Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

26
I use to feel exactly the same way as Tucker regarding Gay Attraction. Nobody ever had a reasonable explantion. Until I hear this one. The only one I ever heard that made any sense at all. (in comments) (tuckercarlson.com)
posted 197 days ago by TheHumanPrimer 197 days ago by TheHumanPrimer +26 / -0
33 comments share
33 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (33)
sorted by:
▲ 12 ▼
– madmax2 12 points 197 days ago +12 / -0

So many gays were molested early--so why do they then like the same sex as their molesters? Lesbians hate men, but want to look like them. Make it make sense.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– OneMoreTe 1 point 197 days ago +1 / -0

Proof? or speculation?

I guess that automatically implies all heterosexuals were molested by women right....

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Afropick07 9 points 197 days ago +9 / -0

It doesn’t automatically imply that. Heterosexual is normal, it doesn’t need a cause.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– OneMoreTe 1 point 197 days ago +1 / -0

Im pointing out the absurdity that was implied by suggesting almost all homos were somehow victims, on the subject - and sex in general particularly in the animal kingdom it tracks consistently for WHATEVER reason 1.5-2% of studied mammals (and even fruit flies) just have that particular default setting. The more evolved social critters simply task them to help with both gender roles like hunting/nest building since they arn't preoccupied with the mating rituals.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– gobby 1 point 195 days ago +1 / -0

There is no instance of males penetrating another maie.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Taran77 11 points 197 days ago +11 / -0

Lust of the flesh and sin. This is the only reason why

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– IloveDJT2020 8 points 197 days ago +8 / -0

Yep and a disordered inclination to sin due to the fall (Adam and Eve)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– esoptron 6 points 197 days ago +6 / -0

yes.. the works of the flesh. however, don't leave out the influence of the demonic enemy. these demonic influences bring a strong conviction to sin and to increase the depravity beyond the initial temptation. once you start giving in and allowing sin, the depravity worsens. the voices in your head increase, the excuses increase, the anxiety and hostility increase putting you on a negative emotion roller coaster.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– madmax2 11 points 197 days ago +11 / -0

I also can speculate that so many infants get shot up with with a ton of aborted fetal tissue (vaccines) and those vaccines aren't differentiated according to sex.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– TheHumanPrimer [S] 8 points 197 days ago +8 / -0

This requires some set up. Bare with me.

This came from inside a tent in the mountains of Mongolia with their tribe leader. We rode in on horses. White folks aren't allowed to even be there. He was gay. Young man at his side. So, I asked him if it was a problem for the rest of the tribe... being gay and all.

This was his response: The soul chooses the body... not the other way around. Many souls, for whatever reason, have chosen one gender over most of their lifetimes. Then, when they choose the other gender this lifetime (as a change) they might enter into male body but their soul resume is almost all female. That resonance sways things a bit.

Agree or not, it at least provides a viable explanation.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Afropick07 8 points 197 days ago +8 / -0

It’s not viable at all. Just weird excuses.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– BooniesRedneck 7 points 197 days ago +7 / -0

We only live once. [Heb 9:27 NKJV] 27 And as it is appointed for men to die once, but after this the judgment,

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– biblegirl 5 points 196 days ago +5 / -0

Reincarnation is gay, like yourself for posting something this retarded.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TheHumanPrimer [S] 2 points 196 days ago +2 / -0

So the soul is eternal, but God decided the only experience you will have a short 80 year blip in eternity. Yea, that sounds like a great idea for an etennal soul. Gees. Think logically. Think like a God.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– gobby 1 point 195 days ago +1 / -0

How can a person think like a God when they are not a God. It's worse than a man 'thinking' he feels like a woman when he has no idea what it feels like to be a woman.

It seems you have a disagreement about how God is doing things. Maybe you can take it up with Him.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TheHumanPrimer [S] 1 point 195 days ago +1 / -0

I did. He said don't assume he would handle things the way we do. We built a belief system by projecting human attributes on him.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TheHumanPrimer [S] 1 point 194 days ago +1 / -0

What in the hell are you talking about?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– hothousecreekguy 6 points 197 days ago +6 / -0

Hmmm, I still don’t get it, don’t understand it, and at my age most likely never will. But that’s ok as long as they don’t push their beliefs and feelings on me and don’t mind me enjoying cuddle time with my lovely bride. 😊

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– PaleMale 4 points 197 days ago +4 / -0

If we find a gene expression associated with pedophilia, does that mean it is excusable? Should we expect people to not be pedophiles?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– 45ichooseu 4 points 197 days ago +4 / -0

I fucking hate piers. Seems his debate style it to say the MSM line, then deny you from talking, then keep you trapped in circular conversation that is just chaos. It's exhausting and doesn't paint him in a good light. That was fucking unwatchable.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TheHumanPrimer [S] 2 points 196 days ago +2 / -0

Okay, well, there's that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– The_Watcher 3 points 197 days ago +3 / -0

I think people talk a lot of nonsense about homosexuality. People who cannot explain physical attraction still feel entitled to a view when it comes to same sex attraction. How reasonable is that?

If homosexuality were a natural process then surely it would be present in other species that also reproduce sexually? Yes?

