The signs were all there in the Behavioural Science backed programming language they were using, like 'social distancing' - a literal oxymoron for fucking heavens' sake and still millions swallowed it. Here in the UK, we had an app to help 'stop the spread' called 'Track and Trace' - so the concept of tracking and tracing has now been conditioned into people, in readiness for the exact aims of Digital ID and CBDC which they are currently pushing.
As for the 'impossible notion' of a worldwide conspiracy and how many people would have to be in on it etc. Why not? Why is that not feasible? Everyone everywhere all at once adopted the same phrases, buzzwords and slogans. Anyone who doesn't question how that could happen organically needs a brain scan - to check if they even have one.
As for the 'impossible notion' of a worldwide conspiracy and how many people would have to be in on it etc. Why not? Why is that not feasible?
Exactly. Start with the facts and work backwards.
Years ago I worked with a guy who was a staunch defender of all things status quo. He said, "If the big conspiracy theory was true, there would have to be thousands of people involved. At least. If that was the case they would get caught eventually."
If there really is an international conspiracy attempting global control then that would actually go beyond the scope of any one nations justice system, wouldn't it? Lowly activist judges or even SCOTUS really have no say in how we respond to a cabal acting outside of our borders, now does it? To used their words it's not in their jurisdiction. If it really is a group of thousands attempting global control then it is an empire of a sort, isn't it? It is an enemy state waging war on all of the earth's nations. Every nation has a mechanism in place to deal with these sorts of enemy states now don't they?
It's called the military, isn't it? It is not only in place, it is the duty of every nation to subdue and defeat this monstrous empire of global proportion. It is the duty of every head of state to work with other heads of states to defeat this now isn't it? In fact, it is their highest duty, isn't it? If an enemy empire initiates an act of war against any nation all other duties & activities of that nation are moot compared to protecting it's own sovereignty, isn't it?
Yes there is a conspiracy and it would be foolish to think that those responsible for keeping their respective nations safe have not only realized this & taken action but are already several levels deep in a next level generational war against this, isn't it. Only a fool would think that something like Q doesn't exist. Any individual who stands in the way of this is either knowingly or unknowingly working in cahoots with this terrorist enemy empire & must be dealt with swiftly, accordingly & under the authority of the military. Let's go!
It'll come out about all of them. UK here, I watched the speech live at the time but since I don't have TV, I was unaware of these broadcasts or else I would have sounded the alarm myself. But in a way I guess it's kind of better now, because far more people see the Globalist agenda than then and can amplify the outrage.
Western state broadcasters are the WEF and UN's messengers for the slow walk into Agenda 2030. IF the BBC were to go down, there would no longer be anything standing in the way between the masses and the truth in the UK. They are absolutely shitting their Satanic britches over the prospect of this, and hence the diabolical effort to besmirch Trump with yet more Pavlov's Dogwhistle bullfuck.
Coordination is very obvious. I hope the discovery demanded by Trump against the BBC in his legal demands is resisted because then the fun really starts. They really dont have much longer to postpone any response! November 14th, 5pm EST is the deadline.
wonder why social media is so locked down? still is. I am still banned on everything. those who actually have replies on X and Facebook, unless you physically know who they are, most likely not a real person.
my theory for almost a decade is exactly this.
if I put on Facebook the words. --> one, two, three, four... what are other people who are really actually seeing that I put? Unless I have a physical relationship with someone or see them in person and ask them it is possible Facebook is saying I put --> what it wants me to say....
then it can also use ai to sniff out who is and is not around you so still keep you in the dark.
I am nobody but I am pretty sure this is what happens on the Facebook and X.
I do not understand why Trump and others do not bring this aspect to light and demand people in the USA have freedom of speech on social media under their protection--but instead they use what people say against them and they fish for those they want to cause harm to and from.
Even if that doctored recording ad been true, that would hardly have amounted to an "insurrection". Don't give these fucktards an inch, they take enough already.
During Trumps last term I joined a closed Facebook group called The journalist bubble (journalistbubblan) and had some revealing conversations with some fairly known reporters. I was trying to figure out if they were lying or if they actually belived their own bullshit.
My verdict was that they actually belived it. They didn’t question anything coming from the ”right” sources, no matter how stupid it was.
Since then I have completely given up reasoning, facts and logic with these people. You can’t change their opinion until they want to change it themselves.
Swedish people on X are awake, the rest are completely brainwashed. Unlike most countrys there really isn’t a right wing representation in the media.
I have friends boasting about reading 4 morning papers, but they all have the same perspective on everything. And many of the articles come from TT, a news organisation that I used to think were objective and just stating facts, until I noticed the not so subtle propaganda.
These articles are published verbatim in all papers, offering no different perspective no matter how many different morning papers you read.
I grew up with just two channels on TV, and for my generation SVT which is funded by taxpayer money is what they get their news from. Everything is seeded in a leftist view, even ”entertainment”, think Netflix on steroids.
The upside is younger people are not watching, so there is hope.
So they're all working together?
Kinda like they did with covid, cannabis bans, gun bans, taxes on wages, censorship, replacement migration, lgbt, fiat currencies, digital id, etc.
Call me a conspiracy theorist, but me thinks there might be a world wide conspiracy afoot...
The signs were all there in the Behavioural Science backed programming language they were using, like 'social distancing' - a literal oxymoron for fucking heavens' sake and still millions swallowed it. Here in the UK, we had an app to help 'stop the spread' called 'Track and Trace' - so the concept of tracking and tracing has now been conditioned into people, in readiness for the exact aims of Digital ID and CBDC which they are currently pushing.
