behind their approach to addressing/solving those issues.
"If officials cross that line into obstruction, into criminal conspiracy against the United States or against ICE officers, then they will face JUSTICE.”
Touch an ICE officer and get put in PRISON. 🔥 @StephenM"
https://nitter.net/EricLDaugh/status/1982137601554518059
and before they go to prison, a knee crushing their larynx on the pavement.
Better to crush their nuts (if they have any)
I see your offer and raise you a “nuts already in their larynx.” Kekkity 😉
Whose Nuts? Not sees nuts!
ICE (with immunity) arrests foreign born judge without an oath (but theoretically with absolute immunity for NOT following the Constitution), who wins? The one engaged in "official acts", but DHS and ICE are both unconstitutional unless they are secretly part of or hired by DoW to secure the border (or deputized as US Marshals) with Article IV, Section 4 authority.
ANSWER: Neither publicly are engaged in "official acts" and both are subject to individual liability (without immunity) for violation of the Constitution per SCOTUS decision 7-1-2024. Further ruling on both likely needed.
Agreed. "Article III constitutional clarification" is what I meant. Specifically, SCOTUS set "official acts" as the bar for immunity for all of Executive Branch (Art II, 7-1-24), but did not define it. They likely will explicitly define it as "all acts in compliance with Article II of the Constitution", making 90% of gov't actions null and void (individuals are liable with zero immunity for unofficial acts), reinforcing removal of admin courts (6-27-24) and admin rules (6-28-24).
Where does one find a real Article III judge?
Soooo does that mean Mayors, Judges, Governors? This is certainly setting a dangerous precedent for the future.
Immunity challenges are needed across the board. It could start with ICE. See 7-1-24 SCOTUS ruling that said "official acts only" get immunity. Official=Constitutional? If so, then judges without oaths or making rulings in violation of Const (using admin rules to intentionally subvert) auto-strips them of immunity. Trump v US (7-1-24): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf
Note that this applies to WHOLE Executive Branch. States, counties are all MUNICIPAL SERVICE CORPs owned by Teasury Dept, so it covers all officials down to the County Corp Treasurers engaged in fraud and money laundering with property taxes.
They've been impeding and interfering and harboring and obstructing, and stating this on the news proudly... for YEARS! FFS arrest all of them
"Immunity from the Const" after swearing an oath to uphold it is the specific judicial issue all the way down to the county level. You might be surprised to learn that most state judges in CA, and nearly all Fed judges appointed by Obama and Biden have no oaths. This is intentional so they cannot be prosecuted for the obvious treason they are all engaged in (to avoid default execution). No oath, yet absolute immunity? Problem.
Easy fix is:
This is an obvious, logical extension of 7-1-24 precedent extended to all three branches.