Wait. Are you implying that the Patriots organized for Walz to be on the VP ticket?
I think that's a stretch, personally.
However, when an enemy is destroying themselves, the best way to hurt them it to get out of their way.
The corrupt machine of the Democrat faction of the Cabal will do what they are going to do. The Patriots simply have to stand back and let them be them. (While cording off the situation, so that damage to the population is limited.)
So, do you think that they arranged for Kamala to be the Potus candidate? How do you see that being done, concretely speaking?
Do you think that the people running the Dem party are agents of the White Hats, or are they being told what to do by their 'puppet masters' who have in fact been taken over and controlled by WH forces?
Yes, I believe they arranged for Kamala to be the candidate
She was the least likeable candidate of all of them, literally the worst possible option for them, especially after Tulsi destroyed her on stage
Biden maintained Presidency until it was absolutely too late for them to hold another primary election for a true Democratic candidate. This forced their hand to force Kamala front and center
Kamala didn't interview of really campaign the first 40+ days of her becoming the Democratic candidate
If we truly believe in Q, then we must believe:
There is/was a cabal that pulled strings on all major influences: banking, media, industry, entertainment, and politics
Patriots are in control
We are watching a movie
I believe Biden was installed on purpose. I'm not even sure if that truly is the real Joe Biden. I believe Trump knew he was going to lose the 2020 election. I believe this was in part to let the rot be exposed: pharmaceutical, politics, banking, Hollywood, etc.
I believe Biden was a puppet. I believe Kamala is a drunk was the forced into her role. I believe Q chose her as a guarantee she'd lose, as she's absolutely unlikeable.
I believe there are certain heads of the cabal that have been replaced, or lines of communication have been compromised by Q, as to influence certain decisions like Kamala choosing her VP.
Thanks for sharing. I like to hear how you views things.
If we truly believe in Q, then we must believe:
There is/was a cabal that pulled strings on all major influences: banking, media, industry, entertainment, and politics
Patriots are in control
We are watching a movie
No, this is not critical thinking. The assumption you are making here is that your particular interpretation of these points is exactly correct and it is what and why Q dropped these ideas.
'Truly believe in Q'
If you do not understand that Q was a psyop, then you might simply take everything at its face value. But that's not critical thinking and (in my opinion) its the opposite of the kind of thinking the Q op intended to inspire.
For example, what does "patriots in control" mean? Control in what sense? Like a general is 'in control' over all the army units under his command? Or the way that a champion chess player can arrive at a point where he is in control of the game from a game theory viewpoint?
Then, control over [what]?
In what sense are you 'watching a movie'? is it every single thing? Is it a metaphor for the idea that the systems of the world we are observing are essentially a 'game' where people play roles representing one thing, but it is not who they a really are? When a governor says he serves the people of this state, but he's actually executing graft and engaged in corruption that is against the interests of the people, is he not 'an actor'?
I appreciate that you have the particular interpretation that you do, but in my view, it is way, way too simplistic, and not a very effective way of looking at that is going on.
That said, we're all free to think and interpret what we see however we want.
Another example, if Biden was 'installed on purpose', then how. What is the mechanics?
Was the Cabal goaded into a position where they put forth Biden thinking this was their best option? Lured into making that move? Or did George Soros ring the ruling clique in the party up and tell them to make Biden the candidate, because he's actually following orders from someone else?
In a game of chess, grand champions will get to a point when they will just surrender BECAUSE they can see how things will go. Their opponent has them cornered. But less experienced players will play on, not realizing that they have already lost the game, because they don't know the game on the level that the champion does.
In this case, the winning player is 'in control', and can force the opponent to make moves that ultimately undermine themselves, but the opponent is still free and capable of making moves.
The movement started when Trump came down the escalator is a win all scenario. Either they win, or we do. The cabal cannot simply 'give up' and surrender the game, because it is existential; giving up means they are dead, completely. So, they play on, play on, making moves, hoping somehow to get a break, while all the time, the players 'in control' are pushing, luring and leading them into making moves that damage them further.