As for the 'impossible notion' of a worldwide conspiracy and how many people would have to be in on it etc. Why not? Why is that not feasible? Everyone everywhere all at once adopted the same phrases, buzzwords and slogans. Anyone who doesn't question how that could happen organically needs a brain scan - to check if they even have one.
(That doesn't mean you BTW 🫣 👍)
Exactly. Start with the facts and work backwards.
Years ago I worked with a guy who was a staunch defender of all things status quo. He said, "If the big conspiracy theory was true, there would have to be thousands of people involved. At least. If that was the case they would get caught eventually."
His face dropped when I replied, "Yeah. Exactly."
If there really is an international conspiracy attempting global control then that would actually go beyond the scope of any one nations justice system, wouldn't it? Lowly activist judges or even SCOTUS really have no say in how we respond to a cabal acting outside of our borders, now does it? To used their words it's not in their jurisdiction. If it really is a group of thousands attempting global control then it is an empire of a sort, isn't it? It is an enemy state waging war on all of the earth's nations. Every nation has a mechanism in place to deal with these sorts of enemy states now don't they?
It's called the military, isn't it? It is not only in place, it is the duty of every nation to subdue and defeat this monstrous empire of global proportion. It is the duty of every head of state to work with other heads of states to defeat this now isn't it? In fact, it is their highest duty, isn't it? If an enemy empire initiates an act of war against any nation all other duties & activities of that nation are moot compared to protecting it's own sovereignty, isn't it?
Yes there is a conspiracy and it would be foolish to think that those responsible for keeping their respective nations safe have not only realized this & taken action but are already several levels deep in a next level generational war against this, isn't it. Only a fool would think that something like Q doesn't exist. Any individual who stands in the way of this is either knowingly or unknowingly working in cahoots with this terrorist enemy empire & must be dealt with swiftly, accordingly & under the authority of the military. Let's go!
Sue the pants off them
It'll come out about all of them. UK here, I watched the speech live at the time but since I don't have TV, I was unaware of these broadcasts or else I would have sounded the alarm myself. But in a way I guess it's kind of better now, because far more people see the Globalist agenda than then and can amplify the outrage.
Western state broadcasters are the WEF and UN's messengers for the slow walk into Agenda 2030. IF the BBC were to go down, there would no longer be anything standing in the way between the masses and the truth in the UK. They are absolutely shitting their Satanic britches over the prospect of this, and hence the diabolical effort to besmirch Trump with yet more Pavlov's Dogwhistle bullfuck.
State media in Australia also did this.
https://patriots.win/p/1ARK9qoooz/aussie-broadcaster-abc-deceptive/c/
Coordination is very obvious. I hope the discovery demanded by Trump against the BBC in his legal demands is resisted because then the fun really starts. They really dont have much longer to postpone any response! November 14th, 5pm EST is the deadline.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d40OlXw-1Ac
wonder why social media is so locked down? still is. I am still banned on everything. those who actually have replies on X and Facebook, unless you physically know who they are, most likely not a real person.
my theory for almost a decade is exactly this.
if I put on Facebook the words. --> one, two, three, four... what are other people who are really actually seeing that I put? Unless I have a physical relationship with someone or see them in person and ask them it is possible Facebook is saying I put --> what it wants me to say....
then it can also use ai to sniff out who is and is not around you so still keep you in the dark.
I am nobody but I am pretty sure this is what happens on the Facebook and X.
I do not understand why Trump and others do not bring this aspect to light and demand people in the USA have freedom of speech on social media under their protection--but instead they use what people say against them and they fish for those they want to cause harm to and from.
You're not alone, frien.
Even if that doctored recording ad been true, that would hardly have amounted to an "insurrection". Don't give these fucktards an inch, they take enough already.
Sue their asses also.
Now I know why my Swedish relatives think Jan 6 was an insurrection.
LAWSUIT TIME!
Gee. This keeps up, Trump's going to be a rich man...
I bet I know who didn't... Russia.
Sweden gaslighted covid I'm surprised they dropped the ball this time
Hmm... it's almost like a conspiracy.🤔
They may have used the other as a source.
During Trumps last term I joined a closed Facebook group called The journalist bubble (journalistbubblan) and had some revealing conversations with some fairly known reporters. I was trying to figure out if they were lying or if they actually belived their own bullshit.
My verdict was that they actually belived it. They didn’t question anything coming from the ”right” sources, no matter how stupid it was.
Since then I have completely given up reasoning, facts and logic with these people. You can’t change their opinion until they want to change it themselves.
Swedish people on X are awake, the rest are completely brainwashed. Unlike most countrys there really isn’t a right wing representation in the media.
I have friends boasting about reading 4 morning papers, but they all have the same perspective on everything. And many of the articles come from TT, a news organisation that I used to think were objective and just stating facts, until I noticed the not so subtle propaganda.
These articles are published verbatim in all papers, offering no different perspective no matter how many different morning papers you read.
I grew up with just two channels on TV, and for my generation SVT which is funded by taxpayer money is what they get their news from. Everything is seeded in a leftist view, even ”entertainment”, think Netflix on steroids.
The upside is younger people are not watching, so there is hope.
Please sue Canada's CBC
Did the Swedes do their own deceptive editing, or did they just copy the BBC version?
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1989020833738564029?s=20