Patrick Byrne Now Claims He was/is a CIA Asset, Worked for John Brennan
December 9, 2025 | Sundance
(theconservativetreehouse.com)
Comments (10)
sorted by:
Previously Patrick Byrne claimed he worked for the FBI in part of the operation to dirty up President Trump in the 2016 election cycle. Accepting Byrne’s claims, not in detail – but rather the big picture, the sketchy part was always why would anyone trust what he says against the background of his admissions of willful association with such an endeavor.
That said, everything around Mr. Byrne was just, well, sketchy; as an outcome anything around the associations of Mr Byrne carried that same sketch. As grandpa always said, “hang around a one-legged friend long enough, and you’re gonna start limping.” Today, Mr Byrne said he has been working for the CIA all along. WATCH (Prompted):
I have no idea if Patrick Byrne is actually working for the CIA; however, if true that admission should only create an even larger FULL STOP warning toward anyone and everything associated. Just walk away from it all, because if there is a factual CIA involvement in the ongoing issues of the team, an interested person is walking into a hall of mirrors.
This is why it's hard to trust anyone at that level. There is a reason people get to that level, and it's because they know how to play the game, they're wheeler dealers, they are perfectly comfortable lying and scheming. They are not trustworthy.
I don't know enough about Byrne, but I know obama hated flynn and the dems set him up as part of their russia russia russia psyops. So the enemy of my enemy.... I trust Flynn. But, I have no angst over any of it because I believe Trump has the right (Q ) team telling him who's on the up and up. He won't be caught off guard imo.
Nah that guy is just a grifter
To me Byrne in the past seemed a bit sketchy, and his demeanor during his presentations always seemed a bit off to me. In this interview his presentation and demeanor seemed to me to be much more relaxed, forthright and honest. That's just my observation for what it's worth. Of note he says Grenell is compromised (Russia has video of him banging an underage boy (age14-15) in Syria). Also says Ratcliffe is compromised having been filmed on two different occasions in DC hotels with two different young females, not underage though.
Every time this guy talks, I roll up my pants.
I thought that was common knowledge. He told us that a long time ago.
An "asset" simply means he was contracted by a government agency to do some kind of work for them within his area of expertice. If I recall properly, he fully described what he did.
This isn't new news to me, at least.
Pretty soon he will have invented the internet, and Gore is taking credit.
I'm just wondering what difference it makes if he was/ is and will forever more be an intelligence asset. Do we accept all of what literally anyone says at this point? Many people legit have inside info on PART of the story. Some of those exploit the nuggets they do have to the max, embellishing truth with clickbait hopium or flat out psy-op level news feed.
It may be wise to just settle into observer mode for now...
... Zuckerberg, Dorsey, etc