OK, so what about dolphins? Homosexual behavior is well-documented in bottlenose dolphins, a species extensively studied for such interactions

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– gobby 4 points 197 days ago +4 / -0

It's common to hear gay apologists claim that all animals show homosexual traits. However, the bottom line (no pun intended) is that there is no incidence of male animals penetrating other male animals.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– The_Watcher 2 points 196 days ago +2 / -0

So you didn't bother to look at the link I provided? It starts:

Same-sex socio-sexual behaviours (SSSB) in animals are interactions between members of the same sex which are ascribed to opposite sex courtship and mating behaviours without reproduction (Bailey & Zuk 2009). These include mounting, genital contact, courting and pair bonding (Bagemihl 1999 cited by Scharf & Martin 2013). There is evidence for SSSB in more than 1500 species across the animal kingdom (Monk et al. 2019). Common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), for example, are known to exhibit homosexual behaviour through tactile interactions; members of the same sex, particularly in males (Silva & Spinelli, 2023), have been recorded mounting one another and stimulating the other’s genitals using a flipper, melon, fluke, or rostrum (Serres et al. 2022).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– gobby 1 point 195 days ago +1 / -0

I did read it. As I said, none penetrate another.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– The_Watcher 1 point 195 days ago +1 / -0

So how would you define "mounting" with relation to "same-sex sexual behavior" in dolphins?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– gobby 1 point 195 days ago +1 / -0

Climbing on top of. That's a lot different than penetrating.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– The_Watcher 1 point 194 days ago +1 / -0

Here is what Brave AI had to say on the matter:

Yes, several non-human male mammals engage in anal penetration of other male animals. This behavior has been documented in various species, primarily among primates and some other mammals.

In Old World primates, male homosexual anal insertion has been recorded in gorillas, orangutans, and several species of macaques, including stumptail, rhesus, and Japanese macaques. This behavior is also observed in some New World primates, such as squirrel monkeys and spider monkeys. Among bonobos, anal intromission between males has been specifically noted. Additionally, male dolphins, including bottlenose dolphins, have been observed engaging in homosexual behavior involving genital rubbing and, in some cases, penis insertion into the anus of another male.

Other species exhibiting this behavior include male American bison, where courtship, mounting, and full anal penetration between males have been documented. Male rams have also been observed performing same-sex mounts with pelvic thrusting and ejaculation, indicating sexual motivation. In some cases, such as with European polecats, exclusive homosexuality with mounting and anal penetration has been observed, though it serves no apparent adaptive function.

These behaviors are often linked to social bonding, dominance establishment, or pleasure rather than reproduction.

Do you have any counter-evidence?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– NewAllOverAgain 1 point 197 days ago +1 / -0

Not true. There are incidences of male animals in effect "raping" other males. Hellbent on sticking their male organ somewhere while acting out sexual aggression on another of their same gender, and so penetrate anally, causing great harm which can result in death of the victim

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– gobby 1 point 195 days ago +1 / -0

Not according to scientists I have seen discuss the issue. There is a tagline that's been thrown around for years, 'over 1500 species....' blah blah blah. No penetration.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– biblegirl 2 points 196 days ago +2 / -0

My gay relative has a secret. It's that I witnessed all of the tangible events that made this person practice homosexuality. My other family member was SO supportive UNTIL I told all of these stories. Now is very concerned.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– gobby 1 point 195 days ago +1 / -0

Can you give some examples of what you believed led to the homosexuality?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Narg 2 points 197 days ago +2 / -0

Both trauma and biology can (on their own) lead to same-sex attraction. As to the biological mechanisms:

The four major types of organizational permutations can yield the obvious forms of cross-sexual gender identities: the presense of malelike brains in female bodies and of female brains in malelike bodies. [This] arises from a simple biological fact. The signals that trigger babies' brains and bodies to take the various possible gender and sex paths are separate.

Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions by Jaak Panksepp, 1998, Page 232 (of 466)

Jaak Panksepp was an interesting psychologist and neuroscientist:

https://grokipedia.com/page/Jaak_Panksepp on Dr. Panksepp:

Born in Tartu, Estonia, he immigrated to the United States as an infant in 1944 and earned a BS in psychology from the University of Pittsburgh in 1965, followed by an MS in 1967 and a PhD in psychobiology/neuroscience from the University of Massachusetts Amherst in 1969, where his dissertation explored the neural basis of aggression.[1][2] Throughout his career, spanning faculty positions at Bowling Green State University from 1972 to 1998 and later at Washington State University from 2006 onward—where he held the Bernice Gilman Baily and Joseph Baily Endowed Chair in Animal Well-Being Science—Panksepp authored over 400 publications, including seminal books like Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions (1998), which has garnered more than 7,000 citations, and The Archaeology of Mind: Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotions (2012, co-authored with Lucy Biven).[3][2]

Panksepp's most enduring contribution was the identification of seven primary emotional command systems in the mammalian brain—SEEKING, CARE, LUST, PLAY, FEAR, RAGE, and SADNESS (or PANIC/GRIEF)—which he posited as evolutionarily conserved circuits driving core affective states and behaviors, with the SEEKING system serving as a central motivator for exploration and reward.[1] His research emphasized the study of emotions in animals, including innovative work on ultrasonic vocalizations in rats to infer positive affective states like joy during play, challenging prevailing views that dismissed animal emotions as anthropomorphic projections unfit for scientific inquiry.[2] This framework not only advanced basic neuroscience but also had profound implications for clinical fields, linking dysregulation of these systems to psychiatric disorders such as depression, anxiety, and addiction, and informing therapeutic approaches in biological psychiatry.[3]

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 7 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy