So, I have been watching a certain kind of news article for many, many years. The news article has a very formulaic template of
“LARGE NUMBER OF PEDOS ARRESTED, LARGE NUMBER OF CHILDREN RESCUED”
idk why these stories caught my attention. maybe it was their compulsive need to “hedge” facts
for example, they might say AT LEAST 152 pedos arrested, and AT LEAST 63 children rescued
what you mean “at least”?
if there was MORE than 152 or 63, then maybe just give us that exact number, instead of implying theres some sort of ambigiuty on basic facts
I was also “concerned” that the authorities seem to sit on these cases for many years, before taking any action, which means to me that “at least” 63 children were being abused daily while the authorites are sipping coffee…
I spent many hours chasing these stories, trying to find any actual evidence that anyone was arrested, or that anyone was rescued
At first, i could NEVER find any supporting evidence, such as the suspects names, mugshots, court dates, convictions, etc
After many posts and comments like the one you are reading now, things started to change….
Now we get a whole page of names and mugshots, but the faces feel like AI, and so do the names.
When you try to follow-up on these names, theres almost nothing out there. No local news etc
So, just recently i had the bright idea to use ChatGPT to make a master list of all these supposed operations, and how they were resolved
ChatGPT would cite a government claim, like a DOJ press release, as actual evidence
When i pressed harder, ChatGPT conceeded there was no real evidence outside of vague claims made by the government
ChatGPT also mentioned how a lot of times, these long running “fed” operations were actually just a summary of what local law enforcement had been doing over the last X years
Local cops bust a local pimp, the feds take credit, and lump the local bust in with
“operation look busy because the boss is coming”
i also asked chatGPT to produce any evidence that any of these supposedly rescue children actually exist.
ChatGPT gave me all kinds of reasons why they couldn’t give me any evidence and none of them were very convincing at all
Out of the thousands of children supposedly rescued, none of them have made a social media page or started a foundation or organization or whatever to publicize what happened to them and to publicize the problems and maybe try to do something about it
Mark my word: because I will be referencing this post in the near future…
After this post goes out, a person will emerge and claim that they were a victim of child sex trafficking, and that they were rescued during one of these operations. However, if we dig deeper on this person, we will find out they are nothing more than a crisis actor, feeding us another scripted line of bullshit.
My challenge to anyone reading this:
Make a mental note to yourself, that next time you hear a big story about a bunch of pedophiles being arrested in children being rescued, you’re gonna check it out a little deeper
You’re gonna find out if any of those people were from your hometown
You’re gonna find out if any of those people were from your home state
You’re gonna find out if any of these people have mug shots or their names
You’re gonna find out if there’s any court dates
And you’re gonna find out if there’s any convictions
And I think what you will find very quickly, is that these stories are very long on big claims, and very short on hard evidence
The OP hasn't said anything about missing children outside the context of proving Q and Trump are lying.
His point is that the numbers are imaginary.
In that hypothetical being painted, there are no kids. Not, "there are kids but they're not being saved", but instead the claim is "there are no kids, the kids don't exist".
Somehow, you've jumped from "kids not existing" to "the kids exist and they're not being saved", as if Trump and Q somehow know where the kids are but refuse to save them.
Again, blackpilling at the highest degree. The wildest accusations imaginable, no proof -- and somehow a "lack of proof" is being offered as proof.
Completely 100% in all ways ridiculous.
Sorry but I believe there are kids, but there has to be a million now based on reports, so where are they?
Assume you have a child. The child was abducted, perhaps because the child had a social media account and a stalker found them.
The child is found.
Walk me through the thought process where a parent in that situation goes to the evil social media that got their child abducted in the first place, and blabs in non-private settings about their abducted child being saved.
Would you do that? Or would you avoid social media like the plague?
If you hadn't already deleted all social media accounts in that situation, you would be incredibly naive.
Attempting to crowdsource all of GAW to locate such people among trillions of social media accounts, and citing the lack of success in doing so as proof you're correct, is idiotic. Accusing Trump and Q of lying because you can't find any evidence to the contrary is a bad faith argument.
I have two kids and I would tell them both to speak out a la Plauche. I would consider it morally responsible to save other kids. You don't understand how personal this is to some of us
How important?
Important enough to actually require proof?
The fallacy argument is called Appeal to Ignorance. Look it up.
There are 500 million social media messages made per day. Crowdsourcing GAW to help you or the OP to tackle finding proof that your hunch that Trump and Q are lying is the most fucking asinine thing I've ever heard of, pardon my French.
If you actually cared about kids I'm sure there are more productive things you could be doing than crowdsourcing all of GAW to help you prove that Trump and Q liars.
Even if I were to grant that you would be successful and all of GAW ends up hating Trump and Q, the kids are still missing aren't they? Tell me what you accomplished then to save the kids if you're successful in your endeavor.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Jeffrey_Doucet
Upon further review… is this story also fake news?
Once upon a time, it was uncommon to have security cameras, smart phones, social media, news crews,
But somehow the news just happened to be recording?
kinda like Butler PA?
I don’t think your brain is working very well right now. If my child went missing, everyone would know. If I found them, everyone would know.
right!
and while not everybody would, behave exactly like you,
enough people would, behave exactly like you…
How is it possible you saw the caravan in 2018 and not believe there are children we have little knowledge of that have been saved?
I mean we all know it was mostly men mass migrating, but of the 30 million+ who have made their way into the Country surely there is at least a million children.
Hell you watch enough on the internet you'll find videos of women willingly selling their children into the trade. Who do we reunite that child with lmao?
Upon further review, those “caravan” narratives feel very hollywood.
Theres a theme to these stories, which is that there is this slow-moving threat, heading directly for you and your family
killer bees
murder hornets
measles
meteors
climate change
hoards of immigrants with diseases
a hole in the ozone layer
earthquakes and fault lines
volcanos and rip tides
aligators and stingrays
avalances and
soil erosiom
DDT and AZT
MMR and DTP
stranger danger
and free candy vans
Its always something
A monster under your bed
A boogeyman in your head
Are you actually arguing people weren't crossing the border in mass quantities? Or just the caravan was phony in its entirety?
I feel like your missing the forest for the tree here. Especially in regards to my point/argument.
Caravan or not; unidentified, and undocumented people came here. And children are a part of that statistic.
Whether the caravan was a "boogeyman" scenario or not makes no difference whatsoever.
And truthfully there is no need to review it further. Anyone with a brain knows how orchestrated the whole caravan event was. From the funding of it to the media.
Ok so they’re not AMERICAN children then. That’s what you’re saying? That’s a fair point.
Wait I assumed you were u/magavoices. Your point is fine. He, I’m worried about. I don’t think he’s a genuine open minded Q poster. He’s encouraging cult-like T and Q discipleship at the expense of critical thinking. Hope the mods deport his fake ass. Your point however, is decent and a fair question.