As far a the movie goes, it should be very, very clear that Trump is playing a character, leading the Cabal elements to think he's foolish, or bafoonish, etc, etc, etc, whereas in fact he's extremely strategic. He constantly taunts the MSM and the rabid Dems into places where they shoot themselves in the feet. Is he not 'playing a role'?
These are a few examples of the way that i understand what is going on. Imo, Q did not want us to simply adopt a pseudo religious belief, like "if you truly believe in Q, then you MUST think [x]"
Q dropped this 8 times:
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
What you are actually asserting is holding a position based on authority (your view of "Q"), tradition (anon group think - aka If you believe in Q, you must accept {premise}), dogma, etc.
In my opinion.
It's your right, and you may be right, to a greater or lesser extent, but saying that your own interpretation is the ONLY possible or valid interpretation, well, that's the opposite of what Q wanted people to think, imo.
It's a linear logic, that says, this means this means this means this. But if the first this means something else, then everything that follows will also be off target....
Anyway, I'm just suggesting you might like to consider some other options. If you have considered different ways and different angles at looking at all of this, and still arrive at your conclusion, what more could you do? But, I wonder if you have considered that there might be different ways of looking at what the Q drops are actually saying, and what impact they were written to have.
Either way, thanks for the reply.
Addendum:
Look at scripture. Some people take the scripture literally, others as purely symbolic, others as a mix. Those Christians in the past who took Christ's words literally, missed the point. Jesus was NOT an arsonist. "I came to cast fire upon the earth". So then, what does he mean?
Patriots in control and you are watching a movie, can be taken literally, or they could be understood as descriptive metaphors intended to jog us awake to seeing things from a perspective outside the matrix. The later requires more nuanced thinking, that perhaps is not for everyone...
That sounds like a "conspiracy theory". I mean, to do that would take a lot of good actors, not to mention you'd have to have "Doc" from "Back to the Future" working a quantum computer out of his DeLorean to make all the events line up perfectly. 🤔😎
Wait. Are you implying that the Patriots organized for Walz to be on the VP ticket?
I think that's a stretch, personally.
However, when an enemy is destroying themselves, the best way to hurt them it to get out of their way.
The corrupt machine of the Democrat faction of the Cabal will do what they are going to do. The Patriots simply have to stand back and let them be them. (While cording off the situation, so that damage to the population is limited.)
"patriots are in control"
Yeah I would have to say I think they'd control who the VP pick would be
So, do you think that they arranged for Kamala to be the Potus candidate? How do you see that being done, concretely speaking?
Do you think that the people running the Dem party are agents of the White Hats, or are they being told what to do by their 'puppet masters' who have in fact been taken over and controlled by WH forces?
I'm curious.
Yes, I believe they arranged for Kamala to be the candidate
She was the least likeable candidate of all of them, literally the worst possible option for them, especially after Tulsi destroyed her on stage
Biden maintained Presidency until it was absolutely too late for them to hold another primary election for a true Democratic candidate. This forced their hand to force Kamala front and center
Kamala didn't interview of really campaign the first 40+ days of her becoming the Democratic candidate
If we truly believe in Q, then we must believe:
There is/was a cabal that pulled strings on all major influences: banking, media, industry, entertainment, and politics
Patriots are in control
We are watching a movie
I believe Biden was installed on purpose. I'm not even sure if that truly is the real Joe Biden. I believe Trump knew he was going to lose the 2020 election. I believe this was in part to let the rot be exposed: pharmaceutical, politics, banking, Hollywood, etc.
I believe Biden was a puppet. I believe Kamala is a drunk was the forced into her role. I believe Q chose her as a guarantee she'd lose, as she's absolutely unlikeable.
I believe there are certain heads of the cabal that have been replaced, or lines of communication have been compromised by Q, as to influence certain decisions like Kamala choosing her VP.
Thanks for sharing. I like to hear how you views things.
No, this is not critical thinking. The assumption you are making here is that your particular interpretation of these points is exactly correct and it is what and why Q dropped these ideas.
