Intel had a willingness to put in intelligence backdoors
For that they were punished severely by consumers who actually care to be in control of their machines and not spied upon
privacy and security are PARAMOUNT for people using digital currencies. Why the hell would you allow someone elses bank to have unfettered access to your crypto wallet. I'm making an analogy with 'someone elses bank', in the case of the intel hw management features, i'm referring to cia / nsa and usgov
They switched to AMD. So far the best german engineers haven't been able to find backdoors but they are concerned about hw vulnerabilities in the internal secondary cpu (cpu in a cpu) and some of its more opaque functions. I am citing something from years ago, actually, so my knowledge is not current. I could be wrong.
But also, amd surpassed intel by a lot, and now intel is finally starting to catch back up
Normies don't care about Intel's back door. They can barely figure out what to do when an icon moves on their desktop. It's all wrote memorization of workflows.
AMD has taken the lead because their processors offer way more value than Intel's at this moment. Their CPU sockets also have extremely long lives - AM4 is like 9 years old at this point. Intel's sockets last 2 processor generations and then you need a new board to upgrade. Buying AMD is cheaper right now and in the future.
AMD has a backdoor in a similar manner to the "Intel Management Engine" called the PSP. The Intel Management Engine literally renders Epstein obsolete as the state can load up your computer with anything they want at any time and the devil is in the details.
Complete separate operating system (Minix OS) on the zero ring which thanks to intel was the most popular OS in the world at one stage and no one knew they were running it. It is my feeling that consumers did not punish Intel but industry and business may have moved away but like I said, AMD does it too.
Intel had a willingness to put in intelligence backdoors
For that they were punished severely by consumers who actually care to be in control of their machines and not spied upon
privacy and security are PARAMOUNT for people using digital currencies. Why the hell would you allow someone elses bank to have unfettered access to your crypto wallet. I'm making an analogy with 'someone elses bank', in the case of the intel hw management features, i'm referring to cia / nsa and usgov
They switched to AMD. So far the best german engineers haven't been able to find backdoors but they are concerned about hw vulnerabilities in the internal secondary cpu (cpu in a cpu) and some of its more opaque functions. I am citing something from years ago, actually, so my knowledge is not current. I could be wrong.
But also, amd surpassed intel by a lot, and now intel is finally starting to catch back up
Normies don't care about Intel's back door. They can barely figure out what to do when an icon moves on their desktop. It's all wrote memorization of workflows.
AMD has taken the lead because their processors offer way more value than Intel's at this moment. Their CPU sockets also have extremely long lives - AM4 is like 9 years old at this point. Intel's sockets last 2 processor generations and then you need a new board to upgrade. Buying AMD is cheaper right now and in the future.
"Normies don't care about Intel's back door. They can barely figure out what to do when an icon moves on their desktop."
Correct and KEK to boot !!
AMD has a backdoor in a similar manner to the "Intel Management Engine" called the PSP. The Intel Management Engine literally renders Epstein obsolete as the state can load up your computer with anything they want at any time and the devil is in the details.
Complete separate operating system (Minix OS) on the zero ring which thanks to intel was the most popular OS in the world at one stage and no one knew they were running it. It is my feeling that consumers did not punish Intel but industry and business may have moved away but like I said, AMD does it too.