'Truly believe in Q'
If you do not understand that Q was a psyop, then you might simply take everything at its face value. But that's not critical thinking and (in my opinion) its the opposite of the kind of thinking the Q op intended to inspire.
For example, what does "patriots in control" mean? Control in what sense? Like a general is 'in control' over all the army units under his command? Or the way that a champion chess player can arrive at a point where he is in control of the game from a game theory viewpoint?
Then, control over [what]?
In what sense are you 'watching a movie'? is it every single thing? Is it a metaphor for the idea that the systems of the world we are observing are essentially a 'game' where people play roles representing one thing, but it is not who they a really are? When a governor says he serves the people of this state, but he's actually executing graft and engaged in corruption that is against the interests of the people, is he not 'an actor'?
I appreciate that you have the particular interpretation that you do, but in my view, it is way, way too simplistic, and not a very effective way of looking at that is going on.
That said, we're all free to think and interpret what we see however we want.
Another example, if Biden was 'installed on purpose', then how. What is the mechanics?
Was the Cabal goaded into a position where they put forth Biden thinking this was their best option? Lured into making that move? Or did George Soros ring the ruling clique in the party up and tell them to make Biden the candidate, because he's actually following orders from someone else?
In a game of chess, grand champions will get to a point when they will just surrender BECAUSE they can see how things will go. Their opponent has them cornered. But less experienced players will play on, not realizing that they have already lost the game, because they don't know the game on the level that the champion does.
In this case, the winning player is 'in control', and can force the opponent to make moves that ultimately undermine themselves, but the opponent is still free and capable of making moves.
The movement started when Trump came down the escalator is a win all scenario. Either they win, or we do. The cabal cannot simply 'give up' and surrender the game, because it is existential; giving up means they are dead, completely. So, they play on, play on, making moves, hoping somehow to get a break, while all the time, the players 'in control' are pushing, luring and leading them into making moves that damage them further.
As far a the movie goes, it should be very, very clear that Trump is playing a character, leading the Cabal elements to think he's foolish, or bafoonish, etc, etc, etc, whereas in fact he's extremely strategic. He constantly taunts the MSM and the rabid Dems into places where they shoot themselves in the feet. Is he not 'playing a role'?
These are a few examples of the way that i understand what is going on. Imo, Q did not want us to simply adopt a pseudo religious belief, like "if you truly believe in Q, then you MUST think [x]"
Q dropped this 8 times:
What you are actually asserting is holding a position based on authority (your view of "Q"), tradition (anon group think - aka If you believe in Q, you must accept {premise}), dogma, etc.
In my opinion.
It's your right, and you may be right, to a greater or lesser extent, but saying that your own interpretation is the ONLY possible or valid interpretation, well, that's the opposite of what Q wanted people to think, imo.
It's a linear logic, that says, this means this means this means this. But if the first this means something else, then everything that follows will also be off target....
Anyway, I'm just suggesting you might like to consider some other options. If you have considered different ways and different angles at looking at all of this, and still arrive at your conclusion, what more could you do? But, I wonder if you have considered that there might be different ways of looking at what the Q drops are actually saying, and what impact they were written to have.
Either way, thanks for the reply.
Addendum:
Look at scripture. Some people take the scripture literally, others as purely symbolic, others as a mix. Those Christians in the past who took Christ's words literally, missed the point. Jesus was NOT an arsonist. "I came to cast fire upon the earth". So then, what does he mean?
Patriots in control and you are watching a movie, can be taken literally, or they could be understood as descriptive metaphors intended to jog us awake to seeing things from a perspective outside the matrix. The later requires more nuanced thinking, that perhaps is not for everyone...
wwg1wga
💯
That sounds like a "conspiracy theory". I mean, to do that would take a lot of good actors, not to mention you'd have to have "Doc" from "Back to the Future" working a quantum computer out of his DeLorean to make all the events line up perfectly. 🤔😎
Patriots are in contr...
.....................................Let's talk about your health🤣😂😹